Windows 10 Buggy Updates? Our Patching Is Simple, Regular, Consistent Says Microsoft

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Aug 4, 2018.

  1. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Newsflash!!! This kind of stuff has been going on for the last fifty years! It's called marketing. If you haven't heard about it you must have been living under a rock since the early 1980s. This has been going on for years man, decades even. This isn't a new concept by any stretch of the imagination.
    As any company should do. If there is a warrant the company being served has the legal obligation to hand over said associated data and if they disobey said warrant they would be held in contempt of court and the executives could be imprisoned themselves. Again, not a new concept by any means.
    I'm going to poke some holes in this.

    Big fucking deal. As long as said data doesn't contain actual personal and personally identifiable data, it is just that... reports for analysis and research. Again, this shit's been going on since the early 1980s man. Get over it man, we've been the subject of this kind of shit for years.
    Oh... like nVidia knowing about why their drivers are suddenly causing systems world wide to spontaneously BSOD? That would be a perfectly valid business reason and one that I would be very damn happy that Microsoft shared said data with nVidia so as to better allow them to fix their shit.
    Again... as long as it doesn't contain personally identifiable data there is not a damn thing any judge or lawyer can do about it. Now if it actually named you, personally, in said data... then there would be a problem and the result of that would be a lawsuit so fucking big it would be able to eclipse the sun.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2018
    heatlesssun likes this.
  2. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    This stuff has been out there for years reviewed by countless folks. It's boiler plate stuff. Anyone who has a bank account or mortgage or credit card gets those privacy statements in the mail that most people throw away without reading and it's the same kind of stuff. Yeah, they have data, it gets used and shared for various purposed, not saying it's all benevolent but there's a big difference between and selling personal information to 3rd parties for direct profit. If Microsoft is doing that it's not in these well reviewed documents.
     
  3. Mazzspeed

    Mazzspeed [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,750
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    All these workarounds just to get the operating system to do what I want it to do on my PC! Honestly, I found it easier to dump the operating system for one that respects me as the user. In relation to setting up a hardware firewall to block communications to Microsoft, once again, to much mucking around and the destination addresses have a nasty habit of changing all the time - Not really a practical solution.

    In relation to removing the Connected User Experience from Windows 10 Home and Professional before install, I doubt that's possible. Perhaps under Enterprise, but I doubt it's possible under 10 Home and Professional.
     
    Frobozz likes this.
  4. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Never said they did but they obviously reflect the needs of a great many. My office cube neighbor just got his new Windows 10 laptop today, his three year cycle had just ended. All the new machines coming into the bank, Windows 10 only unless you get a waiver pointing out a critical business need.

    That's not how most legal systems work. The state can't ask you to prove you didn't murder someone, it's up to the state to prove that you did. People can make all the baseless claims they want. If one doesn't like Microsoft, hates their business practices, thinks they are just lying about everything, etc. and wants things to change it's going proof that the law and markets can see clearly and not just anonymous posts that can claim anything they want.

    In the 1803 there's a tool that shows all the JSON telemetry data, nothing is hidden.
     
  5. Mazzspeed

    Mazzspeed [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,750
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    And, once again, I don't care. How is this relevant to everyone?

    Once again, a cop out.

    There is an encrypted file stored on your PC right now with permissions set so you cannot access it by any simple means in a folder invisible to the operating system ready to be sent to Microsoft, as a realist that sounds incredibly suspicious to me. If you want to argue that MS are not sending personal data as 'security information' than prove to everyone this is the case. This is HOCP, not the legal system.

    So why isn't there an option to simply opt out of telemetry data? Is that tool displaying all telemetry data in those files? If there's a tool to view 'all' the data in those files, why are they encrypted in the first place?
     
    tetris42 likes this.
  6. DPI

    DPI Nitpick Police

    Messages:
    10,960
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    Nope. It's only partial - MS's cherrypicked data points. There are thousands more unaccounted for and undocumented, and MS is keeping them that way.

    Of course, going around in autistic circles "you can't prove it, you can't see inside their encrypted data so there's no smoking gun" is little more than ironic shitposting at this point, and ultimately besides the point. They can collect all the personally identifiable data they want, just give people an opt out.

    If there was no profit motive to the data collection and it was simply to "make Windows 10 better" then they wouldn't be so adamant about not providing an opt out - there'd be more than enough data from hundreds of millions of PCs that a small fraction of users turning it off wouldn't matter.

