![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
![Zarathustra[H]](https://cdn.hardforum.com/data/avatars/m/9/9298.jpg?1714700655){kind=avatar}
100+ people? Really!? Such a sample size.
Ask yourself this: Are people who own AMD cards playing Project Cars? Are peopl ebuying GPUs playing Project Cars? Is Project Cars one of the newest, top-end (graphically) racing games for PC? Yes? Well then I'd say that it's a viable title to use. Don't you think that a Project Cars player looking to upgrade his card would be interested to see how AMD cards perform? And if it's garbage, is that [H]'s fault or ProjectCars'/AMD's?
Furthermore, think about what you are saying: You want [H] only to test games that perform well on both platforms. WHAT THE HELL GOOD WILL THAT DO?! You'd never test the newest, hardest games (graphically) and all your charts would show equal performance.
That's it... you're getting the Fillion.
You mean the game they took off their testing group a while back because it's so old? I mean, it was a great game, and graphically demanding, but it's no longer pushing the boundaries of what's possible.
Okay, variant of GCN 1.2 then if you want to be pedantic
Fiji has several optimizations that Hawaii does not have.
Is the architecture any different from Tonga?Okay, variant of GCN 1.2 then if you want to be pedantic
That does make sense, the same tessellation upgrades from Tonga were rolled into Fiji AFAIK.
A- Crysis3 may be demanding but it no longer represents the newest in graphical technology. There are new uses of AA, SSAO, textures, tessellation and other tech that it does not employ.
B- it's old and no one (relatively) is playing it anymore.
C- those are both from Castle. Know your Fillion.
How many different ways do people run tessellation?!?! It's still executed the same way on the hardware level with some differences between AMD and NVIDIA....
Something is definitely wrong with fiji..............even when you look at the previous drama with AOS.
This is what you look like to everyone with that silly statement.
Also, on topic, AMD's drivers have always been AMD's downfall. This is coming from a guy who's used ATI/AMD for the last decade....and then I got sick of it and switched to my 980. AMD is going to have to do a lot to get me back.
Makes me sad, but I just don't have the kind of money to waste on simple brand loyalty.
I see very little wrong with [H]'s methods.
This is what you look like to everyone with that silly statement.
Also, on topic, AMD's drivers have always been AMD's downfall. This is coming from a guy who's used ATI/AMD for the last decade....and then I got sick of it and switched to my 980. AMD is going to have to do a lot to get me back.
Makes me sad, but I just don't have the kind of money to waste on simple brand loyalty.
I see very little wrong with [H]'s methods.