![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
! Soon the NDA lifts, and the first game to ever inspire me to make a site for it (http://www.trizzeo.com) will be unleashed. WAR is coming .
. Game looks very good.. Don't avoid the game on that account.Might want to check out more recent screenshots/videos, it is actually very detailed and looks nothing like WOW quality-wise. You probably would need a dual-core CPU and an 88xx card/better to max it without antialiasing at 1280x1024. When 100 people are onscreen all casting fairly-good-looking spells and having higher-polygon models, it gets a bit heavy on the system
This has changed since the last trolling he made... healers are good for 1v1 still but not uber. They will get torn up by a melee class generally unless they have a good advantage to start with/range to get ready/start nuking/etc., and stand 40% chance of winning odds against casters. There IS a lot of 1v1 to be had by not going to the keeps and battle objectives, but just patrolling the paths to them or further-out areas, just like DAOC. I bet you'll find quite a healthy amount of 1v1 action after launch, as there's already a lot in beta even on the more populated servers
Might want to check out more recent screenshots/videos, it is actually very detailed and looks nothing like WOW quality-wise. You probably would need a dual-core CPU and an 88xx card/better to max it without antialiasing at 1280x1024. When 100 people are onscreen all casting fairly-good-looking spells and having higher-polygon models, it gets a bit heavy on the system
This has changed since the last trolling he made... healers are good for 1v1 still but not uber. They will get torn up by a melee class generally unless they have a good advantage to start with/range to get ready/start nuking/etc., and stand 40% chance of winning odds against casters. There IS a lot of 1v1 to be had by not going to the keeps and battle objectives, but just patrolling the paths to them or further-out areas, just like DAOC. I bet you'll find quite a healthy amount of 1v1 action after launch, as there's already a lot in beta even on the more populated servers
Might want to retract that before the NDA goes down.
Leaving that NDA up certainly is not doing them any favors, since most of the screen shots they have released make the game look like shit
. People are going to be very surprised at the game's graphics, let alone gameplay, once that time comes. I can certainly understand being worried due to the recent AOC NDA fiasco, though...
Agree with ya on that... the shots circulating are very very old... as Mark Jacobs (game's Producer) has said recently, there's a couple last bugs that need to be squashed that warrant the NDA not lifting until next week sometime. Whether or not you believe that's up to you, but personally I agree with him seeing as how they're going to be fixed by then much more likely than not. I don't agree that they're very severe, but *shrug* not my game to judge that for
You know their will be server connection issues, and new bugs at the beginning that need to be patched. I say for a brand new massive RPG to wait a little bit, let real player reviews come out and get a good feel for the game, see if it lives up to the hype, then after that if it is killer you will know about it and then buy it if you want.
Agree with ya on that... the shots circulating are very very old... as Mark Jacobs (game's Producer) has said recently, there's a couple last bugs that need to be squashed that warrant the NDA not lifting until next week sometime. Whether or not you believe that's up to you, but personally I agree with him seeing as how they're going to be fixed by then much more likely than not. I don't agree that they're very severe, but *shrug* not my game to judge that for
Well I was in the beta 3.1 as of July, and had the game graphics cranked up as high as possible, even though there really is no graphics options in the menu at that time, but the game looked no better than WoW a 5yr old game engine. I expected it to look a million times better more detailed than WoW, but it does not at all.It's been stated MANY times that the BETA is FORCED to LOW graphics. Retail will feature a graphics menu and the option to bump up textures and stuffI love that line GT "the shots circulating are very very old"
I will laugh when the NDA is over and these special new screenshots come out, and it looks barely any better. Please post a side by side screen of the July 3.1 build compared to the retail release build, everyone is making it sound like it will be night and day better, which I sure hope, but knowing hype I don't buy into it.
To me when I played the beta I was thinking really old school cheap graphic enegine. I want to see a big difference in graphics compared to like something EverQuest 1 to EverQuest 2 difference, anything less and this game engine blows