To most people, the model number is utterly meaningless. The might look at a couple of reviews when they buy something and pick one from the review and then promptly forget the largely irrelevant model number.
They aren't nerds who follows generations of videocards looking for a commonality of a couple of digits between then generation and then moaning when the those digits in the model cost more.
Maybe that was AMDs master naming plan. Keep changing names so the Model Number nerds can't figure out what they should be complaining about.
R9 Fury ->RX 580 -> Vega 64 -> Radeon VII -> RX 5700 How am I supposed to know if I should be complaining about price increases if they keep changing the naming scheme?![]()
That was ancillary portion of post, or at least it was supposed to be. The idea is the position the cards are supposed to take, not the naming conventions. I'm more concerned with there being this divide between high end cards and everything else. If the 3060 is now low high end, there'll likely be fewer good mid ranged options where you get any kind of real return generation over generation. I just think it's a bad place for consumers to be in where there's now essentially 5+ high end skus at the beginning of a line up.
Also if you want to be pedantic about it, it's not hard to figure out AMDs naming conventions up until vega. 200 series through the 500 series were consistent. 280 -> 580 were all mid-range. Until they decided to get weird with the 590, vega, and rdna it was fairly straight forward.
Last edited: