KenshinNX60
n00b
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2005
- Messages
- 29
deleted
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
KenshinNX60 said:Nevermind.....YEA This may not be much of an overclock for most, but to me its almost as good as my good ole 3500+. I got my Sempron 2800+ 64 to 2402.7mhz or 2.4ghz that is a 800mhz overclock I could go much more, but I want to wait until tomarrow when I get a Zalman 92mm heatsink fan or a thermaltake Big typhoon from compusa, some artic silver 5 and a North bridge cooler/fan.
Haven't done any test like sandra or 3dmark yet, but surely will. I have a CPU-Z pic I will post it as soon as I find my cable for my camera or I'll just borrow my moms. Never thought a cheap processor like this would go so far, Igot a lucky draw.
My goal is to get to 2.6 or 2.7 ghz on air thats a 1ghz overclock and right now im on stock cooling w/stock thermal paste or pad whatever AMD calls it. Idle now: 32.2c full load (well while playin medal of honor or something/windows media player) 36.3-38.9c
fobis said:LOL. I'm pretty sure P-Dub was saying that 939's aren't able to overclock as high as 754's. He was never saying that 754's couldn't go that high...
And honestly, get a clue, dude, the 754's and 939's have different architectures, different memory controllers, etc. That's why the 754's can generally clock higher than the 939's. But, as mentioned by P-Dub and many others multiple times, the 939 CPU's destroy the 754's.
And, oh, yes, just for your information, overclocking DOES require luck and not purely skill. Yes, you have to have some knowledge of how to properly overclock A64's, but you still have to have luck with your motherboard, RAM, and CPU. For example, every single A64 3200+ won't overclock the same. Some may go to 2.4GHz, some may go higher or even lower. I think you can get the picture, even with that thick head of yours.
Anyways, now to the serious post for the INTELLIGENT people **coughnotserge84cough**
I'm thinking of getting an Opteron 165 and some mATX board. I've read through this whole freaking thread and I still haven't reached a conclusion. Should I get the Biostar TForce6100-939 for the Foxconn 6150K8MA-8EKRS? I plan to oveclock the crap out of the Opteron 165 (hopefully to 290*9 or something close) in conjunction with 2 sticks of 1GB PC4000 RAM.
I know that the Biostar board is known for its insane overclocking, but it seems to be that the 754 board is in fact the one that overclocks insanely high (due to the CPU's, mainly) and not the 939 board.
The Foxconn board, on the other hand, has a few more features than the Biostar board such as the 7.1ch audio and the Gbit Ethernet adapter. However, this is known to go to a max of 175HTT or something like that.
So I'm in this dilemna and I can't choose which board to get. Can anyone help? Which would be better for the overclocking and stability? I don't really care about the 7.1ch audio or the GBit LAN as I don't have a surround sound system or a GBit Network.
Thanks in advance,
-fobis
KenshinNX60 said:oh yea best buy has a 120gb hard drive western digital on sale for 59 dollars (no rebates instant savings) IDE not SATA but still a very good deal just thought sumone ppl would like to kno imma get one of those babies today
on topic how do you change the multiplier dont see how to mines at 8 wanna try diffent numbers
KenshinNX60 said:I will surely try to go 380 but uh as far as cooling to help to get this far you think i should get a north bridge fan
And I am thinking about getting a Blue orb 2 heatsink fan from ebay cause it isnt in any store matches my case and is alot cheaper than the zalman but similar design it gets 77.8CFM and its super quiet 17dBA for only 58bucks. You think this will clear my case well really clear my PSU and memory its a 120mm fan and the copper fins. MAybe ill move the memory to slot two for more room ill be upgrading to a gig pc3200 anyway.
blue orb 2:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6815360601&fromMakeTrack=true
My case:
http://www.hardwareforums.com/gallery/showimage.php?i=382&c=2
and of course profile shots:
http://www.hardwareforums.com/gallery/showimage.php?i=303&c=2
http://www.hardwareforums.com/gallery/showimage.php?i=305&c=2
Smoove910 said:Socket 939 T-Force 939 modded BIOS downloads here...
http://lejabeach.com/Biostar/6100-939/6100939bios.html
Serge84 said:A blue orb 2 is deff a good system cooler, cools the intire board. I may get one. A 80mm memory fan is too hard to mob in this new case I have. That would be perfect for extreme cooling. There are others like that too. This one looks to be the best, that airflow is insane. Copper will give you good heat resistance and the aluminum fins will bring the heat away faster then just a all copper heatsink. This is really nice.
vibe said:You know everyone always says that "in theory" part about mixed copper and aluminum heatsinks but they never work quite as well as all copper, as long as there is good airflow. The Zalman 7700-cu is pure copper and without the "extra surface area" on the fins, yet I remember seeing a review where it's 2c cooler in the same setup as the blue orb 2. There's a another clone of the Zalman somewhere else too. Can anyone find a consise review of all the heatsinks like that?
emptyshell said:I think you would have some clearance issues for starters if you tried using a GPU fan on a CPU.... but if u wanna try it, go ahead an tell us your results![]()
Smoove910 said:Just wondering if you need 2.9 vdimm on your ram if you have a divider on it.
