AMD EPYC Rome 64-Core Server Versus Intel Dual Socket Xeon Platinum Benchmark

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by cageymaru, Nov 6, 2018.

  1. cageymaru

    cageymaru [H]ard|News

    Messages:
    19,256
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    HotHardware has video of the C-Ray raytracing benchmark shown at the AMD Horizon Event. The AMD exhibit demonstrated just how powerful the new 7nm EPYC Rome architecture is with its new chiplet design that was leaked by AdoredTV. An Intel 8180M dual socket Xeon Platinum CPU server with 56 cores total and 112 threads was matched against a single AMD Zen 2 EPYC Rome 64-core CPU based server. Needless to say, the 7nm AMD EPYC Rome CPU easily won the battle. AMD CEO Dr. Lisa Su says that the 7nm EPYC Rome CPU will be a 64-core, 128-thread processor. The entire slideshow can be viewed here. Thanks juanrga !


    In addition, AMD has been able to add some security enhancements with Zen 2 as well, including hardware mitigation for recently discovered Spectre CPU vulnerabilities. AMD has also increased the number of encryption keys for virtualization to allow companies to support more virtual machines. Infinity Fabric is now in its second generation, and I/O per die has been optimized to improve both latency and power. While Infinity Fabric itself is being kept on a 14nm process, the accompanying chipset for Zen will be built on 7nm.
     
    juanrga, Chimpee, NoNRG and 6 others like this.
  2. DejaWiz

    DejaWiz Oracle of Unfortunate Truths

    Messages:
    18,570
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    I want a dual socket Rome system...not that I need it, but want it purely for SnG's.
     
  3. ecuador

    ecuador Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    206
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    But ... can it run Crysis?
     
    Aioeyu likes this.
  4. drescherjm

    drescherjm [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,219
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008

    Is this correct / true?
     
  5. Verado

    Verado Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    150
    Joined:
    May 16, 2017
    Holy hot sauce
     
    DocNo likes this.
  6. cageymaru

    cageymaru [H]ard|News

    Messages:
    19,256
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    If you look at the CPU there is a huge 14nm section in the middle and 7nm cores around it.

    amd-next-horizon-Chiplet_design.jpg
    big_amd-epyc-zen-2-64-core-cpu.jpg.jpg
     
  7. J3RK

    J3RK [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,014
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    cageymaru likes this.
  8. N4CR

    N4CR 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,517
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Yes. They explained that they can't shrink the 14nm I/O and analogue circuits as much as the other digital circuits which mostly consist of the rest of CPUs .
    It also frees up die space for CPU cache on chiplets. These should be quite fast..and extremely efficient.
     
    jnemesh, Vercinaigh and drescherjm like this.
  9. Catboxer

    Catboxer [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,045
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    That thing is as big as all outdoors!
     
    N4CR likes this.
  10. aaronspink

    aaronspink [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,438
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    I'd put good money that the CPU chips are just 7nm ryzens with functionality fuzed off. This allows them to strip functionality off of the base ryzen die (1 off chip I/O block that is PCIe in desktop and hub link in server, simplified memory controller, etc) thus reducing desktop costs and having better overall binning options. Very little point in doing two separate 8C die designs for them between desktop and server.
     
  11. freeloader1969

    freeloader1969 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,241
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Quite a few instances of Crysis can be run on this. You could probably use the CPU alone to render Crysis; albeit at under 30 FPS. LOL...
     
  12. N4CR

    N4CR 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,517
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    They wouldn't separate the designs at all for the chiplets, could just use a smaller IO chip for desktop.
    One thing they did mention was using different processes for different chips, e.g. LP or HP versions. That will be amazing for laptops and maybe even for high end if they go for that part of the workstation/HEDT market.
    7nm zen must be quite a decent re-design, doubt it's a shrunk zen core. Wrong shape to boot and too small, they shaved it and made the cache in the middle, it's the only way they can get the 8core CCX going.
     
  13. steakman1971

    steakman1971 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,433
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    That's one big fn chip. Kind of reminds me of the chip from Terminator 2.
     
    elite.mafia and N4CR like this.
  14. N4CR

    N4CR 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,517
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Here you go, clearly cut most of the die off for these chiplets. Even though density is 2x, it takes often more transistors to make the same thing at a smaller node.
    epyc vs epyc 2.png
     
    gxp500 and Stimpy88 like this.
  15. Chris_B

    Chris_B [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,997
    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Thats a hunka chunka cpu :eek:
     
  16. viper1152012

    viper1152012 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,025
    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Dang thats a lot of processor
     
  17. cdr_74_premium

    cdr_74_premium [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    If someone came to [H] back in 2013-ish and said that's how things would be going down in 2018 for AMD, what would he get?

    yes... an unmesurable amount of dee-doo.

    This is just amazing.
     
  18. Riccochet

    Riccochet Off Topic Award

    Messages:
    21,345
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Man, AMD ain't fuckin around!
     
    Virtual_Bomber, jnemesh and Stimpy88 like this.
  19. Galvin

    Galvin 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,688
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2002
    Thanks to AMD we wont be stuck on 4core cpus from intel for the next 10 years
    What a scary thought
     
  20. psyclist

    psyclist Gawd

    Messages:
    843
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    So it looks like a 16 core Zen2 design is a go? I wonder if it will be the same MCM design or a monolithic design, they did mention something about 2 different strategies I believe. If they can release a 16/32 mainstream chip with decent clocks, man...amazing!

