Digital Viper-X-
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2000
- Messages
- 15,210
I AM!
Already bought one, oh well
Thanks for the info, fellow Canuck. If I know anyone who's looking for this, I'll send 'em yer way.
Cheers!
ahhh too bad
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I AM!
Already bought one, oh well
Thanks for the info, fellow Canuck. If I know anyone who's looking for this, I'll send 'em yer way.
Cheers!
ahhh too badWe'll if you ever want more let me know
![]()
So it only works for GTA?Anyone located in / around the GTA can contact me.
The source I have is $300 new from Dell for #1 monitor, you might get a better deal if you're ordering 2+. If we all get it together it might be even cheaper![]()
Mine doesn't and so far no one else has had any either, so it seems in that regard, quality should be good and you are likely to receive a replacement without dead/stuck pixels or sub-pixels.
So it only works for GTA?
Dayum another thing to add to the "Montreal is jealous" thread...
I got my U2412M a few days ago, and it has a stuck pixel. When I display black, that one pixel is always blue.
So youre saying you have a source that beats even dell premium by 25%?
You're in for a surprise! This is going to be a huge upgrade GL2814.
PRAD says it have 93% sRGB coverage:
doesn't lack of full sRGB support defeats the purpose of buying U2412M as sRGB monitor over U2410 in the first place?and opposed to U2410 it is uncorrectable flaw...
... senna?
![]()
The U2410 has a bigger under-coverage of sRGB when in sRGB mode, so unless you are using it in Adobe RGB mode and using color management in a color managed program it will be worse for sRGB than the U2412M.
It's not a flaw, and it's actually quite a high coverage of sRGB.
What are you talking about?
U2410 has 100% sRGB coverage from what I see from prad.
Well, as I have seen happened to may others, DELL once again served the monitors a lot eariler than it was supposed to, ...so will need to spend a lot more time with them before I can make a conclusion, cant wait!!!
but I understand some people don't like AdobeRGB. As strange as it seems, there would be no point in having it and not using it I think...![]()
but actually everything looks so much better in aRGB and there is 100% sRGB coverage in this mode so when color-aware professional program demands it then it will get it
but I understand some people don't like AdobeRGB. As strange as it seems, there would be no point in having it and not using it I think...![]()
Can't really see in the picture but the top right has a bit of yellow tint and the bottm right has that glow, is that IPS glow or blacklight bleeding? How does my LCD look does it need to be exchanged?
Reading is KEY
The U2410 has a bigger under-coverage of sRGB when in sRGB mode, so unless you are using it in Adobe RGB mode and using color management in a color managed program it will be worse for sRGB than the U2412M.
It's not a flaw, and it's actually quite a high coverage of sRGB. If anything, the U2410's extended gamut is a bigger flaw, because in regular use, getting 120% of sRGB coverage yields screwed up colors. And if it's anything like the U2711, the sRGB mode on the U2410 will yield some not-so-perfect results because the gamut limiting is not exact in all parts of the spectrum.
understanding is also better than reading.
U2410 is a good monitor for sRGB color accurate work since you can use the AdobeRGB "preset".
Talking about sRGB or AdobeRGB outside a color managed environment has really no sense imho.
Thanks for posting that photo. Since I'm the same way and have a monitor coming, I've been wondering what effects come with taking a profile or settings with, say, brightness=40, and running them at 20. Does the whole thing, or certain settings, have to be recalibrated for that?Here's my U2412m:
![]()
I don't like it too bright so I'm just using a brightness of 20. Everthing looks fine except on a white page there seems to be a patch of black on the right side and left side as shown in the picture above on the the google page.
all content is intended to be viewed in a way so it looks best to viewerHow about the fact that 99% of all content is intended for display in sRGB.
U2412M if it match sRGB then it's perfect monitor for it's price. If it have less like PRAD measured it is only very good for it's price![]()
all content is intended to be viewed in a way so it looks best to viewer
for me sRGB display won't do...
all content is intended to be viewed in a way so it looks best to viewerfor me sRGB display won't do...
I've noticed when using 10e's settings or TFT's colour profile there is a noticeable red tinge to the screen. Has anyone else noticed anything like it? Do I have a defective panel or something?
I just recently purchased this screen after reading through this thread, While I've absolutely nothing bad to say about it, it's fantastic, I've noticed when using 10e's settings or TFT's colour profile there is a noticeable red tinge to the screen. Has anyone else noticed anything like it? Do I have a defective panel or something?
what I saied is that who care color works in a color managed environment,
who works in a color managed environment will find U2410 better than U2412 for both AdobeRGB and sRGB.
So your
Wide gamut > U2410, sRGB > U2412M
is a no sense to me![]()
Total rubbish.
If you have no interest in an sRGB display, then why are you in this thread? Asking to join Senna and Slanti on my ignore list?
U2412M if it match sRGB then it's perfect monitor for it's price. If it have less like PRAD measured it is only very good for it's price![]()