DaedalusHelios
2[H]4U
- Joined
- May 19, 2008
- Messages
- 2,265
make that practitioners "lol no edit available"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
God is dead he's been replaced by the Big Bang (another scientific concensus) & when Jesus comes back again those Sunday preachers will be the first to crucify him again. The church poor box has been replaced by the "great society" run by the government & who oversees what the government does? The government appointed overseers of course. Why is that? Because we trusted our representatives to do the right things for us. Well they didn't. The Republicrats are all in the men's room at the airport & the Democans are lining their pockets with our $ & trying to hold on to the power to do that. Shutting down opposing voices will do for a start. Elections have consequences. It's time to vote the incumbents out.
Who wrote that, oh yeah Charlie Rangle, another tax cheat, you know a citizen tried the Geithner "Turbo Tax mistake" defense at a tax evasion hearing & that defense was thrown out for him. But it was ok for the G man.
The Republicrats are all in the men's room at the airport
You're the one that suggested revoking tax exempt status from churches. Taking more money from them = more good they can do? LOLNonprofits are tax exempt. You fail at tax law.
You're the one that suggested revoking tax exempt status from churches. Taking more money from them = more good they can do? LOL
Again: you fail.
See Exemption From Self-Employment (SE) Tax
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p517/ar02.html#en_US_publink100033546
They can file differently and especially if they are Christian Science Practioners.
Yeah, I'm going to have to agree with TechniSooner. You do fail hard, LOL.I am guessing you are around 12. Otherwise I would simply ask you to stay out of grown up discussions in the future.
Yeah, I'm going to have to agree with TechniSooner. You do fail hard, LOL.
Way to take the context of my entire point out of the picture. I originally used this as an example that Government control is NOT the answer. They screwed the pooch on the California deal big time.
You also must've missed the part where I said Enron made it worse. I am not defending them at all, Mr. Troll. What they did was wrong and I won't argue with it. My point was that the GOVERNMENT OF CALIFONIA caused their own energy crisis. Period. But somehow since the FEDERAL government is involved, they think THEIR variations will work better. I think not.
Holy smokes, I bet 99.9999999% of you would get withdrawal symptoms if you didn't check your email/look at porn/twitter/facebook/myspace every single day.
Me? I could care less if the President took control of the internet. Life would still go on.
Holy smokes, I bet 99.9999999% of you would get withdrawal symptoms if you didn't check your email/look at porn/twitter/facebook/myspace every single day.
Me? I could care less if the President took control of the internet. Life would still go on.
And that is because it's paid by the church itself, as part of the payroll tax. Same with any non profit.
Got any more I can answer for you?
Election by Church Employees Who Are Opposed to Social Security and Medicare
You may be able to choose to be exempt from social security and Medicare taxes, including the SE tax, if you work for a church (or church-controlled nonprofit division) that does not pay the employer's part of the social security tax on wages. You can make the choice if you are a member of a religious sect or division opposed to social security and Medicare. This exemption does not apply to your service, if any, as a minister of a church or as a member of a religious order.
You can make this choice by filing Form 4029. See Requesting ExemptionForm 4029, later, under Members of Recognized Religious Sects.
Holy smokes, I bet 99.9999999% of you would get withdrawal symptoms if you didn't check your email/look at porn/twitter/facebook/myspace every single day.
Me? I could care less if the President took control of the internet. Life would still go on.
Just saying "You fail" back and forth is just childish and insulting. Then again thats [H] for you.
But calling people 12 years old is clearly the ticket.
The controversy dates back to April when Senators Olympia Snowe and Jay Rockefeller drafted S-773, a bill that, in its original form, did have some seriously bad ideas in it. For example, in an emergency, the president could “order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal Government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network.”
Outrage predictably followed. And the bill got better, much better. I’ve just read a draft of the whole thing. (Click here to read it too.) And there’s nothing in it that merits the current outrage.
Most of the bill, in the draft I read, proposes ways to improve our cyber-security infrastructure. It recommends scholarships for kids who want to work on cyber security (good idea!) and prizes to inspire contests that will get people to do things in the field (good idea!).
The formerly onerous section, which begins on p.25, has been changed to the following:
In the event of an immediate threat to strategic national interests involving compromised Federal Government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network — [the president] may declare a cybersecurity emergency; and may, if the President finds it necessary for the national defense and security, and in coordination with relevant industry sectors, direct the national response to the cyber threat and the timely restoration of the affected critical infrastructure information system or network.
Notice all the hedging. He “may”, “may”, “if he finds it necessary”, “in coordination.” And then they payoff? He can “direct the national response”!
That’s not giving him any powers that he doesn’t already have, and there’s no justification in that language for the hysteria. It is also much more in sync with what Obama himself has said. He has been very clear that he doesn’t want to snoop on private networks, much less take them over.
If Obama doesn't want to govern the internet, then why introduce the bill at all?
Bills are amendable. Once passed, they're going to play with it over time. You just watch.
he just wants to be able to disconnect from Xbox live when he is losing in Madden without getting hit with a quit/lost on his ranking...
But calling people 12 years old is clearly the ticket.
Insulting someone for a negative response, and feeling good about getting it, is simply childish. I was insulted, I responded, and thats what immaturity wants. I played right into it. I did not start with insults. I responded to them in an indecent manner. I will try not to make that mistake again. If I roll in the mud with pigs of [H], I will get dirty.
Just read the link and find what I am talking about:
It is a feature only held by people working for, and in effect the religious institution itself.
Just saying "You fail" back and forth is just childish and insulting. Then again thats [H] for you.
Yeah, and when they turn 65, they don't get to collect social security, medicare, or medicaide either.
It's a fools option IMHO. And it's nothing you need to worry about. Smart people pay that tax.
WOW. It seems that a large percentage of [H] are avid Glenn Beck viewers.
Bye Obama, don't let the door hit you on the way out in 2013.
WOW. It seems that a large percentage of [H] are avid Glenn Beck viewers.
No, were just American's that still believe in freedom.