Commander FAT
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2000
- Messages
- 3,565
Wow, take everything so personally why don't you.![]()
Well you did quote me and said you were trying to stop me from wasting my money. So I was just responding.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, take everything so personally why don't you.![]()
Help in not wasting $60?
Well, not my problem or business anyway.
Some people label themselves hardcore gamers because they install Call of Duty, meanwhile, I've grown a beard just playing Demon's Souls and reaching a Soul Level of 45.
And yet there you are playing a console game and trying to convince yourself that it's the pinnacle of PC gaming. Well I've got news for you: the PS3 this game was developed for has a fraction of the computing power that your PC does. Imagine just how epic this game could have been if they'd poured all their resources into fully exploiting the PC as a platform, rather than catering to the lowest common denominator hardware that is a modern console. The memory limitations alone must have seriously impacted their design decisions.Remember when PC gaming used to check those off the list regularly because they were in the game, and PC games were innovative? Well, I hope you remember, cause all we're gonna be left with are memories of how PC gaming was king if this trend of consolization on PC continues.[/url]
Better than Battlefield 3 and MW3?
Your comparing apples and oranges.
As an overall experience, yes.
As an overall experience that YOU are looking for.
It's an experience that no real hardcore gamer should be without.
unless that "real hardcore gamer" doesn't like RPGs... let alone JRPGs... lol
whatever, it's a good game, quit making multiple threads about it
All four of the games you listed are emasculated console ports. I don't see how you're helping your case here.Funny, you talk about Dark Souls like a stripped down experience in spite of knowing nothing about it, let alone how open world it is, how hard and challenging it is.
It's better than Deus Ex: Human Revolution, period.
It's better than Battlefield 3 and MW3, for sure. It'll likely be better than Skyrim.
All four of the games you listed are emasculated console ports. I don't see how you're helping your case here.
It can never be better than what it would have been if it were a PC exclusive.
And yet you bought Dark Souls instead of holding out for a superior PC version. Just shows how easily pleased you are, no different from anyone who bought any of those four games you listed.If any of those games were a PC exclusive, then threads like this wouldn't be necessary because I wouldn't be ranting about how consolized the supposed AAA "PC games" are.
You can put "PC games" in parentheses, because they are really nothing more than glorified console ports with a few bones tossed to PC gamers, if any.
If Dark Souls were a PC exclusive, I'd be reading a thread bitching about how fucking hard the game is and how people quit playing it because they couldn't stomach personal failure.
And yet you bought Dark Souls instead of holding out for a superior PC version. Just shows how easily pleased you are, no different from anyone who bought any of those four games you listed.
And who's fault is that? Yours, and all the shortsighted Japanese people who buy it when they could be playing something much better. They're not voting with their wallets to support superior games, just inferior ones.That would be incorrect, I've already said this over and over I'm starting to sound like a broken record.
There is no PC version of this game because Japanese developers who made this game do not make PC games, and the reason they don't make PC games is because Japanese gamers do not like to play games on the PC.
Did you miss the part where I called MW3 and BF3 both emasculated console ports?I'm very hard to please, whereas you're happy buying a rehashed Call of Duty 4 without all the features and you buy the map packs, I abhor them and condemn them on here.
It's good that you support them, but when a single dollar of your hard-earned cash goes to a console developer, you're supporting the death of PC gaming and crappy games.While you have no problem giving Kotick enough money for a gold plated fish tank, I'm busy supporting indie developers on PC who make better games and don't try to rape your wallet.
Another game I won't be buying. What's your point?While you'll be playing Diablo 3 with all it's stripped out features and dumbed down gameplay to suit the lowest common denominator, I'll be busy bringing my computer over to a friends house for some good old fashioned LAN play on Torchlight 2.
Just don't buy any console ports! Steam is full of those.While you may be willing to install the Origin malware, I'll be busy scouring the Steam sales for any titles I wanted but may have missed out on.
And I won't be buying either game, because I only buy titles which push the boundaries of what the PC is capable of as a platform.While you might be playing a dumbed down consolized Skyrim, I'll be busy exploring the vast world of Dark Souls and it's unforgiving environments. I bet Skyrim will be easily beaten in 10 hours just like Oblivion was. Paid reviewers for Dark Souls still haven't even made it halfway through Dark Souls after 80 hours.
It's still not as good as it would be if it were released on the best possible platform, the PC. I'm starting to sound like a broken record here because you can't seem to grasp the concept that just because it's got one or two features that set it apart from all the other crap console games out there, it's still just a console game.<blah blah blah reasons why Dark Souls is 1% better than all the other console trash games out there>
And who's fault is that? Yours, and all the shortsighted Japanese people who buy it when they could be playing something much better. They're not voting with their wallets to support superior games, just inferior ones
Again, if there were a way I could stop all these people from buying these inferior games, I would. They're too stupid to have the right to choose the games they want to play. Things will only get better when people start making intelligent decisions with their money. It's not going to happen while people keep supporting the limited games that are currently available.
Did you miss the part where I called MW3 and BF3 both emasculated console ports?
It's good that you support them, but when a single dollar of your hard-earned cash goes to a console developer, you're supporting the death of PC gaming and crappy games.
Another game I won't be buying. What's your point?
Just don't buy any console ports! Steam is full of those.
And I won't be buying either game, because I only buy titles which push the boundaries of what the PC is capable of as a platform.
t's still not as good as it would be if it were released on the best possible platform, the PC. I'm starting to sound like a broken record here because you can't seem to grasp the concept that just because it's got one or two features that set it apart from all the other crap console games out there, it's still just a console game.
