Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks great, though I'm not sure my 580GTX alone will be able to run at 19x12 with physx on...we shall see.
maybe! the 660ti can do it. . at an average of 60fps doesnt look like the game is crazy demanding or anything
oh were there benches that I've missed? or am I being extremely thick and this video was being shown on a 660ti with the settings listed?
I'd be a very happy camper if I could run with these settings on (and not have to get a secondary card!).
they listed it in some advertisements thats why theres a borderlands 2 promotion im sure
78 fps on average with a 660ti on max settings it said. unfortunately I have no link
i did find this though.
take this with a grain of salt though as it is from nvidia directly
http://www.ge force.com/Active/en_US/shared/images/embed/comparison-chart-660ti-470-260.png
its blocked so you'll have to type it in
Might try to get one of my old 460's back from a nephew so I can experiment with pairing it with my 7950. Wonder what the difference in performance is between a 460 and a 430 for PhysX? I could order a 430 today for sh*ts and giggles though.
Is it worthwhile enough of an experience getting it to work? Or something that I'm going to end up reinstalling my OS to get rid of the headache. No I'm not going to buy a 680 as I was just looking to have some fun with my PC. I'm very happy with my 7950 as is.
I don't recall the first Borderlands being all that GPU intensive when it was released...I doubt the second one will be, either.
http://www.primagames.com/games/borderlands-2/news/borderlands-2-interview-gearbox-software
Borderlands 2 should have better graphics that might push your PC a bit. I can't wait!
http://www.primagames.com/games/borderlands-2/news/borderlands-2-interview-gearbox-software
Borderlands 2 should have better graphics that might push your PC a bit. I can't wait!
I'm not planning on a new video card for at least a year. I don't see why I "need" physx for this game
Yes. There are games where PhysX can add to the atmosphere and visual experience.
Borderlands 2 is NOT one of them.
Yes. There are games where PhysX can add to the atmosphere and visual experience.
Borderlands 2 is NOT one of them.
Is TXAA going into BL2? I didn't see anything saying that was the case.
Yeah, its actually one of the first games that they used to advertise the feature. Google will come up with plenty of articles if you don't believe me.
it can but its nerfed to hell and nvidia forces game developers only to support gpu accelerated physX so the cpu support is useless which is why cpu physX still only supports 1 core. nvidia removed multi core support in physX when they bought it.
Do we know if we will have to bind FOV change to a key this time around?
It was very annoying in Borderlands 1.
Thanks for that link.
I'll buy it when it comes out to support them. (hopefully the slider is from 55-90 and not 55-65 )
But this... seems like real physx support. Anyone else feel like it's worth jumping jumping out of the AMD boat and swimming for the Nvidia yacht?
how is this 'real' PhysX support as opposed to Arkham City etc?...Arkham City had some nice PhysX effects but nothing I would deem as critical to gameplay or overall enjoyment of the game...Borderlands 2 will probably be the same...more cloth moving around, papers flying, debris fields etc
demo videos always exaggerate the effect...unless you stop and slo-mo everything the differences during fast motion gameplay are negligible
how is this 'real' PhysX support as opposed to Arkham City etc?...Arkham City had some nice PhysX effects but nothing I would deem as critical to gameplay or overall enjoyment of the game...Borderlands 2 will probably be the same...more cloth moving around, papers flying, debris fields etc
demo videos always exaggerate the effect...unless you stop and slo-mo everything the differences during fast motion gameplay are negligible
That loveletter thing was stupid as fuck and just listed off things that used to always come on PC games and were pretty much expected. Now they're being treated like it's some kinda special treatment to the PC gamers to win us over or something.
Have zero interest in the game anyways
AMD fanbois pouring on the hate on Nvidia's slowly growing PhysX support. I would rather be mad at AMD for not adding their own GPU Physics support instead ? The fight between CPU or GPU Physics support and if we need it or not gets tiring. I mean if a GPU company ponies up support and $$$ to use their GPU PhysX rather than Dev Company building their own from scratch... which would you chose?
That loveletter thing was stupid as fuck and just listed off things that used to always come on PC games and were pretty much expected. Now they're being treated like it's some kinda special treatment to the PC gamers to win us over or something. Have zero interest in the game anyways
how is this 'real' PhysX support as opposed to Arkham City etc?...Arkham City had some nice PhysX effects but nothing I would deem as critical to gameplay or overall enjoyment of the game...Borderlands 2 will probably be the same...more cloth moving around, papers flying, debris fields etc
demo videos always exaggerate the effect...unless you stop and slo-mo everything the differences during fast motion gameplay are negligible
LOL @ all the hate for Physx from AMD owners while deep down they wish they could go into the video options and enable those yummy particle effects.