-(Xyphox)-
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
- Messages
- 6,518
another galaxy, man you must have the world's biggest porn collection to need that much space, LOL
Looks awesome so far
Looks awesome so far
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which IPMI card did you get?
At what load? 100% or mostly idle? I can leave my 25W p3s fanless, but that chip is still an 80W part.
another galaxy, man you must have the world's biggest porn collection to need that much space, LOL
Looks awesome so far![]()
I got the AOC-SIMSO part, about $65 and came with just the daughtercard and installation CD, but I think I'm going to return it because I just realized there's an AOC-SIMSO+ part that is $40 more but comes with a cable and PCI bracket with RJ45 port, which I have a hunch makes it true out-of-band in case motherboard crashes. With the AOC-SIMSO part I got, I'd assumed I'd just be using an unused ethernet port on the motherboard to do the KVM-over-LAN. I plugged the card in and it works fine but I haven't really messed with it. AOC-SIMSO+ pic and specs are here to show you what i'm talking about http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/SIM.cfm
I wouldn't call it "stuck" - those are great drives based on all the benchmarks. Were you planning on still going JBOD or are you starting to think RAID5/RAID6? Would be an aweful shame to run an Areca 24-port just for JBOD (except for the caching). I thought I read there's a fix for the TLER thing.
FYI - I have a contact that deals in large quantities of hard-drives from all the major manufacturers (another distributor) and he stated today that most 1Tb HD sku's are slated to drop substantially in price after Jan 1. I am going to wait to see if this happens and run my 12 x 500gb existing drives JBOD for now and then migrate to 1Tb's in january.
Areca 1280ML just arrived.
........
Checkout this overkill of a manual!
Yea but how many different languages is it in?
1 - English
Nice RAID controller! So did you be a good boy and follow instructions by reading that card first and not eat the silica gel packet?![]()
Read Instructions? Pssshh. I usually put the Silica gel in water... because I'm that easily amused![]()
Next step: To find a stick of DDR2 667 2GB memory that will work with that controller. With memory prices so dirt cheap, i'd be a fool not to max out the controller cache![]()
LOL
I really like that controller, thinking about ordering one for myself today, any thoughts on it, now that you have it in person... Also, how well do you think it will fit in Plutonium 3???
I'd be curious to know how fast the controller handles an array expansion or raid level morphing (ie Raid5->Raid6). I've been testing my system with O/S installed on a test bench as I await the 24-bay Supermicro case. I tested my Adaptec 31605 16-port card with 15 x Hitachi 1Tb drives set up in Raid5 on this X7DWN+ mobo. The array build only took an hour, but when I added the 16th drive and told it to expand the array, it ended up taking 36 hours!I guess that's not the end of the world, though my next thought was to wonder if a failed drive array rebuild might take anywhere as long. I tested removing a drive from the array and plugging in a fresh-out-of-box drive, and array repair time was about the same as the array build (1 hr 10 min or so) so I'm opting for the extra space and sticking with raid 5 over extra parity with raid6. Read and write performance is amazing with this many drives in the array even though the controller only has 256mb memory.
For kicks I also installed 32Gb of ram on this mobo (running Win2003 Server Enterprise R2 x64), set up a 24gb ram drive, and did some testing. A gigabyte file took less than two seconds to copy with the ramdrive as both the source and destination. I ran a few other tests like 4 x dvdshrink sessions working off VIDEO_TS folders located on the ramdrive, and suddenly the absense of a second CPU was the bottleneck rather than a harddisk!
Just wanted to give an update on the IPMI card:
The card I got is a slightly different model (AOC-SIM1U+), but I'm guessing all the same features:
full remote java-based console
virtual drives (floppy, CD, etc)
full sensor readings (temps, volts, RPM's, everything)
remote power on/off/reset
it even supports dyndns to update your external IP
you can set IP access rules and force HTTPS/"KVM" encryption
setup user/group access with different access levels
even sync the time with a NTP server
Basically everything I could ever want in a remote access card and much more.
Read Instructions? Pssshh. I usually put the Silica gel in water... because I'm that easily amused![]()
Next step: To find a stick of DDR2 667 2GB memory that will work with that controller. With memory prices so dirt cheap, i'd be a fool not to max out the controller cache![]()
Oooh, drop it in water, an even better idea.
Wow, 2 GB of memory for a friggin controller. People are still buying PCs today that don't have that much RAM. That'll be a killer RAID controller.![]()
With that much cache memory, if write-caching is enabled that card better either have its own battery for backup, or else the system should be run on a good UPS. Because of the amount of data I'm depending on my own new system to maintain, I invested in an online UPS and demoted my other UPS (line-interactive based) to non-essential equipment. As you may know, a true online UPS is more expensive than line-interactive UPS's, and with good reason: it uses a double-conversion process whereby the AC power gets converted to DC and charges the battery, then the DC power from the battery is converted back to AC and is output as a pure sine wave. Think of it as reverse osmosis for electrical power. Since in effect the equipment is running off a battery all the time, this double-conversion process totally isolates the output power from the input power. Any nasty surprises and irregularities coming from the wall outlet affect only the battery charger, and not the output load. There's also zero transfer time in the event of a power outage (unlike line interactive UPS's), since the equipment is already running off the battery. With an online UPS you are effectively increasing the MTBF on the computer's power supply(s) since they never get stressed by dirty power/anomalies. So you might ask, what if the battery in an online UPS fails? Well most if not all online UPS's have MULTIPLE batteries (mine has 8, in a 2U rackspace) so if one or more batteries fail you simply have a little less battery runtime because they're all load sharing. Further, some people/companies go as far as plugging a server/computer with dual power supplies into two separate UPS's for even more redundancy.
Reason I bring this up is, while we're all talking about best-of-breed components and such, to point out diffs in UPS's that I didn't pay much attention to until recently, and I thought there may be others that didn't know or never paid attention. I realized the extra expense of an online UPS is far outweighed by the value of the data being protected.
Years ago I lost a "redundant" *cough* array of 6 x 300GB harddrives in Raid5 after a power surge. Even though they were plugged into a "surge protector", when the power came back on all six drives were doing the "click of death" and I had no backup (though mostly movie data, so not a huge deal). Since then I ONLY use a UPS (and more recently, a true online UPS).
I'm looking to put my entire home on a UPS system with standby backup.*/dreams*
Ockie when are you gonna start building this thing?
Well good news, the SuperMicro 24 bay case just came into stock at a distributor so SuperMicro stuck to their ETA commitment - yowza! They also have a silver edition besides the black one, I noticed. I'll have my filthy mitts on the black one tomorrow.
So, keep your eyes peeled on the e-tailer sites since it should be any day that they show up into stock!
You know, I was just going to run a couple of Adaptec 16-port raid controllers since I got them for 75% off - except that 24-port Areca is starting to eat at me, since it seems ideal for this server case given the match to the drive bays.
Question is, and I haven't been able to find the answer even in the 1280ML's PDF manual, is there any reason the controller would NOT support a 24-drive Raid5 or Raid6 array? I know, i know - losing a 23Tb raid array in one shot due to controller failure or something would not be fun.. but my data is nearline anyway and i'd have backups for important stuff.
I never really took Areca seriously because I just thought it was (foreign)-made junk and the thought of trusting my data to a controller that has english misspellings in its BIOS menu not to mention the silly and misspelled product packaging had me worried about quality control (or lack of). However, after realizing that Tekram is the company behind the Areca cards, it was "say no more". I've been using Tekram cache controllers and products since the early 90's - they know what they're doing.