Cyberpunk 2077: Official Thread

Discussion in 'PC Gaming & Hardware' started by Krenum, Oct 19, 2012.

  1. Krenum

    Krenum [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,459
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    In CDprojectred we trust.
     
  2. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,341
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2001
    I'm also hoping you can make your own character, even if it has to be within specific confines (a la Mass Effect) for this game. Witcher 3 was amazing, but part of me is also going "damn it would have been cool to enter this world with a witcher of my own creation."
     
    dvsman likes this.
  3. jiminator

    jiminator [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,598
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    witcher 3 was pretty huge but for skellega it was mostly water. I am wondering if the leak is in terms of comparable land mass or overall map size. because that would be a big fucking map :)
     
  4. polonyc2

    polonyc2 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    13,281
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    that leak makes the game sound incredible...normally I would be more skeptical but because it's CD Projekt Red I can believe it...I'm sure they want to deliver something on an even bigger scale then Witcher 3 and technology is improving every year...4 times bigger then Witcher 3 sounds a bit too ambitious but if anyone can do it it's them

    give me a release date...even if it gets pushed back I want a date to look forward to
     
    J3RK likes this.
  5. KazeoHin

    KazeoHin [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,508
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    This will fill the void that a true TES sequel requires. I'm really interested in this title.
     
    J3RK likes this.
  6. viscountalpha

    viscountalpha [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,904
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    I was at the Witcher 10 year anniversary and they would NOT talk about cyberpunk 2077. it was such a verboten topic. The passion the co-owner of CDPR was so real and inspiring that I have no doubt that cyberpunk 2077 will be a solid if not A+ title. They have done right by their fan base and deserve all the credit they have earned.

    Not worried for this title.
     
    J3RK likes this.
  7. viscountalpha

    viscountalpha [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,904
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    The problem with that is a generic main character leads to a generic inputs and outputs. It becomes like fable. I don't want that. You think you want that, but you really don't. It's better to have a well defined character which leads to a better setup and exposition.

    As a story teller, it's important to make it detailed and accurate. Not generic.
     
    J3RK likes this.
  8. J3RK

    J3RK [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,872
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    If they can pull off several types of character (whether starting or transitioned through play) and maintain good writing that will be as good in THIS context as completely designable chsracters IMO.

    Customize your character with implants, software, body-mods, armor and weapons, but having a defined character using all of these is pretty essential. Otherwise you get Bethesda-Blur TM (which is fine sometimes, but for a "Cyberpunk-Epic" I think not as much)

    There are two (more really but two big) types of RPG. Ones that let you play the role of a storied character, and ones that let you just appear in the world. Both are viable approaches, but the latter is like being kind of a nobody (every-day normal guy) and the other allows you to step into the shoes of a legend. I actually like both, but for Cyberpunk 2077, I want some form or derivation of the legend approach.

    That's oversimplified of course. By nobody I mean you're nameless to start, and you eventually gain some traction in the world. The other being you step into say Deckard's shoes, and live a day in his life or Case from Neuromancer maybe.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2017
  9. dvsman

    dvsman [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,167
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    My only ask is for them to allow us to make a custom character and not have to use some pregenerated character or one from the R. Talsorian books.

    As for CDProjekt Red, I'll give these guys some credit up front. They took an obscure book and made it a world-wide phenomenon. No matter what the book's author says ("My book was what made everyone buy the game" ... ummm, no!). Nobody outside of Poland has likely ever heard of the book before the game. I'm sure like me, most people bought the game first, then found out it was a book later on. I bought the books after I finished Witcher 3, and definitely not the other way around.

    Also I'm more likely to believe these guys are going to do what they say from their work on the Witchers and the fact that they aren't asking for crowdfunding money up front ... unlike some Space Game that shall go un-named :-D
     
    acairman likes this.
  10. Ebernanut

    Ebernanut Gawd

    Messages:
    722
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    After TW3 I can't wait. I have to say I was a little disappointed with the second Witcher game and because of that held off on the third game despite all the rave reviews, after finally playing it last spring I can definitely say that I was wrong for doubting the hype and should have bought it day one. I won't bore everyone gushing about it but it's rare to find a game that large with the attention to detail it had and that holds true for the world, the story, the characters(mostly done for them but still...), and also side quests. Hell, they even did DLC the right way.

    I thought that Dragon Age Origins did a good job of allowing you to define your character while still allowing you to be the hero. Your background made a big difference in the way the game played out but at the same time you were always playing the predestined hero role, I think CDPR could pull that off as well or better.
     
