![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
I saw those challenges but I didn't complete any of them nor did I look at what they were exactly about, they're mostly just cosmetics? That's why people mostly repaired tanks, to get some kind of sticker
Second beta starts Thursday 14th of August @08:00 UTC, but for some reason it ends on Sunday 17th @08:00 UTC. Essentially you don't get to play much or at all on Sunday so it is 3 days, instead of 4 this time around. No other betas have been announced so might actually have to wait for about 8 weeks after that, until 10th of October, for the full release.
Highly unlikely we will get an early release. I wish demos would make a comeback. Back with BF2 they released a demo, one map (Gulf of Oman) Conquest only (BF was strictly conquest back then) but you could play it as long as you’d like. I actually hosted the most popular demo server in the world for a while until my employer at the time told me to shut it down due to bandwidth costs at our data center.
i thought someone post in here that anticheat wasnt on for the beta
thats what makes it look fake to me, just snaps from enemy to enemy.
big time. more are doing it as more people demand them, keep grumbling.
There are some players that can snap close that fast from enemy to enemy and track similarly without cheats, but they would be hindered by visibility in some of those situations (especially the walls and smoke). The main giveaway for me is that it pretty much always lands in the same place on the enemy model. Also if their aim is that good they would try to start of with a headshot on the first player, before moving to the body, when they start with 0 bloom/spread. On the second and third guy it makes more sense to move towards body shots because you might still have bloom/spread on your gun.
The EA anti cheat service runs and uses ressources at least (CPU, RAM, disk). And yes, it stops when the game is closed, and does not start with Windows. Less intrusive than something like Punkbuster (for example) which BF used to have.
thats good at least
Disagree, a single cheater can ruin the game. It doesn't happen in a vacuum. Players from the opposing team will quit the match when they encounter someone blatantly cheating, now one team is not only outnumbered but dealing with a single OP operator thanks to them cheating, which causes more people to quit.
Could be that they have another part to their anti-cheat that will only be enabled on launch and that part requires TPM. Would make sense to give cheaters time to buy the game before mass banning. Some cheaters will even rebuy the game and new cheats so it can be good business as well.
It's actually quite surprising how much difference one player can make in a BF game, even if they aren't cheating. For example, if one team has an ace of a pilot that the opposing team can't challenge with their own ace, it's game over and won't even be close. Dude will just be bombing infantry and rocketing armor the entire round. Once you get another jet/chopper up there to challenge them, they're busy dog fighting while the ground war continues.
The server will get filled. I remember some cheater in a tank in bf5 that was wrecking everyone. Beside that one game, the few other encounters I had were forgettable. play a game like overwatch where its 5v5, a cheater in that ruins the game. you get penalized for leaving the match. battlefield, join another server.
It’ll get filled via matchmaking putting people in, then once they see their team getting destroyed thanks to the cheater they quit almost immediately. You’re never going to make that deficit up. The round will end with a lop sided result almost every time with very few people left at the end who where there at the beginning.
You thought it was going to? Lol
No I did not, but there are enough people who have been hoping it would. Lol (I don't know why I am loling, but apparently that makes my post more persuasive).
