Epic Games Store

Discussion in 'PC Gaming & Hardware' started by Blade-Runner, Dec 5, 2018.

  1. Sycraft

    Sycraft [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,472
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Except that right now Epic's offering is very half-assed. I have no issue with more stores. On the contrary, I'm a GOG head and buy my games there preferentially, only going to Steam if I can't get them there. However what I want in competition to Steam is something that is better. A better interface, better (or at least as good) features, a well curated collection, etc. Right now, the Epic Store has none of that. All they have is bribing developers to not release their game on other stores... which of course means less competition.

    It's not a case of "two options that are very similar, just minor differences that one person might prefer over another," it is a case of Epic having a very half baked product and trying to push it by throwing money at devs.
     
  2. Kardonxt

    Kardonxt 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,000
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    I agree with your post, other than you don't seem know Coke is infinitely superior to the pig swill known as Pepsi lol.
     
  3. Gabe3

    Gabe3 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,064
    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    when coke comes out with a version made with real sugar I'll buy it. until then I buy pepsi made with real sugar version cause I'm not putting that corn syrup crap in me.
     
  4. sharknice

    sharknice [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,814
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    So you think EGS should be forced to wait 10 years to be competitive with Steam?
     
    GoldenTiger likes this.
  5. Viper87227

    Viper87227 [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,334
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    I'd like to hope that more money going to developers will equate to better games. Maybe I'm being naive and they're going to squirrel away the extra cash and we'll see no benefit, but I'd like to think that won't happen (at least not everywhere). Could a greater profit share lead to better post-release support? More timely patches? Better DLC? Could it be used to take bigger risks on new projects? Will it make PC a more enticing platform for major publishers, bringing better quality ports? Or ports of games that may have otherwise been exclusive to the more profitable consoles?

    For me personally, what it boils down to is that I'm done giving a shit about what launchers are on my PC. 8 years ago, I was a little miffed when BF3 never showed up on Steam, but that feels like a lifetime ago now. Anymore, it just doesn't matter to me. I'll buy the games I want wherever I'm required to, with no complaints. It's not worth getting mad about. And if in the process, anything at all positive can come out of developers getting more of my money, all the better. Even if it doesn't get reinvested into games, I guess I'm happy knowing that the folks who have given me my primary means of entertainment over the past 20 years get a little bonus. I just don't care anymore about launchers, and nobody is going to convince me that publishers and developers getting paid better is a bad thing.

    I get what you're saying here, but I don't think you can compare the growth of Steam to the growth of EGS. We're talking about a decades difference here. Steam grew the way that it did because it really was the only option. They were the first platform to bring digital distribution to the masses, and the more they grew the more people wanted to be on their platform. It all happened very organically.

    I truly believe that luxury doesn't exist in 2019. You can't just come out with a new launcher and have people organically switch. Steam is too big. Major publishers have done the same thing Epic is doing now, they've simply kept it in house. EA was the first company to figure out that if people want their games bad enough, they will (begrudgingly) install their platform and eventually they will get over it. Now every major publisher has their own launcher. Epic came along and is offering publishers who aren't big enough to challenge Steam on their own the same opportunity. The bottom line is that despite the fact that Steam is great for us consumers, it's obviously losing it's appeal to the people who make our games. If it wasn't, we wouldn't see the intense fragmentation we are today.

    I won't disagree for a second that EGS has some growing to do, and that it lacks a lot of the features that makes Steam the better platform. But I'm willing to give EGS time to grow, just like I did with Steam. I think in time it could become the superior platform, but it obviously needs support from both content creators and consumes to make that happen.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2019
  6. dark_reign

    dark_reign 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,263
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Eshelmen likes this.
  7. DF-1

    DF-1 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,577
    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    there will be riot in the streets.
     
  8. Krenum

    Krenum [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,643
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
  9. Denpepe

    Denpepe [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,223
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2015
    AceGoober, Armenius and Q-BZ like this.
  10. Blade-Runner

    Blade-Runner 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,112
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2013
    GTA V sold over 10 million copies on steam, Take2 would be crazy to make it an EGS exclusive.
     
    AceGoober and Armenius like this.
  11. Viper87227

    Viper87227 [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    17,334
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Perhaps they think that RDR2 is a game people want bad enough to buy it no matter where they sell it? No doubt, people would lose their fucking minds over it.... but would they actually boycott it? Makes me think of that picture of the boycott MW2 group where almost every member is playing MW2. People seem to be real grumpy about this EGS thing... but when it comes to major exclusives (especially if they aren't timed), who's going to fold first?
     
    GoldenTiger and Flogger23m like this.
  12. Flogger23m

    Flogger23m [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,124
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Coke is better than Pepsi but I still drink both even though I shouldn't. :p

    At this time there is no doubt that Steam is better than Epic. Seems like in 5-6 months though all of the major useful features will be on Epic's platform.

    Also this. RDR2. A tiny percent, probably less than 1%, would skip this game over it not being on Steam.
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2019
  13. Denpepe

    Denpepe [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,223
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2015
    I tought Rockstar also had their own launcher, I got GTAV via GMG or similar and that did not activate on steam but the whatsitcalled social club something or other.
     
