Did you need to provide your order number? They act like they can't do anything with my product keys without an order number.
Yes, I did need to provide my order number.
You should have received an email with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you need to provide your order number? They act like they can't do anything with my product keys without an order number.
Weird, the number in my post is Nvidia's number (I didn't call steam)
That number you gave is Digital River. It's not NVidia or Steam.
[AK]Zip;1036805437 said:The game is removed from my library, but the game was fully installed and I can still play it.
C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\metro 2033\metro2033.exe
[AK]Zip;1036805457 said:I don't know what to tell you. My game works just fine. I have ever tried to restart steam, but Metro 2033 still works.
Guys this is pointless Steam Deactivated all the Steam keys
Yeah...Nvidia reactivated the keys I got, but Steam is saying they're duplicates now.
How did Nvidia reactivate them? What do you mean by this?
See previous posts about contacting them and re-activating them.
I can't believe there are some that are outraged over not getting a game for free due to an obvious error. No one is going to hold them to this. It's like picking up money dropped by a Brinks truck and then being pissed when you have to give it back. Some can complain about the TOS all they want, but what is the outcome? No one is going to hire an attorney over this. Nvidia knows that. Everyone that got a cd key knew it was because of a bug, but did it to see if they'd make you "give it back", aka cancel it.
Man, the shit some of you will do to save $10.
I'm too lazy to read their TOS, yet I'm sure they have absolutely 100% nothing to worry about. Do people realize how unthreatening it sounds to them if you call and complain? Anyone who had the key restored is likely the benefactor of a customer service rep who is a pushover.
What is the negative outcome for Nvidia if they don't honor this? Nothing.
Potential negative press. I don't anticipate any lawsuits being filed over this, class action or otherwise. Potential FTC complaints, I imagine?What is the negative outcome for Nvidia if they don't honor this? Nothing.
Are you kidding me? Are you trollin', or do you really have no idea how law works?
Potential negative press. I don't anticipate any lawsuits being filed over this, class action or otherwise. Potential FTC complaints, I imagine?
In any case, no one has actually been wronged as near as I can tell, so I see no pressing need to drag NVIDIA through any mud. I suggest we all forget about it and move on.
Do you really think Digital River it allowed to take away a product that they gave to us after the fact? Especially when their TOS specifically states they cannot do this in section 1.2. This is akin to Best Buy selling you something and then forcing you to return it.How is what I'm saying trolling?
Please explain to me in what context someone would actually have such little shame that they'd approach an attorney with this. The filing fee alone is 35x what the game costs at retail.
All I'm saying is it was an OBVIOUS error that probably 100% of the people who took advantage of it were aware of.
Of course negative press, that is obvious. I wasn't saying that, but what consumer is going to call an attorney and try to throw around the idea of a class action based on what happened. There is obviously a class of people, but with what damage? How did this negatively impact anyone. There's no damages, at all. The game was free. No one spent $10 and then were charged another $20 because there was a pricing error. THEN people would have a definite issue.
The game was free, lmao.
Do you really think Digital River it allowed to take away a product that they gave to us after the fact? Especially when their TOS specifically states they cannot do this in section 1.2. This is akin to Best Buy selling you something and then forcing you to return it.
No, it really isn't the same thing at all, because if Best Buy "sold" you something...you paid for it.
No, it really isn't the same thing at all, because if Best Buy "sold" you something...you paid for it.
If no payment is provided, no purchase was made.
personal data is worth something.
I agree, but the exchange of personal information would not constitute as payment for goods delivered in this case. The personal information was simply required for order processing (or at least necessary for the cart system).personal data is worth something.
No, it really isn't the same thing at all, because if Best Buy "sold" you something...you paid for it.
If no payment is provided, no purchase was made.
My mailman sees as much personal data listed on the faces of envelopes as Nvidia did when I submitted it, but I don't really think I have a good case against my mailman if he accidentally gives me a check intended for someone else, and then asks for it back when he realizes that it was an error.
Yes that example is ridiculous, but so is someone implying that Nvidia "broke the law."
So if I bought those sticky notes at staples, even if I got a receipt I did not make a purchase? I got a receipt from digital river.