SynergyDustin
n00b
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Messages
- 48
All are updated to 2.02 already by our techs. Once purchased its up to the customer to update firmware, although it is my understanding that an HP Raid controller is required to do so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Considering a single 2 TB drive can stream at 120 MB/s a 1.5Gbps link can be almost saturated including protocol overhead. Not to mention that I have to connect SSDs directly to the controller as some of these can already cap a 3.0 Gbps link.
Can the firmware revision of the expander be determined using a Non-HP controller?
You can have a 1m long cable between the expander and HBA and then another 1m cable between the drives and expander. That won't be a problem.
Yes.so I take it the signal is resent from the expander ala a switch?
You can have a 1m long cable between the expander and HBA and then another 1m cable between the drives and expander. That won't be a problem.
. This means, for now, that the power switch on my power supply is going to have to function as the "On/Off" switch for the case until I do some more testing.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I wasn't able to get the expander working with 3.0 Gbps drive-side. Does anyone have it working at that speed with an LSI 1068E or SAS2008 based controller? I'm using fan-out cables to connect the drives. Can this be the reason?
The problem is not, that it does not work. The drives just run at 1.5Gbps with two different brands of cables ...
Thank You for sharing your solution to mounting the HP Expander in a Norco. I have just completed my install with a Norco 4220. I did have to drill custom holes AND remove the large black connectors on the backside. The 4220 has a raised motherboard mounting surface which would not allow perfect mounting with the underside connectors attached. The question I have concerns the power switch. Have you figured out how to use the case on/off switch to control the power?
The HP Sas expander appears to be quite sensitive on cable's condition, I've had one group of drives running at 3Gbps and the other runnng on 1.5Gbps and the only difference between the sets is that one cable has slightly more tension on it than the other and may be potentially closer to some internalpower cables.The problem is not, that it does not work. The drives just run at 1.5Gbps with two different brands of cables (Delock and AMCC 3ware).
The HP Sas expander appears to be quite sensitive on cable's condition, I've had one group of drives running at 3Gbps and the other runnng on 1.5Gbps and the only difference between the sets is that one cable has slightly more tension on it than the other and may be potentially closer to some internalpower cables.
The fanout cables I have don't have the plastic mold around the internal cabling like normal sata do, so they are quite flexible and probably will damage easily.
What firmware version is on the expander? The early fw version only supported sata at 1.5g.
For staggered spinup support on the chenbro backplane, I think you need to set a jumper or dip switch in the chassis.
I wasn't able to get the expander working with 3.0 Gbps drive-side. Does anyone have it working at that speed with an LSI 1068E or SAS2008 based controller? I'm using fan-out cables to connect the drives. Can this be the reason?
3.0 Gbps is working for me through the HP SAS expander. I am using the supermicro SAS2008 based controller. It lists the max link speed as 6.0 Gbps but all the drives show a 3 Gbps link in the BIOS utility.
..., so it's a bit more of a pain.
...you didn't use a null modem cable? That's all it takes. Intel didn't do anything backwards and uses the standard pin-outs. Would have saved you a lot of trouble.
I am not sure why the connection speed is reduced, though. Might be a protocol issue, the cable, probably the fact that I have a couple of old Maxtor drives connected to the expander for testing that are not capable of SATA300. Maybe the expander reduces speed for the other connected disks if it detects slow devices among them. More testing to do, I guess.