    But of course there's a profit motive. And its so big that they'd rather keep hemorrhaging marketshare and keep their heels dug in waiting out the Windows 7/8 clingers for a decade than give them a big reason to convert to 10 sooner.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2018
    clockdogg likes this.
  7. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Huh? Nothing is relvaent to everyone. Windows how is extremely relavant to folks that depend on PCs where there are no alternatives to what is supports.

    So proof and legal system that puts the burden of proof of the accuser is a cop out? How in the hell do you prove a negative in this case? If Microsoft is selling personal data it would be far easier to find a single example anyway.


    There is an encrypted file stored on your PC right now with permissions set so you cannot access it by any simple means in a folder invisible to the operating system ready to be sent to Microsoft, as a realist that sounds incredibly suspicious to me. If you want to argue that MS are not sending personal data as 'security information' than prove to everyone this is the case. This is HOCP, not the legal system.


    And there is a tool in Store what works with 1803 and above that shows the telemetry: https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-microsoft-rolls-out-new-privacy-tools-for-telemetry-data/

    Good grief, now you're arguing what's been out there plain as day for months?
     
  8. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Considering how extensive and detailed what I've seen in the tool reports that makes no sense. Again, proof?
     
  9. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Like I said before, good luck bringing this before a lawyer and judge. Hell, the judge may just send you to jail just for wasting his time.
     
    heatlesssun likes this.
  10. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    You're deflecting away from the subject - something that heatlesssun does frequently, as well. That your response depends on disingenuous topic shifting shows that your defence of Microsoft's harvesting and selling of personal data doesn't stand up when looked at closely.

    Marketing is sending information to potential customers, and not the taking of personal data from people's private property without their permission. That's called theft. Microsoft having personal data that they took from people's personally-owned OSes is also not marketing. Microsoft sells that personal data to other companies so that they can use it for marketing purposes, but Microsoft taking and possessing that personal data is not marketing.


    You've failed to grasp the point, which is that, logically, not all the data Microsoft shares is anonymous and aggregated - showing that Microsoft's suggestion that some of the data they share is aggregated is only a suggestion of some hypothetical situations and not a pledge that it is all anonymous or a comment on the extent of the way that Microsoft shares data.


    Judging by your above-quoted remarks, I'm doubtful of that.


    Once again, you're trying to shift the topic from the harvesting, possession, and selling of personal data to simply the usage of it once other companies have it in their hands after buying it from Microsoft.

    And It's not for you to decide whether the data Microsoft shares is acceptable or not based on whether it is personally-identifiable. That data was generated by people's machines, software, activity, electricity, time, etc, and it is being used to profit Microsoft at the expense of Windows owners. That is unjust enrichment.

    Also, there is nothing indicating that all data sold by Microsoft to other companies and groups is anonymous.


    What you personally would like doesn't overrule what everybody else would like regarding having control over their own data. In an environment where people have control over their data, if you would like to share it, then that is your choice and you can do so. And people who do not wish to share it can be sure that theirs is not shared.


    Again, regardless of whether the data is personally-identifiable or not, it is a problem that Microsoft has taken it in the first place from people's personally-owned OSes and that Microsoft is profiting off of it and the expense of the people who the data belongs to - which is unjust enrichment. And, also again, there is nothing indicating that all data shared is anonymous.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2018
  11. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Pretty hilarious. I guess we're shills by pointing out how basic legal processes work now?
     
  12. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    We're not deflecting. We're asking for proof, something with legal meaning and not a bunch of online conspiracy theories based on open documentation that's been examined by lawyers for years.

    And hell let's say you're right. What exactly is supposed to happen from there? What are the consequences and steps you'd want out of you're saying?
     
  13. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    All of this is nothing more than supposition and hearsay. Until someone can find actual concrete proof with their fucking name specifically spelled out in said data there is nothing to talk about, nothing that a lawyer and judge will do anything about.
    Let me ask you something. Do you have a bank account? Credit card? Amazon account? Netflix account? Shopper savings card at your local grocery store? Gym membership? Cable/Satellite TV? Internet Service Provider? Car loan? Mortgage? Have you recently paid a bill? Any bill, it doesn't matter what kind of bill.

