It was about a Palpatine. Skywalkers we're in it, but they were so inconsistently written from their original versions as to be irreconcilable with their depictions in previous material. Insufficient explanations were given for changes in core character behaviors.
Again, it was also more about the Palpatine girl and the new characters than the Skywalkers. Despite Disney's claims to the contrary, it's absurd to call that abortion of a trilogy part of the Skywalker saga.
it is officially according to Lucasfilm a part of the Skywalker Saga...there's nothing to debate...you're just wrong...plus I just listed all the legacy characters that were main parts of the sequel trilogy...now you're changing your opinion and talking about how the characters were 'inconsistent' compared to the OT...that's not the point...seems like you just want to double down on your incorrect opinion no matter how much evidence is presented to the contrary