Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, I didnt want to come off so strongly. I just think one of the inherent problems with VGA connections are tinting issues and the appearance back lighting unevenness. even if there might be none when using a digital connection. Just trying to eliminate all potential sources of those issues other than the panel itself.
It's powered by kittens and fairy dust? It's probably just a bit of marketing nous i.e. redefining 'typical use' as something different than the definition they used for the older 2209WA (55W) There probably are some efficiency gains in the electronics and bulbs used as well, but honestly I wouldn't view this as being LED equivalent efficiency if that's what you are hoping for.
I think it's determined by the manufacture tolerance of how the LCD crystals are formed and aligned - LED edge lighting and LED grid lighting do nothing to improve matters. ColorComp correction and cherry picking panels is the only way to ensure improved (but still imperfect) uniformityMy personal view is that tinting is caused by uneven backlight and not the type of connector used.
That's pretty nice has anyone checked the 2209WA with the power meter for comparsion? I suspect it's not much worse than the new displays but any improvement is good.I just measured mine with a Kill-A-Watt - 28 watts! GREAT!
Old macs have gamma set at 1.8, lighter than the 2.2 value of newer macs and PCs. I suppose that's the difference.When going through the menu's on the screen there is a gamma setting for mac or pc. I am using a mac but what is the difference. By default it is set on pc.
I'm not sure what just happened but I connected the display via displayport and everything worked fine. But when I went into Sypder3 Pro to calibrate it an error came up then quit. But all of the dialog boxes were blacked out but when I scrolled over them the text came up. I restarted my computer and now the computer recognizes the display but the display doesnt show anything. I connected it via VGA from mini displayport from my mac and it works fine. Is it a crappy cable or is something wrong with the display?
How is the response time on the u2311h compared to the dell 2209wa ips? I'm concerned primarily with gaming. Is the 2209wa faster response than the u2311h?
I think it's determined by the manufacture tolerance of how the LCD crystals are formed and aligned - LED edge lighting and LED grid lighting do nothing to improve matters. ColorComp correction and cherry picking panels is the only way to ensure improved (but still imperfect) uniformity
That's pretty nice has anyone checked the 2209WA with the power meter for comparsion? I suspect it's not much worse than the new displays but any improvement is good.
How is the response time on the u2311h compared to the dell 2209wa ips? I'm concerned primarily with gaming. Is the 2209wa faster response than the u2311h?
I just received one of these today. I'm a n00b when it comes to those things. Is there anything in particular that i should look for? I've already checked for dead pixels, is there anything else i should be weary of that isn't easily detected at first glance?
The NEC 231wmi is 75hz, and these monitors uses the same panel? Why is not the u2311 75hz??
Here is the new calibration under Custom (RGB) Preset Mode with VGA. Brightness is at 44, Contrast 75, R 100, G 94, B 100. Also go to phase and decrease it to around 29, it was way to high out of the box.
http://www.mediafire.com/?vto4xdc3tnz
This is what i'm getting, except the lines are all vertical and they occupy only 1/4 of the screen:
http://www.laptoprepair101.com/wp-images/LCD-screen-no-image-2.jpg
According to TFTCentral it is the same LM230WF2 panel (except for the "SLA1" part in the model name, whatever that means).People are assuming it's the same without actually knowing. It definitely has some similar specs but it's not a proven fact or anything.
Huh? EA231WMi is 60 Hz too but it's "overclockable".The NEC 231wmi is 75hz, and these monitors uses the same panel? Why is not the u2311 75hz??
I'd suggest trying a different cable. Which input are you using now?
People are assuming it's the same without actually knowing. It definitely has some similar specs but it's not a proven fact or anything.
I used both the DVI and the VGA cable that came with the monitor, but no change.
UPDATE: I just unplugged the cable from the monitor and i still see the lines (this time its a bunch of colored vertical lines, but the area affected its the same), which means its neither the cable nor my machine. I'm assuming i just got a defective unit. Great.
How is yours now that you're using DisplayPort? Have any of your problems gone away or been mitigated? Specifically I'm referring to the picture quality.Yea most likely. RMA it
How is yours now that you're using DisplayPort? Have any of your problems gone away or been mitigated? Specifically I'm referring to the picture quality.
So... is this monitor a better choice than 2209wa if you don't care too much about being 1" bigger?
If I don't care they are basically the same quality? What about the color accuracy, black depth, and anti-glare coating? Are they about the same?Probably comes down to whether you care about 1080p that much.
If I don't care they are basically the same quality? What about the color accuracy, black depth, and anti-glare coating? Are they about the same?
My unscientific view is that U2311H looks a lot better. The coating is more intrusive than 2209WA but not nearly as bad as U2711. Others have already covered the color and contrast issues.
U2211H is 22" and is currently ~$30 cheaper than the old 2209WA. I'd consider that. It also does full 1080.
Huh? EA231WMi is 60 Hz too but it's "overclockable".