    I bet you're asking what all of that has to do with Microsoft. Simple. All of those companies aggregate and sell customer data and has been something that has been happening for decades. Companies sell data back and forth, this has been something that has been happening for years. And you want to know something about all of this? Lawyers have been over all of these kinds of data sharing agreements like flies on shit for the last fifty years. You want to know something else? It's all been approved of and sanctioned by lawyers and judges for years and has had more scrutiny than the US Constitution.
     
  14. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    No, you're asking for proof, despite being shown it.

    trparky contested whether the meaning of the proof mattered - and I addressed those challenges.

    A mandated option to secure one's data and deny Microsoft from being able to collect and / or sell any data from a person's Windows OS - just like California has recently implemented. And acknowledgement of the fact that such control is a right of people and that Microsoft has no right to data from people's owned OSes. If they want to let Microsoft use their personally-owned data for Microsoft's profit, then that is an individual choice for people to make on their own without coercion from Microsoft.
     
    clockdogg and Frobozz like this.
  15. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    NO IT IS NOT PROOF!!! Not in the eyes of the LAW and that is ALL that matters here.
     
  16. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    I swear to God, I feel like I'm in the middle of a bad X-Files episode here.
     
    heatlesssun likes this.
  17. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Microsoft saying that they share customer data via business reports and sale of assets with and to 3rd parties, researchers, OEMs, advertisers, etc, is certainly proof that Microsoft shares and sells customer data. It is literally Microsoft stating that they share and sell customer data. If you don't grasp that, then your English comprehension is very poor.

    Now, why are you bringing up "the law" here, as if Microsoft selling customer data would be against the law as it currently stands? It will be in California come 2020, and hopefully it will be for the rest of the world too, eventually (the sooner the better).
     
  18. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    If what you call proof were really that then some smart and expensive lawyers would be using it to sue the bejesus out of Microsoft.
     
  19. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Shares data is one thing, everyone with personal data has to make these statements. SELLING IT is another matter.
     
  20. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Any lawyer will blow holes in your argument the size of Texas. That's why this issue hasn't been brought out of the shadows and into the light, because there's nothing to be talked about. The lawyers have all been over it, forwards and backwards, side to side, front to back, etc. and it all been legally approved of.
    You don't seem to grasp the concept of "business reports". If you worked inside a company, an actual company, you would know that these so called "business reports" are just that... business reports. They represent data from all over the place, aggregated data. In other words, no personally identifiable data. They are nothing more than summary reports that contains data from hundreds, if not thousands of data points that are brought together for a report that's no more than 100 or so pages long.
     
    heatlesssun likes this.
  21. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Why - do people in bad X-Files episodes lack reading comprehension, too?

    Microsoft explicitly states that they share and sell customer data. Microsoft stating that they do is proof that Microsoft does.

    Why do you think they would - As if Microsoft selling customer data would be against the law as it currently stands? It will be in California come 2020, and hopefully it will be for the rest of the world too, eventually (the sooner the better).

    Is Twitter currently being sued for selling user data? Is Facebook? Is Google? Where do you get your naive ideas about law and why do you spout them with such certainty?

    Microsoft explicitly states that they sell customer data: "We also might disclose data as part of a corporate transaction such as... a sale of assets".

    Do you not know that "selling" and "sale refer to the same action where "assets" (such as data) are given in exchange for money?
     
  22. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Oh, you're going to talk about that fucked up state? The same very state that says that just about every damn thing made today can cause cancer? LOL The same very state that up until recently they had major electricity issues all because they didn't want to build new power plants? The same socialist state that's damn near going bankrupt? Again... LOL

    I wouldn't be holding California in such high regard, that state is full of stupidity (except for Silicon Valley of course).
     
  23. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Why are you again deferring to the idea of a legal case when the subject has not been about the legality of Microsoft selling people's data? I haven't made a legal argument and I haven't argued that Microsoft selling people's data is currently illegal - but it will be post January 2020 in California unless people specifically choose to allow Microsoft to sell their data. Right now, it isn't a clear-cut legal matter that Microsoft is selling people's data.

    Falling back on a sentiment of 'lawyers would be all over it' to try to refute what hasn't been a legal debate suggests to me that you don't know how and why law would engage with this matter.