  14. Gabe3

    Gabe3 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,064
    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    I guess epic paid big bucks to make it exclusive.
     
  15. Eshelmen

    Eshelmen [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,327
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    At what point does a digital platform become a monopoly? I think this is the early fear of EGS, they have a ton of money and they're willing to spend it on becoming the biggest digital platform store out there.
     
    AceGoober and dragon69 like this.
  16. Denpepe

    Denpepe [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,223
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2015
    Well steam kind of had the monopoly, but a lot of publishers have made their own launcher/shop imo not to try and compete with steam but to get a bigger share of the money and maybe better control over their software and even playerbase and cheaters etc..

    Thing is these others mostly stick to their own stuff, battle.net only recently added a couple of activision games and those are online based.

    EGS on the other hand want to make for some competition, but for us consumers there is little in the way of competition, it's more of a bidding war to get the popular games on their new shop to attrack an audience that goes further then just the fortnite crowd.

    Now Epic should have had to common sense to
    1. make sure their software was at least as functional as some of the bigger players out there iso some barebones alpha like excuse of a launcher
    2. should have offered some good games at a better price then the competition to compete with those iso the exclusivity crap they do now.
    3. offer something exclusive to their platform the competition does not have (not a game but some functionality or whatever) that entices people to have (another) reason to join them.
    I think Epic might be a little late to the party as the bigger players have already made their version, but who knows maybe with the smaller publishers/studios and an incentive to the players they might grab a decent chunk of the market. I would advise them though to stop the exclusivity bs.
     
  17. Bigbacon

    Bigbacon [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,899
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    What amazes me is steam/valve have not responded in any way. The could have killed Epic off already but just lowering their percentage or something. 80/20, better percentages after X amount of sales, some kind if tiered thing.

    Instead they just sit.

    Or the exclusivss, just put it on egs for 49.99 and on steam for 69.99. Let us choose with our miney what platform we want the game on.
     
    AceGoober and tunatime like this.
  18. tunatime

    tunatime 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,035
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Um no games shouldnt be costing $70. Also its not the lower rate that is putting games on egs my bet is epic is paying devs millions to move to epic. The question is if in the long run if this hurts them or not.

    I myself would have no problem with egs if they just put them on both stores for the same price or steam 60 and egs 50 let the market chosec where to buy.
     
    MavericK likes this.
  19. Gabe3

    Gabe3 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,064
    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    steam probably did. its just that they dont have the kind of money epic has.
     
  20. Bigbacon

    Bigbacon [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,899
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    pretty sure Valve has TONS of money.

    prices were just examples but they could do whatever they wanted.70 dollars isn't unheard of anyway when you start having games be 59.99 already or toss in all the 'upgraded' editions people are still buying.
     
  21. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,660
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    AceGoober and Armenius like this.
  22. Blade-Runner

    Blade-Runner 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,112
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2013
    Precisely, exclusive deals like what has been brokered with Ubisoft has demonstrably reduced the number of storefronts from which you can buy digital games. With The Division not only could you buy it from Uplay, Steam and Origin, official digital keys were available from numerous third party sellers. Now with The Division 2 you literally only have two options, with there being no competition in price whatsoever.
     
    Armenius likes this.
  23. Armenius

    Armenius I Drive Myself to the [H]ospital

    Messages:
    19,096
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2014
    Steam changed their percentage to a tier-based system on sales months before EGS launched. Valve isn't doing anything more because they know what Epic is doing isn't sustainable.
     
    memnoch998 and TheToE! like this.
  24. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,660
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    I'm pretty sure it's illegal as well in many countries (operating at a loss for the sole purpose of hurting the competition)
     
  25. Kinsaras

    Kinsaras 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,574
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Richard Geldreich was working at Valve from 2009 to 2014. On Twitter he wrote a lot of stuff. I'll post a few things he said.

    https://twitter.com/richgel999

     
    AceGoober, GoldenTiger and sharknice like this.
  26. JustinCorrigible

    JustinCorrigible Gawd

    Messages:
    780
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Last name is suspicious.

    I'm not totally against Epic Store, as I'm not one to complain about free games, and that gravy train won't last forever.
     
    Kinsaras likes this.
  27. Comixbooks

    Comixbooks Ignore Me

    Messages:
    13,900
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Red Dead Redemption 2 is rumored going to be on Epic floating around if you search for it you might as well put every game on Epic.
    Never was a fan of the social club that came with my Max Payne 3.
     
  28. JustinCorrigible

    JustinCorrigible Gawd

    Messages:
    780
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Social Club always felt like GFWL, to me.
     
  29. TheToE!

    TheToE! [H] Brewmaster

    Messages:
    6,743
    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    For me the important features are :
    1.Refunds because most PC games are ports and devs are always doing something stupid.
    2. Review system.
    3. Forums.

    I've not installed EGS because i've had no need to. Not sure if it's got those features yet.
     
