AMD Zen Performance Preview

Discussion in 'AMD Processors' started by HardOCP News, Aug 24, 2016.

  1. FrgMstr

    FrgMstr Just Plain Mean Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,331
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    I am damn near dead on. The results from my timer using the live stream are ~35.75 seconds.
     
  2. Gideon

    Gideon 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,247
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Glad to hear you replicated their result Kyle, makes it far less likely that anything was being hidden or distorted. Now the question is will this result carry over into other tasks.
     
  3. FrgMstr

    FrgMstr Just Plain Mean Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,331
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    Well, you are trying to match results from a different CPU architecture with less cores. I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish with that hardware in relation to what AMD showed us this week.
     
  4. Teenyman45

    Teenyman45 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,294
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Now watch AMD finally come out with a part almost as good as Intel's but completely screw up pricing it like they did with the Fury and 7900 series gpus.
     
  5. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,362
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    agree that they don't need to outright win, if they can get close with a competitive price this will definitely give people more options. i really do hope it's able to be competitive because i'd like to go back to supporting AMD products.
     
    muxr, toddw, Burticus and 1 other person like this.
  6. ebduncan

    ebduncan [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,006
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    I will say I am bit more excited for Ryzen, or Zen what ever they want to call it.

    They come straight out and say 3.4ghz base speed which I think took everyone by surprise. Esp when people were predicting them to be low 3ghz max speed parts. Now that is all left to see is how high can go, and of course a much wider benchmark suite.

    Glad I've held out on a upgrade for so long, appears it was worth waiting for.
     
  7. FrgMstr

    FrgMstr Just Plain Mean Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,331
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    Fixed the 6700 typo errors. Muscle memory and in a rush to get it up before I had to leave to get the kids from practice. DOH!
     
  8. Moonjock

    Moonjock Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    240
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
  9. pendragon1

    pendragon1 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    13,301
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    wow went quiet in here all of a sudden! whered all the tin-foil hats go? still think amd was lying and giving out false info, faking tests and hiding altered settings? geez....
     
    Pieter3dnow, JustReason and N4CR like this.
  10. SighTurtle

    SighTurtle [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,412
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2016
    Its not too far to suspect AMD is lying...history informs the future. But, its good everything is resolved, now time for launch and hopefully a HardOCP review soon after.
     
  11. Palladium@SG

    Palladium@SG Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    284
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2015
    Because the last time Core 2 was destroying A64 in everything Intel was sending pre-release samples to everybody to test, instead of just leaking numbers for just one specific app?
     
    Syntax_Error and EuphoricRage470 like this.
  12. razor1

    razor1 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,155
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Its one application, we should really wait for other tests, added to this the last two time AMD had something good, K8 and A64, they were chest pounding a month before release. Now having said that, AMD keeping quiet can still be very good, because we saw that chest pounding with their GPU's and CPU's (phenom) were just disappointments (we kinda can throw BD in there too, because it was an AMD employee that blew it out of the water even though it wasn't done by official channels), so it could just be an apprehension of what the backlash was or they have learned a lesson.
     
  13. trick0502

    trick0502 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,134
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    If zen was destroying intel, I'm sure they send out samples to everyone too. What we're looking at is a part that is on par with current intel offerings.
     
    Revdarian likes this.
  14. Nenu

    Nenu [H]ardened

    Messages:
    18,789
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Can you link us to the last time this wasnt an issue?
     
  15. razor1

    razor1 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,155
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    A64, 4xxx line, those were along time ago lol.
     
    pendragon1 likes this.
  16. THUMPer

    THUMPer 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,006
    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    [​IMG]

    Kyle didn't you mention AMD should spell check their slides?
     
  17. pendragon1

    pendragon1 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    13,301
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    id have to check their join dates...
     
    Pieter3dnow and JustReason like this.
  18. Palladium@SG

    Palladium@SG Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    284
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2015
    Matching Intel HEDT per core is already destroying Intel. AMD's current CPUs are in such shambles that they have nothing to lose by previewing samples.
     
    knowom likes this.
  19. FrgMstr

    FrgMstr Just Plain Mean Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,331
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    Damn, guess I did not save after I fixed that.
     
  20. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,250
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    IN the immortal words of John Carmack...

    WHEN IT'S DONE!
     
    rgMekanic, blkt and razor1 like this.
  21. FrgMstr

    FrgMstr Just Plain Mean Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,331
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    Hmm, I did fix that. It is pulling from a cached version. Lots of security changes lately and this has to do with those. Thanks for pointing this out.
     
  22. ManofGod

    ManofGod [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,681
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007

    Fury X and Fury Nano, yes. The 7970 and the 7950 were priced just as they should have been though. I have a feeling their prices will be exactly were we are willing to pay but, we will see. :)
     
    N4CR likes this.
  23. MavericK

    MavericK Zero Cool

    Messages:
    28,774
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    I'm all for hopping back over to AMD CPUs if the performance is there. Intel's latest offerings don't really seem to be much progress over previous generations. Hell, you can still get by with a 1st or 2nd gen i7 for a lot of uses.

