Originally posted by cornelious0_0
good enough to make it count. No make sure she's stable and keep on rockin'.![]()
aight thanks man, is the best way to check for artifacts to play games or benchmark?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by cornelious0_0
good enough to make it count. No make sure she's stable and keep on rockin'.![]()
Originally posted by mtbaird
aight thanks man, is the best way to check for artifacts to play games or benchmark?
Originally posted by mtbaird
aight thanks man, is the best way to check for artifacts to play games or benchmark?
Originally posted by harmonic
Maybe I havn't been reading this topic for long enough, but if I'm not mistaken, it's ATItool
Originally posted by fr33ze
Crodaccio, im getting the same error message. when you click find max core does it instantly have loads of yellow dots appearing everywhere in the 3d view.
Originally posted by Crodaccio
Yes, have them !
But have this problem only in this test....no problem with games or other benches.
Originally posted by W1zzard
adding lights made no difference in my testing
Originally posted by mtbaird
whens version .17 expected to come out?
Originally posted by W1zzard
sooni have to stop adding new stuff so it can be properly tested
Originally posted by Jason711
by all means, keep adding cool shit!!![]()
Originally posted by Jason711
by all means, keep adding cool shit!!![]()
Originally posted by fr33ze
same here, it not a problem due to the card being clocked to high, it's software related somehow just can't figure it out yet. i thought i found a solution but didnt, i'll post here if i do figure out how to fix it.
Originally posted by Poison
Maybe u didn't read the readme of this tool........it says non-ATI cards can be checked for artifact with the help of third party overclocking software.......
anyway........anyone else know if this tool support artifact testing on DX7 card and xabre series card?????
Originally posted by Jason711
by all means, keep adding cool shit!!![]()
Originally posted by Stang Man
but not go furthur than being a simple overclocking tool
it's not a tweak program.![]()
Originally posted by W1zzard
source is not available - however if you have a certain question feel free to ask.
pixelshader 2.0 (renders the reddish background) is NOT required to run the rendering ... it just helps a lot to detect visual errors on 9500/9600/9700/9800
no worries about getting unneccessary stuff added .. i dont want to make another tweaker with tons of useless registry settings![]()
Originally posted by W1zzard
source is not available - however if you have a certain question feel free to ask.
pixelshader 2.0 (renders the reddish background) is NOT required to run the rendering ... it just helps a lot to detect visual errors on 9500/9600/9700/9800
no worries about getting unneccessary stuff added .. i dont want to make another tweaker with tons of useless registry settings![]()
Originally posted by Prez420
I got the same numbers with my 9800xt. Im thinking that the XTs are just stable overclocked pro versions. I think that XT speeds (stock) are quite enough for ANYTHING these days anyways.....
Originally posted by cornelious0_0
That's what I'm starting to think too. I'll bump it up to 430/800 for a 3 minute run of 3dmark to show a friend or something but I almost never have it OC'ed when I'm gaming. I'm sure when I get the rest of the mods done to my case It'll help a little and I'll find that happy medium. For now however, everything's fine at 412/730 and I don't care what anyone says.![]()
![]()
Originally posted by Imp
I got an error when running it
stopservice2: overlapped I/O Operation is in progress...
however that is not true I'm not running anything
Originally posted by W1zzard
0.0.17 out - http://atitool.ocfaq.com
Originally posted by Imp
I got an error when running it
stopservice2: overlapped I/O Operation is in progress...
however that is not true I'm not running anything
Originally posted by fr33ze
still having same problem
init of findmax: subsequent images are different. please report this bug.
i did really like the changes youv made though w1z
the new method is much better and the settings bit is really good as well, not over the top stuff, just useful options. spot on.
just looking forward to getting it working now, might have to resort to a reformat soon![]()