notarat
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2,501
New Nvidia GPU's are getting announced 2nd weekend in Feb with full availability soon after.
I'm hearing June.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Nvidia GPU's are getting announced 2nd weekend in Feb with full availability soon after.
I'm hearing June.
More Chinese rumors for the fire.
so higher core clock but lower shader clock, I Wonder how it will change things
That GK104 looks interesting, but1.5GB vram is disappointing. Even if there are 3GB versions, they'll be higher than $399.
Yeah, but it's the mid-range (560 Ti) kind of part, so the real high-end could easily have 3GB.
mid-range is not $399
I don't understood, nvidia doesn't presented new cards at ces.
this means that we will not see any GK104 soon, am I wrong?
When high-end is $550 it is.
No, it is not.
No official specs for midrange but it used to be $100~200 cards. Not sure who upped it first but I recall Nvidia coming out with GTX 460 at two price points $199 and $229. I don't remember if ATI did anything similar.
When high-end is $550 it is.
mid-range is not $399
And a cup of coffee used to be 25 cents.
If NVidia has an entire line of card above the GK104, then by definition the GK104 isn't high-end. Just like the 7850/7870 will be mid-range cards, even if they outperform 6970s and cost $300. It's product positioning, not absolute price.
I'll allow that you can call them mid-high end, if you want call something like the 6770 mid-range, but that's hardly the [H] target market.
Yeah, but how long ago was that the average?
What I'm talking about happened in the middle of 2010.
Well I'm not even sure if any of this stuff is true. But if so, why couldn't there be two lines both considered high-end? Just like with mid-range there is no official definition of high-end. And yeah, there will be multiple ways to consider it and even more important than positioning and price is sales volume. I know that Nvidia and AMD would not consider $400 cards to be high volume (in comparison to the rest of the products). The popular cards in this category are probably in the $125~150 range. Nvidia pushed the boundaries taking it up to $229.
and I'll allow you to keep posting here but I'm keeping an eye on you.
BTW, I just measured the percent improvement for the GTX 780 vs GTX 580 in the new chart and compared it with this old chart:
Here's a summary of my calculations:
Code:Chart Model Percent Difference New GTX 580 100.00% New GTX 780 230.16% Old GTX 580 100.00% Old GTX 780 231.06%
Regardless of whether or not the charts are indeed authentic, I think that it's safe to say that they were made by the same entity.
sincerely I don't know where people got that graph but history teaches.
have you ever seen a cards with a single chip with a 230% performance improvements on previous top tier?
no I have never seen it.
sincerely I don't know where people got that graph but history teaches.
have you ever seen a cards with a single chip with a 230% performance improvements on previous top tier?
no I have never seen it.
8800 GTX almost did it
8800GTX never gone over 180% improvements while comparing to a 7900GTX and not so often.
8800GTX never gone over 180% improvements while comparing to a 7900GTX and not so often.
That kind of improvement over a one generation span is pretty fucking impressive. If results happened like that every time a new GPU was released, we'd already be playing games on a holodeck, not some shitty and antiquated CRT/LCD monitors.
um you have an A64 6400 X2 with a gtx570? that cpu is already a MASSIVE limitation for you current gtx570.I hear you there. I might just be ditching my GTX 570 for this newer model. Would be the first time in quite a while that I haven't skipped a generation when upgrading my GPU.
so higher core clock but lower shader clock, I Wonder how it will change things
um you have an A64 6400 X2 with a gtx570? that cpu is already a MASSIVE limitation for you current gtx570.
Depends at what overclock and resolution IMO.This is true.
Now the point is, is a sandy bridge (i5 2500K or i7 2600K) enough for a GTX770 SLI?
http://www.pcper.com/news/Graphics-Cards/Nvidia-May-Launch-GK104-Kepler-GPUs-Ahead-Schedule
Another vote for February.
charlie is saying that the kepler will be faster then gcn....
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/01/19/nvidia-kepler-vs-amd-gcn-has-a-clear-winner/
Not with a 256 bit memory bus it's not...that would have to be OC'd to cherry red hot.
amd got away with 256 bit memory since 9700pro
i dont think every model will be using 256 bit anyway, high end model is for sure to use 384 bit, or maybe even 512 bit.