OLED is not good for much else.I can't wait to see some specs. Did they say "monitor" or gaming monitor <- that's the important question for me.
Why do you think they will be only 60hz? LG OLED tv have been 120hz for a couple years. I do expect the monitors to be stupid expensive cause it is a "gaming/Pro" monitor.Pretty certain to be 60hz if they didn't mention anything. Also, I'm guessing since it is a pro monitor my guess is that it will be $4,999 as a price. Also, by "soon" I bet it will be available in the 2nd half of 2021. But maybe I a bit jaded ;-)
I am assuming because it is a 'pro' monitor. Plus, I don't think this monitor has the same type of oled panel that the LG TV's have.Why do you think they will be only 60hz? LG OLED tv have been 120hz for a couple years. I do expect the monitors to be stupid expensive cause it is a "gaming" monitor.
Or you could wall mount a 48" OLED right now and move your desk back a foot.All I want is 32' 4k 144hz+... It'll be another 4-5 years is my guess.
So it is going to be a low volume stupid expansive monitor like all the other OLED monitors released over the years.flatpanelhd says this isn't an LG panel, so it being 60hz is not that unusual. There aren't that many sources for OLED panels, so it may be a JOLED or Sony panel and in that case 60hz and $5-$10K++ pricing is likely.
Not really buyable IMO unless all of those things are wrong.
My desk is built into my wall 😂 most circumstances probably not a bad idea.Or you could wall mount a 48" OLED right now and move your desk back a foot.
Or later this year, wall mount the 42" and move your desk back 6 inches
So it is going to be a low volume stupid expansive monitor like all the other OLED monitors released over the years.
Of course. OLED will never be suitable for the consumer desktop market unless signifigant advances are made with the technology, or another type of emissive panel supercedes it.
You're living in the past man. Plenty of people on this forum are already using them as monitors.
Keep waiting Felicia. Your missing out.Plenty of people using TV's as monitors, yeah. I'll pass. Let me know when they make something under 40".
We are jumping, but I believe if it was a 120hz panel then they would have put that as a major point in the press release.Has there actually been solid confirmation that the LG is a 60Hz monitor or are we just jumping to conclusions?
Yeah. I am thinking the same thing. 48 inch is still too big. But i can probably make due with a 42... Too bad they probably wont be out until the end of 2021.its got the word "pro" in it, so you know what that means: $$$$
wouldn't surprise me if this went 2-3k
I'm more interested in the 42inch tv. Thats almost small enough for me consider
Keep waiting Felicia. Your missing out.
Pretty sure there's not a law against bring your PC into the living room. Get a wireless KB+M and you're in businessI have an OLED TV in my living room where it belongs, but thanks
Pretty sure there's not a law against bring your PC into the living room. Get a wireless KB+M and you're in business
Finally, someone else on this forum who works on a built-in! I was being to feel like I was losing my mind, probably because this sort of setup doesn’t seem to be one that most people can imagine a sane person having. Still, I’m glad to see that someone gets it.My desk is built into my wall 😂 most circumstances probably not a bad idea.
I'm just wondering why they can't acknowledge that it's mainly used as a monitor and actually make it a monitor (i.e. with a proper stand and has DisplayPort inputs).They also introduced a new 42 inch panel for those who want tv as a monitor.
I'm just wondering why they can't acknowledge that it's mainly used as a monitor and actually make it a monitor (i.e. with a proper stand and has DisplayPort inputs).![]()
HDMI 2.1 might be superior to DisplayPort 1.4 in terms of bandwidth, but DisplayPort (and DP Alt Mode) are much more compatible with interfaces like USB-C/Thunderbolt. I don't think there are any laptops with HDMI 2.1 right now, but there are plenty that can output a DisplayPort HBR3 (1.4) stream via Alt Mode. The adapters needed to go USB-C to DisplayPort are thus much simpler and more reliable than USB-C to HDMI 2.1.Eh HDMI 2.1 is currently superior to DisplayPort for the time being so the lack of it shouldn't really be missed. Would be nice if they started to make use of DP 2.0 though.
HDMI 2.1 might be superior to DisplayPort 1.4 in terms of bandwidth, but DisplayPort (and DP Alt Mode) are much more compatible with interfaces like USB-C/Thunderbolt. I don't think there are any laptops with HDMI 2.1 right now, but there are plenty that can output a DisplayPort HBR3 (1.4) stream via Alt Mode. The adapters needed to go USB-C to DisplayPort are thus much simpler and more reliable than USB-C to HDMI 2.1.
Plus, the only video cards that have HDMI 2.1 right now are unable to be purchased anywhere at the moment.HDMI 2.1 might be superior to DisplayPort 1.4 in terms of bandwidth, but DisplayPort (and DP Alt Mode) are much more compatible with interfaces like USB-C/Thunderbolt. I don't think there are any laptops with HDMI 2.1 right now, but there are plenty that can output a DisplayPort HBR3 (1.4) stream via Alt Mode. The adapters needed to go USB-C to DisplayPort are thus much simpler and more reliable than USB-C to HDMI 2.1.
How many devices output 2.1 though? Those of us with older hardware would prefer DP support for our aging hardware.Eh HDMI 2.1 is currently superior to DisplayPort for the time being so the lack of it shouldn't really be missed. Would be nice if they started to make use of DP 2.0 though.