    J3RK and dvsman like this.
  11. Flogger23m

    Flogger23m [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,322
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Is that too big? Too much game for a single title? It may very well be. I have not played Witcher 3, but the biggest city seems to be meaningfully filled. I have not played it for one reason:

    I don't have the time to sit down and try it. Because I'd like to put 60-70 hours before putting it down. I can occasionally find the time for a 20-30 game, but I'd hate to have to put a strong story driven game down for 2-3 days and then get back to it.

    I wonder if the length / size may hurt it. Say if we're 100 hours into the game, will we even remember what happened in the first 10? Depending on some peoples schedules, 100 hours of game time may be over the spawn of two weeks. And judging from from average play through lengths, TW3 takes around 120-140 hours with DLC. If this size scales roughly to length, maybe it will be 180-200+ hours.

    It will certainly be interesting to see what people think of the game. If they can keep up the supposed quality of W3 and make the game 2-3 times bigger, I will be impressed to say the least. That must feel like playing a game and a host of sequels.
     
    J3RK likes this.
  12. dvsman

    dvsman [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,167
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Looking at the Witcher 3 in-game map and seeing all the icons for things to do, I never thought I would ever finish that game, but a click here, a click there and next thing you know, BOOM, finished the entire thing + all DLC / expansions!

    Witcher 3 aside, Dragon Age Origins (DAO) still ranks as one of the top CRPGs of all time. It was so fun that I ran out and bought Part 2 as soon as it came out. BUT damn if gaming companies aren't listening to their customers - DA2 turned out to be totally different from DA1/DAO (except for using the same in game names for places and people). DA2 was such a bait and switch that I wrote off the DA series for a while. Luckily for them, DA Inquisition (=DA3) started back towards being more DA1 Origins-like, though still not quite good enough yet (DA1:DAO was a CRPG while 2 and 3 were basically console click-fest action games that were ported over to the PC).
     
  13. J3RK

    J3RK [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,872
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    That's definitely a concern. However, I do have a bit of faith that this game will be compelling enough to where dropping it a few days for those of us with too much life going on can pick it up and know what the he'll we're doing.

    You never know, but like others have said, if anyone can it's these guys.
     
  14. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,341
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2001
    I understand what you're trying to say, but I disagree completely. As I said, just look at Mass Effect for an example of how you can allow the player some freedom in character creation, but still have an engaging character that's strongly rooted in the story.
     
  15. northrop

    northrop grumman

    Messages:
    8,121
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    The way I understood this is that with all the DLC's put together, the size of the game will be substantially larger than W3. So the base game might still take you 100h to complete, similarly to W3, but they plan on having more and/or larger DLC's (like Blood and Wine) later on, that will add to the scale of the game itself.

    That being said, when the guys from W3 took over the project in May 2016, the rumor has it, all the work that's been done to that point has been scrapped, and they started from scratch (trailer came out in 2012, so... give or take 4-5 years of work ended up in trash). That's before the news regarding the engine upgrade that required them to update assets and what not. They still have about 400 people working on the game right now, but at this rate, I wouldn't expect to see anything from them until 2019.
     
  16. polonyc2

    polonyc2 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    13,281
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    yup I was thinking 2019 at the earliest
     
  17. J3RK

    J3RK [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,872
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    I'm expecting exactly zero in the way of solid release timeframes. They are in a semi-unique position of not actually having a necessary release window. Cyberpunk has been around since the 80s and has ebbed and flowed with the times. As long as CP2077 is up to the same standards as they've set time and again (give or take a touch) it will be as relevant whenever it releases as if would be now, five years ago, or five years from now.
     
  18. diableri

    diableri Gawd

    Messages:
    646
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Really, really excited for this IP. Always preferred Shadowrun but this is almost as good. Couldn't have hoped for a better company to head it up either. Looking forward to it.
     
  19. jiminator

    jiminator [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,598
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    The character thing, it is described best for example, dark souls. it is not about you so much but about discovering the story of the world. Whereas witcher was the opposite. Will be interesting to see how they go.
     
    J3RK likes this.
  20. Porter_

    Porter_ [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,420
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Leaked info sounds great. I'm excited for this game!
     
  21. Cmustang87

    Cmustang87 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    4,005
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    If anyone were going to create something like this and actually execute on it, it's CDPR.
     
    J3RK, MavericK, Q-BZ and 2 others like this.
  22. MavericK

    MavericK Zero Cool

    Messages:
    28,876
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Yeah, I think I have said it before, but I just hope they do gun combat correctly - that's something new for them.
     
    J3RK likes this.