    A 2S server with 128/256 worth of processor is a little mind blowing. The top Intel solution will be 96/192 and likely clocked lower because of the 14nm design, but this requires a whole new socket. Man AMD is killin it on the CPU front these days...Love that they can beat a 2S Platinum setup with a single socketed chip. Rome shaping up to be a huge disrupter, this is where the industry wakes up to AMD I think.

    Also, Threadripper 3950X inbound? (y) I smell a new rig in the making!
     
    Pocatello likes this.
  21. cdr_74_premium

    cdr_74_premium [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    It's also incredible to see how spinning the fabs out turned out for them. That was considered a massive mistake back when it happened - and it was in some ways, GloFo exclusivity and so on - but with the right strategy, it means they're nimble and can focus on making kickass chips. All the while Intel struggles with... yeah.

    I've said it before, but it bears repeating... welcome back, AMD!
     
  22. tacos4me

    tacos4me Gawd

    Messages:
    774
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    People were making fun of me for picking up AMD @ ~$3/share just a few years ago.

    Good times ahead it seems.
     
  23. KazeoHin

    KazeoHin [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,766
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    It does not generally take more transistors to do the same thing, rather the design of transistors needs to be completely changed, and often the extra shrinkage is used to fill in more architectural 'fattening', but yes, I agree with you that those chiplets are most likely free of I/O and other bloat, and the only way we'll see these little guys on a desktop CPU is with a separate I/O controller chip like in Rome.
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2018
    Darth Kyrie and N4CR like this.
  24. cdr_74_premium

    cdr_74_premium [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    I was kicking myself for not having any spare money to do so just out of principle. You know, keep the underdog floating and all, even though they were pumping out mostly junk.

    I am not getting any profit, but it's hard to not get all warm and fuzzy when a turnaround like AMD happen. I can't wait to reach the point in which I can build a brand new rig, because I'll go full retard on two AMD beasts, one for me and one for my wife, celebrating all the K6s, Athlons and Durons that served me so well in the past!

    Now, if they manage to pull that on the GPU front as well, that'll be massively EPYC indeed!
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2018
  25. aaronspink

    aaronspink [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,438
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Um, your photo says literally nothing. They are two completely different processes from 2 completely different companies with completely different physical design constraints and thus physical design. Anyone trying to base what's on the new one off of the physical size of the old one is at best guessing.
     
  26. Nobu

    Nobu 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,770
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Well, their guess is as good as yours....
    imho, if a separate i/o chip adds minimal latency, then there is zero reason not to and just about every reason to share chips between server and desktop like they have been. The exception would be to add more than 8c per die, but I see no reason that couldn't be shared too, although they'd probably limit it to the high end desktop chips.
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2018
  27. ZiggyDeath

    ZiggyDeath Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    222
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2017
    Oh man, can't wait for this to trickle down into Zen 2. 1700 is feeling long toothed.
     
  28. jmilcher

    jmilcher [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,118
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Does it have hdmi?
     
  29. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,097
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    personally i think a lot of credit has to go to Lisa Su.. i honestly don't think AMD would be where it's currently at without her.
     
    Darth Kyrie likes this.
  30. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,440
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Slideshow files set to private :/
     
  31. GreenOrbs

    GreenOrbs Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    346
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2017
    For sure, Lisa Su has done a great job turning things around. Some credit probably also goes to Jim Keller who seems to have a golden touch (K8, Apple chips, and Zen). Now that Intel is struggling, guess who they've hired...
     
  32. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,097
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    true.. that's also the beauty of being an independent contract engineer, get to pick and choose who you work with and make bank in the process.
     
    Darth Kyrie likes this.
  33. Brahmzy

    Brahmzy [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,955
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
  34. Trimlock

    Trimlock [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,059
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    interesting chip design, there was talk about something like this a while ago where the "CPU" circled around what is essentially the IO.

    I doubt this thing will sip power though, that IO package is absolutely massive.
     
  35. NoNRG

    NoNRG 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,126
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Lisa Su in that video reminding the guy "But [dont say] the freqeuncy!" was pretty hillarious.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2018
  36. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,097
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    it was actually meant to be a joke, but i was really hoping after she finished talking she was going to say "oh yeah i almost forgot it was running and so and so Ghz" just to troll the reporters.
     
    jnemesh likes this.
  37. Meaker

    Meaker Official representative of powernotebooks.com!

    Messages:
    924
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    I am interested how everything is interconnected. Do each pair of chips communicate together? Do they each have access to a pair of DDR channels as a priority? A deep dive is going to be very interesting.
     
  38. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,097
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008


    definitely worth watching, he refuses to go deeper into architecture but still gives hints through various questions about how rome works..

    also i want to see that 2P rome system running with 256 threads.
     
  39. 5150Joker

    5150Joker 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,923
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    My next pc is going to be Zen 2, AMD needs to hurry up and release it.
     
    cageymaru likes this.
  40. Pieter3dnow

    Pieter3dnow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,492
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    I'm sure that if you call AMD and want to buy a Zen 2 based server they will take your order , that is if you want it fast ...