TroyTalksNoMore
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2004
- Messages
- 6,192
It never was a game, it was just a crowdfunding experiment & some people got paid very well for a few years...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes sir. I was running at 4k then dropped it to 1440p. Everyone in game chat said it was normal.
Bullshit. I want to pop in every few months and see if it's still a pile of crap. The screenies just give me more to sift through.
I'd rather read real opinions than a circle jerk of screen shots. I have an Avenger and actually spent more than I would have liked on that... I'd like to actually use it one day.
The criticisms with nothing in retort are more useful to me than shallow screen shots.
I blew $50 on this "game" and do NOT feel that I got my money's worth...
Anyone else?
I am in the same boat. I put money towards Star Citizen before it was broken into two games ... fact is very little of what was promised has been delivered and timelines were never met.I blew $50 on this "game" and do NOT feel that I got my money's worth...
Anyone else?
I blew $50 on this "game" and do NOT feel that I got my money's worth...
Anyone else?
Problem is, the majority of "criticism" (read: trolling) is done by people who have never played or supported the game in the first place. So, while they are entitled to their "opinion" about the game, they hold basically zero actual weight in evaluating the product itself.
Poe, is that you?Spent way too much money on SC and have no regrets. Its going to be a awesome game eventually. But for me its more about the journey and what SC stands for more than anything. Bringing a living breathing world with amazing fidelity to the users fingertips. Its the closest thing to experiencing space I will ever get. That feeling you get when you land on a planet and watch the sun rise just blows blows me away.
Problem is, the majority of "criticism" (read: trolling) is done by people who have never played or supported the game in the first place. So, while they are entitled to their "opinion" about the game, they hold basically zero actual weight in evaluating the product itself.
I hear this same comment when it comes to games in general and it makes zero sense...you don't need to buy a game to determine whether or not you like it...that is totally silly...I'm not referring to Star Citizen but just games in general...so everyone needs to buy every single game they may be interested in before they are entitled to voice an opinion on it?...no way...that's what impressions from sources such as gaming review sites that you trust, other player reviews, YouTube/Twitch etc are for---to determine if you will like the game or not...I've been interested in games early on only to find out later that it wasn't what I was looking for (or maybe it's not worth full price but will buy it when it goes on sale)
so many variables in play when it comes down to purchasing a game...the Eurogamer Alpha 3.0 article was well written and just because it's overall impressions were on the disappointing side every fan of the game will look for reasons to minimize it's relevance...telling people to spend money on Star Citizen to make their opinions valid is ridiculous
you said that 'the majority of "criticism" (read: trolling) is done by people who have never played or supported the game in the first place'...my point is that you don't need to have played or paid for it to criticize it
...if you see or read about something about the game then that is valid criticism...only time it becomes not valid is if the information is false...
I admit I haven't played any of the 3.0 stuff, waiting for it to mature a bit.
I love how people start having fun in Star Citizen again and the people who need to just be haters to be haters come out of the wood works,
but if you are looking for advice about the game from critics who have never actually played the game (of which there are MANY when it comes to Star Citizen), that advice really isn't going to be valuable as far as determining the quality of the game.
Much of the criticism of CIG has less to do with the gameplay and more to do with Crobberts performance over the last 5 years, his history, the recent developments and news about the game, etc. Which makes sense because there's really not a hell of a lot of gameplay to criticize.
You don't have to have played the game to look at things like the Jennison letter, their ever increasingly sleazy sales tactics that still aren't quite pulling in the same amount of money, Crobberts recent statements/performance/failures, etc, and come to the conclusion that the thing is a shitshow that's extremely unlikely to succeed in a meaningful way.
If you want to discuss the business side of it, this thread is not the place.
If you want to discuss the business side of it, this thread is not the place.
According to whom?
32 gb helps? Hmmm. I wonder what it actually uses. Probably bc of it not being optimized. I would think more than 16 gb but less than 32 gb.
Looks like the F8C will be available in the PU after you unlock it by playing through SQ42. It also looks like there may be some other unlocks as well, nothing confirmed though. I want that fancy Gold F8C though lol