Mugato
Muh Feelz!
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 933
The video was actually pretty good, imagine if they put two of these setups in one laptop, that would be sweet! MGPU!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice Paul to give us a shout-out. He wrote for HardOCP before he wrote for Tom's.http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-intel-gpu-emib-soc,35852.html
Mentioned Kyle by name.
"There have been rumors, beginning with a forum post earlier this year by HardOCP's Kyle Bennet, that claimed AMD is developing GPUs for Intel."
Sorry, what are you talking about?
G-Sync is still superior (that's why we're getting FreeSync2), CUDA is still what you use if you want to get the most performance out of the fastest compute processors available and thus is actually taught in schools, and what open standard is AMD championing that's actually relevant to the thread?
Guaranteed it won't touch a discrete Nvidia chip in performance, and good luck in the drivers staying current......
Hehe, nope.
Hey consumer "buy this stock" ... then once prices skyrockets they sell and get out.Motley fool admits they own shares in Nvidia.
ALWAYS be leery of sites that give stock advice . More often than not, their "advice" is meant to steer people in a direction that will benefit the ADVISORS' stocks, NOT the reader/listener.
how does this benefit intel?
99% of laptops sold have an intel chip, shitty gpu or not.
how does this benefit intel?
99% of laptops sold have an intel chip, shitty gpu or not.
Hey consumer "buy this stock" ... then once prices skyrockets they sell and get out.
NO ONE is going to give away easy money tips.
I've found that those stock sites are pretty much a joke. They run click bait information and that is about it. Anything to get viewers is published, right or wrong. That said, I've also realized the stock market is controlled by the top 1% and how the company is performing really means nothing. Stock market should have the slogan "Where the rich make themselves richer and fuck the little guy".
Never understood this way of thinking. Who cares what people use them for as long as they're buying them?
Navi that bad?
They finally got off of the arctic islands architecture with Vega being the last.
Who is designing the new line? AMD screwed going forward with graphics?
Sorry, what are you talking about?
G-Sync is still superior (that's why we're getting FreeSync2), CUDA is still what you use if you want to get the most performance out of the fastest compute processors available and thus is actually taught in schools, and what open standard is AMD championing that's actually relevant to the thread?
25-35% of laptops sold have a Nvidia GPU. (Percentages are guesses, point is Intel wants the GPU money too.)
That's damn funny.I just wonder how far up the AMD/Intel chain of command Kyle had to seduce to get that info.
Right now I'm envisioning Kyle wearing his silky pirate shirt with the front open showing off his impressive chest hair while pouring Lisa Su some champagne.
One interesting wrinkle: Intel will be responsible for supplying the drivers for the Radeon GPU
Cause apple can't even put a cheap discreet GPU in their low end laptops that still cost a arm and a leg. Have too pony up over 2k to get something other then Intel integrated gpu and cheap pos AMD GPU at that.It was known that Apple was not entirely happy with Intel built-in graphics for a number of years, especially when they started pushing their "retina" marketing, so that is definitely a factor.
But congrats Kyle, on the sweet drank of vindication!!!!!!1
It is time for Nvidia to go hold my beer and make a CPU that crushes both AMD and Intel.So... Does this make Nvidia the underdog now? I'd love to see them whip out a low-power, high-performance, mid-cost part that mops the floor with this. The problem being the CPU side. They'd still need to rely on one or the other....
That's El Chingón to you bubThis is why I get my news here.
Good work El Hefe. Glad to see someone vindicated on The Internet.
It is time for Nvidia to go hold my beer and make a CPU that crushes both AMD and Intel.
I am on top of the world...LOL, a lot of people here are enjoying a big damn slice of humble pie now.
It is time for Nvidia to go hold my beer and make a CPU that crushes both AMD and Intel.
That will never happen as Intel will never sell another license for x86 and trying to emulate it will never be good enough to compete.
I know that it probably not possible but Nvidia and maybe Samsung are only companies that could make a competitive CPU. One can dream of 3 major players in the cpu market. Hell we have to leave x86 behind at some point. If any could give it a push out Nvidia could do it. I think at this point x86 is holding back any true performance gain.That will never happen as Intel will never sell another license for x86 and trying to emulate it will never be good enough to compete.
I know that it probably not possible but Nvidia and maybe Samsung are only companies that could make a competitive CPU. One can dream of 3 major players in the cpu market. Hell we have to leave x86 behind at some point. If any could give it a push out Nvidia could do it. I think at this point x86 is holding back any true performance gain.
So why is nvidia coming out with gsync hdr? Oh, that's right so it can compete with freesync 2.