skudmunky said:What are you planning to do with it? Massive overclocks? Stock speeds? Do you care about how loud it is? How much do you want to spend?
well, my specs are in my sig... I'd like quieter this this damn Thermaltake...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
skudmunky said:What are you planning to do with it? Massive overclocks? Stock speeds? Do you care about how loud it is? How much do you want to spend?
KINgGh0sT said:well, my specs are in my sig... I'd like quieter this this damn Thermaltake...
CletisMckloskey47 said:count me in.
i got an amd xp 3000+ 400mhz fsb on an asus a7n8x.
looking at getting an a64 system in the next year or so.
Light1984 said:you want one eh? how much would you be willing to pay for a 3200+ w/ Asus A7N8X Deluxe v 2.0, and i got ram and stuff too that might be up for sale
velusip said:I know better not to buy a second hand processor from a guy who browses hardforum.
i really dont think so. look at intel's recent history, the only socket that was shortlived was socket 423, Slot1 supported p2's AND p3's, 370 lasted from the PPGA celeron to 1.4ghz p3's (although you needed a new chipset for the tualatins), and s478 lasted from ~2001 to 2005. On AMD's side, Slot A was shortlived and Socket 462 lasted from the thunderbird athlons in '99 to 2005 when AMD phased out socket A semprons. the A64 revisions are due to the socket needing a change when the memory needs a change, a64 NEEDED a socket different than 754 for dual channel, and im willing to bet that when s754 was released the memory controller was very premature and couldnt handle dual channel (or even 1ghz HTT), hense the reason for the 1MB L2 on the original claw a64's.Javvis said:Sometimes it seems AMD & Intel make changes .....to fuel new sales for themselves and Mobo manufacturers. There's alot of PC'ers that have to have the newest of whatever.
erm... the FX-57 is a full Ghz faster than a 2500m. the 2500 was NEVER a high end chip, youre comparing apples to oranges here. there are a64 mobiles too, and they are cheap. you'll never hit FX-57 speeds with a mobile xp(well, you can, but its VERY rare), much less what an 57 can it (3.2+ GHz)AMD's FX-57 cost about $1100 -1200 ....and is the Flagship of AMD's processors ....but, for that price ....I can buy & perfer to own about 14 AMD XP 2500 Mobiles & OC them.
i find it's the integrated memory controllerlithium726 said:i think hypertransport makes a64 MORE than worth the upgrade cost IMO, the whole platform is SO much more responsive than aXP ever was.
you know what i meant. im tierd(cf)Eclipse said:i find it's the integrated memory controller
understandable. i'll let it slide cause i've seen how much you really do knowlithium726 said:im tierd
velusip said:Argh! Where did you buy your 400MHz FSB Athlon XP? I want one.