I'd rather have the distinction come from a logo ([H] or RatPadz or whatever) than the curve. Functionally I'm just not a fan of the curve.
agreed, i would rather have the logo than the curve, if it was either or, but would prefer to have both!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd rather have the distinction come from a logo ([H] or RatPadz or whatever) than the curve. Functionally I'm just not a fan of the curve.
Well, I wouldn't want a cursed mouse pad either.Larger size + no curse + 1~2mm thinner please!
Oh, so this is purely from a gaming perspective.Please note that there are multiple mousing preferences for gaming. Also note that the large majority of pro-gamer's personal preferences for mousing style directly refute your "High sensitivity is better" statements.
Yes; Is this site not primarily slanted toward computer hardware as it relates to games and gaming?Oh, so this is purely from a gaming perspective.
The point wasn't that "you have to do what pro gamers do" but that people should stop saying that large mousepads are retarded, and realize that large pad/low sens is an extremely valid preference.Still, fuck pro gamers. I like high sensitivity in all uses. How's that for direct refuting?
This site != Ratpadz. And this site is a computer hardware forum with many forums not pertaining to gaming. Hard|OCP, sure, but gaming just happens to be one of the most popular methods of measuring and pushing hardware performance.Yes; Is this site not primarily slanted toward computer hardware as it relates to games and gaming?
Only if you stop saying the opposite in the same manner. See how that works?The point wasn't that "you have to do what pro gamers do" but that people should stop saying that large mousepads are retarded, and realize that large pads are an extremely valid preference.
But... we ARE talking about Ratpadz. In a thread about them...This site != Ratpadz. And this site is a computer hardware forum with many forums not pertaining to gaming. Hard|OCP, sure, but gaming just happens to be one of the most popular methods of measuring and pushing hardware performance.
Point out where I did, even once, Lol. See how that works? I was advocating that there are different ways of using a mouse and people don't need to be calling a whole segment worthless when it's obviously not; and backed up by plenty of evidence to the contrary.Only if you stop saying the opposite in the same manner. See how that works?
Oh, okay. That means only gamers can buy and use them, and only for gaming. You win.But... we ARE talking about Ratpadz. In a thread about them...
"Ratpadz mousing surfaces are designed "By Gamers - For Gamers!"
Hmm. Okay:Point out where I did, even once, Lol.
Just crazy! But, alas, I responded to your post and, in jest, paralleled your blanket claim by calling those who prefer low sensitivity crazy. But you lose ten points for the LOL.All you people asking for square mousepads in 14x14 or 12x12 are crazy.
My mistake, then. Clearly you rounded up the large majority of pro-gamers and had some fun with surveys. You win.Also note that the large majority of pro-gamer's personal preferences for mousing style directly refute your "High sensitivity is better" statements.
Even people who don't care about cars and just want an A-B daily driver are welcome to buy a Corvette, but do you think the designers are looking to cater to those people when they create next year's model?Oh, okay. That means only gamers can buy and use them, and only for gaming. You win..
Heh. So wait, your response to my saying that there is no reason for a square mousepad was to say there is no reason for low sensitivity and then go on a rant about non gaming uses? Ok. Well, I had a logical reason behind my statement that didn't even have anything to do with gaming or sensitivity; (You left it out of your quote, surely by accident) Where is yours? I have yet to encounter a common use for a square mousepad of the size being suggested in this thread, unless you just like having extra plastic you wont use (but had to pay for) hanging off your pad on the top. Common computer displays aren't square, for gaming or otherwise. A physical surface designed to emulate traversing your virtual layout of pixels should roughly equal it's aspect ratio. Even you stated that you only move up and down with your fingers on your surface and left to right with your wrist. If you can find a common usage that gamers or others would have for a square-aspect mousepad over a rectangle beyond some extremely specific setup or application, then I'll recant the statement.Just crazy! But, alas, I responded to your post and, in jest, paralleled your blanket claim by calling those who prefer low sensitivity crazy. But you lose ten points for the LOL.
I suppose it was wrong of me to include myself in your crazy claim since my posts prior to yours was personal experience.
You don't need to take surveys to know that a common pro race driver on a non-oval track is generally going to approach a turn from the outside edge, touch the inside apex, then exit on the outside edge. Nothing is forcing every driver in the race to drive like that and some may pick a different line, but that's going to be the majority.My mistake, then. Clearly you rounded up the large majority of pro-gamers and had some fun with surveys. You win.
Once Kyle has decided on a size (14x12 seems to be the consensus), a poll should be made so we can duke it out on the curve aspect. As of now it appears to be a 60/40 pro curve.
Functionally I'm just not a fan of the curve.