  30. delita

    delita [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,460
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2014
    I'm not totally against the Epic Store either - just in it's current state. I think it's nice that the developers are getting a better cut, but as it stands, we the players, are getting a shit deal because we have to deal with their crappy store in it's infancy with a huge lack of features that Steam provides. It's not like Epic doesn't have the resources to make their storefront rival Steams. When it does, I'll consider buying a game there. Until then, they can fuck off.
     
  31. Kinsaras

    Kinsaras 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,574
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
  32. sharknice

    sharknice [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,814
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    GoldenTiger and Kinsaras like this.
  33. Aix.

    Aix. [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,768
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    I'm inclined to agree with him based on the company's inability to follow through on pretty much anything:

    - they've all but stopped making games, and the one game they did make was a fucking digital card game that was so heavily monetized that it's averaging 300 concurrent players after just a few months. I guess it shouldn't be surprising considering the amount of lootboxes that are present in their signature games like CS:GO and TF2, along with the associated Steam Marketplace selling fees, etc.
    - their own "new" engine Source 2 has a whopping two games on it: Dota2 and Artifact.
    - their foray into hardware with Steam Machines fizzled and they've now discontinued the Steam Link.

    By all accounts their "do what you feel like" corporate structure isn't exactly driving results, but I guess when you've got unlimited money rolling in from Steam and you aren't publicly traded there doesn't have to be any urgency. The way EPIC has treated Fortnite BR, OTOH, has been with non-stop development, community interaction, and attempts to push the boundaries - and I gotta say it's been pretty refreshing after everything I described from Valve above. I get that this will impact the cheap key sellers and all that, but people claiming that EPIC is ruining the industry and that the devs are stabbing gamers in the back seem to be unwilling to look at the big picture.
     
    SoFGR, GoldenTiger and sharknice like this.
  34. jiminator

    jiminator Capt Obvious

    Messages:
    11,248
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    What is epic doing that is unsustainable? That is just nonsense. essentially they have a storefront and a download service and they get a 12% cut of the profit.
    People complain about steam and the ludicrous money printing machine that their store had become. Welp, the jig is up.
    12% of something for doing virtually nothing is pretty good money. 30% of nothing that steam is getting for new big releases.... well, gaben may need to rethink his business model.
    If I was epic I would buy up every single game possible. It is just easy money.
     
    GoldenTiger likes this.
  35. ThatITGuy

    ThatITGuy Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    243
    Joined:
    May 5, 2017
    Just give me the ability to download and install the game without your stupid launchers. Not a fan of Epic limiting release to only one "sales platform". Why not do like with retailers, where each has their own preorder bonus. Buy from Valve, no bonus. Buy from Epic store you get in game items and skins.
     
  36. Denpepe

    Denpepe [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,223
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2015
    Strangely enough I got the metro exodus physical version (CE) from a local online store so there are exeptions possible it seems. My order did get delayed for almost 2 weeks though, the transparent cover had an EGS sticker over the steam print and inside the game box was a wee manual with the EGS code (which I assume the steam one was swapped out for this one, hence the delay).

    but since it seems that physical releases are going the way of the dodo this might be one of the few ones where this happens.
     
  37. daphatgrant

    daphatgrant Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    18,034
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Maybe I'm old but I just want to use Steam. I broke down and finally got a Origins account. Chances are pretty high I'll get an Epic account. I just get leary of dumping money into a new service/marketplace/whatever you want to call it. Hopefully if one were to struggle they'd just get absorbed by another and you wouldn't lose your paid for content.
     
    Flogger23m and dragon69 like this.
  38. ThatITGuy

    ThatITGuy Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    243
    Joined:
    May 5, 2017
    I miss physical releases of old. I still have a few binders with my old games like Quake, Diablo, MDK, MechWarrior: Mercenaries, etc. Occasionally I will throw these on an older laptop (because rarely does the new stuff have an optical drive) and play them. I have to figure that if these had all been only available through proprietary storefonts, many of my games would no longer be available (without me having to buy a digital version), especially considering how volatile the gaming industry has been.
     
    SoFGR likes this.
  39. Deathroned

    Deathroned Gawd

    Messages:
    555
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2015
    Well Steam actually forbids that from happening, you are not allowed to sell a game cheaper on a direct competitor to steam.
     
    GoldenTiger likes this.
  40. Flogger23m

    Flogger23m [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,124
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Actually Valve did respond, they now offer 30%, 25% and 20% fees. The thresholds will cover the majority of the initial full priced sales though. The other advantage Epic has in Unreal Engine 4, which they'll waive their 4% fee for. And UE4 is the indie game engine of choice with games like BL3, The Outer Worlds and smaller studios/games. Valve has...Source 2.

    I'll copy/paste a post I made in another thread to show you how a developer may possibly make a good bit more profit by selling on EGS only:

    As for selling it for $50 on EGS and $70 on Steam the developers/publishers still won't get the extra margins from EGS and people will still complain that it costs more on Steam. Especially if the price difference is that large. Obviously it will make some people happy, but the majority will still be pissed at such a scenario.