    No. Rather, you You fail to discern the distinction between an internal business report and one shared with a 3rd party including researchers, advertisers, OEMs, LEOs. You also ignore that customer data sold as a corporate transaction is customer data that is sold.
     
  24. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    This same language is in every privacy statement that comes a bank, mortgage company, credit card company, etc. because guess what. Companies buy other companies or parts of them.
     
  25. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    The data itself is an asset. And to sell it, whether it is anonymised or aggregated or not, is a sale of assets.
     
    clockdogg likes this.
  26. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Because... in the real world THAT'S ALL THAT FUCKING MATTERS!!!
     
    heatlesssun likes this.
  27. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    I've worked in the IT financial industry for 25 years, yeah our data is an asset. We're required by law to send out the same language about data, hell we have a shit load more personal info than they do, at least of the detailed financial variety.
     
  28. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    That isn't all that matters. If that were the case, then things that are not illegal would never become illegal, because they weren't already illegal in the first place. But GDPR and California's new legislation mandating personal control over one's data and the choice to deny companies from selling it shows that the law is not all that matters and that new laws arise when something matters but isn't being regarded.

    Also, you've again drifted from the topic of whether Microsoft sells customer data to whether it matters due to law if Microsoft sells customer data.

    Then you know that when Microsoft states that they disclose customer data in a sale of assets, that statement of Microsoft's covers all situations where Microsoft would sell customer data for profit.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2018
  29. trparky

    trparky Gawd

    Messages:
    971
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Delicieuxz, you sound like one of those snowflakes that are upset that they didn't get their way. Get over it. Now whether you like it or not, the LAW is the LAW; that's how the adult world works.
     
  30. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    You sound as though you are projecting. Your arguments have been shown to be fallacious, your claims false, your direction of argument constantly shifting. Each time you've been faced with facts, you've said something random that is neither here nor there to the discussed topic. You clearly really don't like being shown to be wrong and aren't coping with it very well.

    What it this even supposed to mean in the context of this discussion? Which law are appealing to that you think is being contested? I'm not aware of anybody bringing one up.

    You resemble the guy in Anchorman just yelling "LOUD NOISES" while not having a clue what it's supposed to mean.
     
  31. SmokeRngs

    SmokeRngs [H]ard|DCer of the Month - April 2008

    Messages:
    15,750
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Bullshit. You keep denying that MS doesn't sell data. You keep claiming that MS only uses the spying internally to make its products better. It's up to you to provide that proof. You state these things as facts and it's up to you to prove it's true.

    You mean like the hearsay that MS only uses the spying data for improving products.
     
  32. Mazzspeed

    Mazzspeed [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,750
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    This example does not, in any way, relate to everyone in the same way that your needs do not relate to everyone.

    How can this be so hard to understand? It's mindblowing.
     
  33. jtm55

    jtm55 Gawd

    Messages:
    526
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Hi All

    This going back in forth is getting folk nowhere. Why not agree to disagree and call it a day.
     
  34. Mazzspeed

    Mazzspeed [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,750
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    I honestly don't believe it's a very good idea to compare Microsoft with the banking industry. One of the most corrupt industries in existence, responsible for the GFC, despite the fact that you're no doubt going to somehow refute that claim. ;)
     
  35. Mazzspeed

    Mazzspeed [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,750
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    When Heatlesssun is involved, it always does. :rolleyes:
     
  36. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    So your proof that Microsoft is selling data is something that applies to just about every company on planet Earth?
     
  37. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    They (heatle and trparky) know that they're wrong, and they're trying to spin everybody around in circles and bluff them out until people stop responding to them so that they can leave a last assertive post in the thread appearing to have it look like an accepted conclusion.

    Those two can babble substance-less BS all day long to shill for Microsoft.

    It applies to companies that sell data. Banks sell data. Credit Card companies sell data.
     
  38. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Companies get greedy, banks are a good example of that, it's well documented.
     
  39. Mazzspeed

    Mazzspeed [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,750
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    In the case of default out of the box privacy settings under Windows 10 I'm pretty sure there's targeted advertising on the lock screen, wouldn't that be evidence of MS selling user data?

    And MS are most definitely no different in this regard. Although I do admit they are trying to give the impression of cleaning up their act a little in the last few years.
     
  40. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    It applies to any company what has data. From banks to hospitals to mom pop stores. When you sell a business the buyer is going to want any and all data that you have.