- Joined
- Oct 22, 2004
- Messages
- 6,604
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
elfletcho said:bigdavethehorn, do you have your HD(s) in a Raid Stripe?
bigdavethehorn said:Nope, only got one drive. Suppose I could try 2, I thought that the general consensus was that RAID wasn't worth it on the desktop?
NewBlackDak said:Is your drive close to maximum capacity? Most drives act like a turd when they get over the 85% full stage.
unclewebb said:Has anyone tried running the CoreTemp program on their s754 CPUs.
Xilikon said:Yes, it's not worth it. If you feel it's sluggish,there is many causes for it like :
-DMA mode not enabled.
-Heavily fragmented partitions.
-Disk going bad (I know from experience with over 50 HDD failing at work as a IT Senior Technician).
Xilikon said:Yes, it's not worth it. If you feel it's sluggish,there is many causes for it like :
-DMA mode not enabled.
-Heavily fragmented partitions.
-Disk going bad (I know from experience with over 50 HDD failing at work as a IT Senior Technician).
Getting RAID isn't worth for many reasons :
-marginal performances increases, which can be cancelled by getting some excellent harddisks.
-Zero data reliability. 1 HDD fail and you lose everything. This include controller or bios failures, which can destroy everything.
-The desktop access mode isn't efficient for RAID. The only efficient place is in business storage stuff, where there is lots of concurrent accesses.
That sounds about right for a clocked newcastle. My Venice shows about 43C at idle.bigdavethehorn said:Cheers for that, I'm at 48 degrees, at idle, with an XP90.
my clawhammer shows 38c idle. always.unclewebb said:That sounds about right for a clocked newcastle. My Venice shows about 43C at idle.
On my Gigabyte board SpeedFan does not seem to report the proper core temperature the way CoreTemp does. SpeedFan shows 25C, 29C, -6C, 33C and my hard drive temperature at 41C.Unknown-One said:And BTW, thats the same thing that SpeedFan reports...so whats different about this app?
unclewebb said:That sounds about right for a clocked newcastle. My Venice shows about 43C at idle.

The people that seem to have the best results overclocking their s754 Venice chips have either nForce3 or nForce4 boards. Your Sempron 2800 will do over 2600 MHz ( 325 MHz X 8.0 ) on a good board but you'll probably never see anything close to that on the board you have.GoldenTiger said:I jumped on a pre-built Sempron S754 1.6ghz (2800+ Venice) that had an ECS 761GX-M754 motherboard in it.
unclewebb said:The people that seem to have the best results overclocking their s754 Venice chips have either nForce3 or nForce4 boards. Your Sempron 2800 will do over 2600 MHz ( 325 MHz X 8.0 ) on a good board but you'll probably never see anything close to that on the board you have.
I jumped on that deal, gonna replace my 3700+ with the venice, and use the free mobo in a pc im building for work. Also, I am replacing my DFI with a Abit NV8.elfletcho said:
L1ght said:What kind of clocks are people getting with the 754 venice chips?
BigMacAttack said:Nice going. What hsf are you using? If you have a good one you can get more out of that 3400+. They'll do 2.7+ pretty easily. Right now I'm running game stable at 230x12 @ 1.64v. It'll do 225x12 @ 1.54v easily.
Its great to see more and more people getting turned on to the 3400+ Venice.
Mine will be water cooled, and I am not afraid to bumb up the voltage on such a cheap chip.Xilikon said:The average overclock hover around 2.6 - 2.65 with most Venices. It can hit 2.7 - 2.8 but it take extreme voltage bumps and heavy cooling to get this feat.
My previous CPU was an E6 core Sempron 2600 which I used to run mostly at 320 MHz X 8.0 = 2560 MHz at 1.55 volts. At 1.60 volts it would run reliably at 327 MHz X 8.0 ~ 2618 MHz but I had to use a larger memory divider at this speed and didn't really gain much overall performance over 2560 so I usually left it there. The BIOS for my Gigabyte maxes out at 327 so to get beyond that I had to use the ClockGen program which helped me hit about 330 to 335 X 8.0.GoldenTiger said:Wow, are you serious? I probably would swap the board out at some point when I need that much oomph if so... I can't even get this to boot into Windows at 210FSB with the 1:1 ratio set. Is there a different/modded BIOS I should be trying, or am I just going to be stuck at stock CPU speed with this board?
unclewebb said:The Gigabyte K8NS is a pretty solid, reliable board for the price. It uses the nVidia nForce3 chipset with AGP. If you have a PCI-E graphics card then look for a s754 nForce4 board instead.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813128259
BigMacAttack said:So whatcha getting instead? AM2, Conroe? I'm nosy - what can I say?![]()