GoldenTiger
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2004
- Messages
- 29,992
they could of kept the same socket for SB. but you know intel they want to mak as much money as posible so they put out a new cpu and socket. like i said before they havent tapped the full potential of all the i's sockets. this is all a money scheme to try and get as much as possible out of you. intel is notorious for doing this. just look at amd. they have not changed sockets at all for all their cpus. am2 and am3's are all compatible with all their current cpu's. intel you suck a big one. thats why i will not upgrade anytime soon as my q6600 at 3.2 is very much alive and well for daily use and some gaming. will keep all my money where it belongs, in my pocket, not intel socket. for god sake, how long have we been at less than 3.6gig on cpu. they cant even pass the magical number of 4gig. they have hit a wall for cpu for the time being. yes you can oc your cpu 4gig or more, but im talking about selling cpu's past 4gig and beyond. cpu's range is just 2gig to 3.6gig thats really not much when it comes to changing the sockets. i understand changing from 775 to all the i's sockets due to ddr3's advantage over ddr2's. so there this is my 2 cents worth. have a good one. and again you suck INTEL....
Uh, ok... someone doesn't understand chipsets breaking compatibility with older CPU's or vice versa (you can't just stick a new CPU onto an X58 chipset that is Sandy Bridge based for example even if they were socket-compatible). The different pin counts are to help stop people like you from trying to do so and then frying their components
Yeah, I have nearly the same specs as you do on my desktop CPU (and I do no gaming on my desktop because I have an X800 GPU). I have not owned an Intel Desktop CPU (I'm typing on my Intel laptop at the moment) since my Pentium II 266. I was pretty set on the AMD Hexacores for my build next month, but Sandy Bridge has my attention because I don't want to build a "dead" platform (I would like to be able to swap out my CPU without chaging boards for my next-next machine)
Motherboard swapping comes with the territory most of the time nowadays... chipset revisions require new boards
Core i7-950:£234Asus P6X58D-E£140
Both subject to a discount of 5% if I buy before midnight today and free shipping.
Sandy Bridge all the way... it's not even a contest for speed, even with only dual-channel vs. triple-channel on the RAM. 5.3-5.4ghz on air with Prolimatech Megahalems from latest early results on XS... add in a nicer IPC giving about 10% more per clock, and you're zooming compared to a 3.7-4.0ghz i7 Nehalem/Bloomfield family CPU. These things are faster than 980x's (6-core) at most tests, even when they are heavily threaded.
-----
Planning on upgrading my 920 @ 3.72ghz to a 2500K or 2600K + Gigabyte P67A-UD5 @ 5ghz+... at or near launch. Frequency alone will give a nice ~40% boost if I reach 5.2ghz, and the extra IPC would be good for another ~14% vs. the 920 there. With my needs including encodes, modeling, content creation, and compute crunching, in addition to just gaming (which also sees a nice boost I gather...) it's an easy decision. I won't personally see a huge gaming boost other than some RTS since I run 2560x1600 with a GTX 580 (single @ 860c/4400m) necessarily, but if I go SLI again or get another new card once the 28nm generation launches, I sure will.