Just was curious that since you are essentially running at 208 fsb respectively, why would that require 2.9vdimm?? Isn't that close enough to stock to allow for 2.6-2.7vdimm area?kunsunoke said:Just revamped the wife's rig, using the Tforce S939
Processor - Venice core 3200+ running at 2.5 GHz / 1.55 Volts Core
Multiplier - 10X (stock)
FSB - 250 MHz
HTT - 4x
HSF - Thermalright XC-90
Memory - 2xCVR DDR400 CL2.5 and 2xKingmax DDR400 CL2.5.
Memory voltage - 2.90V
Memory divider set to 166 (thus running the sticks at 208 MHz at CL2.5)
Video - On-board; chipset thermal interface replaced by Ceramique
Come on now, seriously...... heat conduction and electrical conduction have high correlation, because both are largely based on electron flow. Everyone knows that copper is a better conductor than aluminum. Aluminum is only used in heatsinks because it is lightweight and possibly easier to manufacture. Don't get into whack theories about "Copper is a better material for heat resistance and will keep it at a temp longer, aluminum is better for heat to be dstributed faster away" unless you really know what you are talking about here even though you say it is your "oppnion".Serge84 said:Its how you look at it as your oppinion, depending on airflow, you may not even tell the diff. The diff from copper is that it will stay hotter for longer. Aluminum does not. Copper is a better material for heat resistance and will keep it at a temp longer, aluminum is better for heat to be dstributed faster away. Aluminum will result in your cpu cooling down faster depending on the surface area. Copper is better in its ways like aluminum is, combineing the 2 is the best solution. Well now I have a max cool copper base with aluminum and nickle coated fins with a high performance fan. Works very well for how small it is. In oppnion now.
Pwned! QFT.mr-busta said:Come on now, seriously...... heat conduction and electrical conduction have high correlation, because both are largely based on electron flow. Everyone knows that copper is a better conductor than aluminum. Aluminum is only used in heatsinks because it is lightweight and possibly easier to manufacture. Don't get into whack theories about "Copper is a better material for heat resistance and will keep it at a temp longer, aluminum is better for heat to be dstributed faster away" unless you really know what you are talking about here even though you say it is your "oppnion".
Serge84 said:Its how you look at it as your oppinion, depending on airflow, you may not even tell the diff. The diff from copper is that it will stay hotter for longer. Aluminum does not. Copper is a better material for heat resistance and will keep it at a temp longer, aluminum is better for heat to be dstributed faster away. Aluminum will result in your cpu cooling down faster depending on the surface area. Copper is better in its ways like aluminum is, combineing the 2 is the best solution. Well now I have a max cool copper base with aluminum and nickle coated fins with a high performance fan. Works very well for how small it is. In oppnion now.
Yep, 2.9Vdimm works without even needing to loosen timings. Phew! ....Now if I can only break this 2.64Ghz CPU wall.mr-busta said:I'll see if I can drop it to 2.9V and loosen up timings.
mr-busta said:Yeah, 3.3V is kinda high for those poor Value RAMs. But, I'm actually more concerned about giving the processor 3.3V for the mem controller, I laid down a pretty penny for that thing.
I'll see if I can drop it to 2.9V and loosen up timings.
Yeah, it's been fixed on B02 and later BIOSes. I'm currently using the C02, and its pretty stable so far.aiya said:any of you guys have problems with setting your htt to 3x but it goes to 4x instead? i just encountered this problem and wondering if you guys have a solution. i'm using bios CU51MA12RH from the the rhcf website.
mr-busta said:Yeah, it's been fixed on B02 and later BIOSes. I'm currently using the C02, and its pretty stable so far.
I use SiSoft Sandra to check HTT multi, look for it in one of the memory info screens.sabrewolf732 said:how you guys checking your htt multi? Also my board is seriously undervolting my proc, 1.488v when I put 1.55 in bios >_>