    I also find it weird that my current processor (4790K) is still essentially the same price as a 6700K.
     
  24. FrgMstr

    FrgMstr Just Plain Mean Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,331
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    Well, what all new tech are these new motherboards going to support and how well are those going to work. Big part of the picture....
     
    Ieldra, razor1 and MavericK like this.
  25. muxr

    muxr Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    151
    Joined:
    May 27, 2016
    You really can't complain about Fiji prices either. It is not like AMD was acting greedy. It was a test run for HBM more than anything and implementing HBM was not cheap. I would be surprised if they made any money on it. They probably lost money, considering how Fury series barely even registers on Steam hardware survey.

    Ryzen doesn't have this problem. They are also already selling product on the 14nm, so the yields are probably decent at least. I fully expect we'll see a competitive price.
     
  26. Kor

    Kor 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,176
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    That's an understatement...
     
  27. Ultima99

    Ultima99 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,891
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Potentially matching Broadwell-E is a good start. By time this thing launches it will be going up against Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X so lets hope it can bring the clockspeeds to match those.
     
  28. KingGlade

    KingGlade [H]Lite

    Messages:
    105
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2016
    I am very excited about these new AMD CPU's and if performance can even come close to broadwell-e at a decent price I'll purchase it just support AMD. Intel needs some competition.
     
  29. thesmokingman

    thesmokingman [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,834
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    It's clear they delegate way too much, so much so that the details get lost. They need to hire some continuity people aka script supervisors from Hollywood to maintain at least some appearance of singularity of thought and logistics. Script or continuity supervisors maintain the flow of continuity from scene to scene with regards to props, wardrobe, anything and everything. For ex. if ya link a 100 sample file, you should note it so that ppl are not left scratching their heads, going wtf? All these stupid mistakes only provide fuel for the haters.
     
  30. Doward

    Doward [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,541
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    One reason I'm considering Zen vs Skylake-E, is ability to upgrade the CPU across generations, without buying an entire new motherboard. I'd be happy with Broadwell-E levels of performance.
     
    Morphy and noko like this.
  31. noko

    noko [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,290
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Much agree, great having options without having to update the whole system, OS etc. Now I wonder if the dual channel DDR 4 will ever really become a limitation for the Platform over time and what advantage does Intel quad channel memory has if any.
     
  32. hurleybird

    hurleybird [H]Lite

    Messages:
    106
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2012
    There are probably some really obscure edge cases where the quad channel memory controller makes a tangible difference, although DDR 4 will continue to get faster for awhile. That said, and I'm by no means predicting AMD will do this, but they could always put a stack of HBM on the package as a last level cache if they wanted to maintain platform capability without increasing the number of memory channels in the event they became limited by memory bandwidth in the future.
     
  33. noko

    noko [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,290
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    I wonder if the X370 motherboards will be able to support a type of Interposer for the CPU and HBM memory if that ever becomes available. APU's in particular with the platform.
     
  34. tangoseal

    tangoseal [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,419
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Getting excited at Zen. Hope it pans out well in your [H] official review. We will know in a few weeks once they hit the shelves.
     
  35. ole-m

    ole-m Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    443
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2015
    It's for sure faster than my 10 core:
    E5-2680 V2 10 core 2.8ghz/ 3.6ghz turbo
    40 seconds
     
  36. Evildead666

    Evildead666 n00b

    Messages:
    48
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2011
    @Kyle :
    I'm just wondering if the 25MB of L3 Cache of the 6950X is causing any discrepancies.
    The 6900K only has 20MB of L3 cache.

    Disabling two cores is fun, but you can't disable the extra 5MB of L3 cache ?
     
    Singularity_Survivor likes this.
  37. aztekk

    aztekk Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2014
    You can't but I'm guessing it's probably not gonna make a huge difference since this is not a memory intensive benchmark. Usually rendering tasks do perform better with more cache however, so it would still be helpful if someone with a real i7-6900k could reproduce this result, if only to convince the last remaining skeptics around.
     
  38. Evildead666

    Evildead666 n00b

    Messages:
    48
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2011
    Yup, there's nothing better than a real comparison.

    The only way to do a correct reproduction of the results, is to use the same hardware+timings in all the tests, where possible.
    Using a CPU with 25% extra L3 Cache, invalidates the results of the i7 for me.

    As we see, Kyle is almost spot-on with the Zen chip, when the parameters are correct.
     
    Singularity_Survivor likes this.
  39. JustReason

    JustReason razor1 is my Lover

    Messages:
    2,485
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2015
    My good sir, you deserve an award for that. Laughed my rear-end off.
     
    pendragon1 likes this.
  40. Pieter3dnow

    Pieter3dnow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,790
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Not to surprised about any of it really ;)