Until you stop supporting mediocre games, you'll never get that version of Dark Souls that works with Eyefinity that you were dreaming about.
While you might be playing a dumbed down consolized Skyrim, I'll be busy exploring the vast world of Dark Souls and it's unforgiving environments. I bet Skyrim will be easily beaten in 10 hours just like Oblivion was. Paid reviewers for Dark Souls still haven't even made it halfway through Dark Souls after 80 hours. This is even with them sharing information in an email group called "The Chain of Pain."
And no, I'm actually part of the solution. I support games that offer the best possible gaming experience. Not only that, I'm part of the solution because by voting with my wallet, I'm saying that as a gamer, I want more challenging games that are hard and unforgiving, Contra-like in terms of difficulty. By pre-ordering it, I'm sending a message not just to FROM Software that made this game, but to the industry as a whole that this is the kind of game I want made. I don't want that Hello Kitty Adventure Island shit that everyone else seems to like, nor do I want a lowest common denominator experience that is so rampant today.
Dark Souls has ZERO DLC.
Dark Souls has a Collectors Edition you can buy for the same price as the base game, $59.99, meanwhile, Skyrim has a ridiculous "Sucker Ass Collector's Edition" for $150 where you get a statue and an art book. Big fuckin whoop.
Dark Souls is insanely hard, whereas most games can be easily beaten in 5 or 6 hours, and you get trophies/achievements for just viewing the first cutscene or reaching the first save point. Dark Souls has no mercy for the weak, it weeds out the weak.
If you want "insert mediocre easymode game here", there's plenty out there that fit that description that you would probably enjoy.
I'm voting with my wallet that I want challenging games instead of the easymode titles that are all too common these days. If everybody voted this way, gaming as a whole would benefit, and there would be a revival of games that actually punished you for poor play and rewarded you immensely by giving you a sense of satisfaction and accomplishment when you overcome a difficult challenge.
The Penetrator? Did he register in his neighborhood?
You could list 100 reasons why Dark Souls is better than all the other shit console games and console ports out there. Still doesn't mean it's not a shit console game.Feel free to address the rest of my post, if you can![]()
You could list 100 reasons why Dark Souls is better than all the other shit console games and console ports out there. Still doesn't mean it's not a shit console game.
That's because all the AAA PC titles in recent memory have been console port crap too.It's better than any triple A PC title in recent memory, and that's a fact, son.
If I denounced all games with those shortcomings, I will be forced to play Dreamcast and Quake Live.
We agree but how would I enjoy my hobby?
Casual gamers like you shouldn't be allowed to buy games and ruin it for everyone else.I think that pretty much says it all. It's a hobby. I don't take it seriously enough to care to protest. I want to play some fun games (Deus Ex was a blast, so was Gears of War 3, and I'll be buying Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3). If I think something's too expensive, I won't buy it or I'll wait for it to go down in price.
I'm all for protecting consumers rights, don't get me wrong. But, come on, games out these days are freaking amazing. Say what you will about consoles, but they are putting out A+ titles, and they are getting games that were otherwise in the realm of PC gamers only, into the hands of millions of people who would never play them otherwise.
Complaining about dedicated servers, "dumbing down" games, etc... it's a waste of my time. I've grown up, I have a job, a fiance, and I just want to spend a few hours enjoying games I couldn't even imagine when I was my brothers age.
That's because all the AAA PC titles in recent memory have been console port crap too.
Casual gamers like you shouldn't be allowed to buy games and ruin it for everyone else.
See when I think of casual games I think of Plants Vs Zombies and Bejeweled. Call me crazy.
I can agree with that definition to an extent.
I have no idea what the other guy is referring to, but I view most people who play games like Call of Derpy as casual gamers rather than "hardcore" gamers.
I tend to think of "hardcore" as challenging, instead of a dumbed down gaming experience that caters to the lowest common denominator, aka, that's the definition of casual. Casual gamers do not want a challenge, casual gamers do not want frustration, casual gamers want easy mode, they want victories just handed to them without earning it, they just want a simplified experience that they don't have to put much thought into.
The consolization of games being ported over to PC has made this more and more prevalent as of late.
I despise the term "hardcore gamer" it is almost unanimously used by elitists who are as much of a danger to the industry as the so-called "casual gamers".
I don't think of it as elitist as much as I think of it as having a firm basis in reality, and even if you don't like it, will you DENY that what I'm saying is true?
I do realize however, that the definition of "hardcore" probably varies from person to person.
So what do you call the people who enjoy both the CoD franchise and Demon's Souls? The more you post the more ridiculous you end up sounding.I can agree with that definition to an extent.
I have no idea what the other guy is referring to, but I view most people who play games like Call of Derpy as casual gamers rather than "hardcore" gamers.
I tend to think of "hardcore" as challenging, instead of a dumbed down gaming experience that caters to the lowest common denominator, aka, that's the definition of casual. Casual gamers do not want a challenge, casual gamers do not want frustration, casual gamers want easy mode, they want victories just handed to them without earning it, they just want a simplified experience that they don't have to put much thought into.
The consolization of games being ported over to PC has made this more and more prevalent as of late.
Used to be that when people thought of PC gaming, they didn't just note that the gaming experience had superior visuals and whatnot because of the lack of hardware limitations compared to consoles, but they took note of how PC games could be more expansive and challenging, and often longer because of that.
That just isn't the case anymore, instead, we get "cater to the casuals" 5-6 hour PC games loaded with DLC and map packs for what passes as a "triple A" PC title these days.