![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
I got the Ergotron MX arm and installed it on the 39".
I wouldn't recommend it though, because there's not enough height extension for the monitor to clear the desk - at most it will go at a maybe 5% tilt backwards, with the bottom bezel resting on the desk. The VESA mount holes are just too high on the TV.
Really close to pulling the trigger on the 39" with that stand but my GPU doesn't have HDMI out, only DVI-D and Display port
anyone if this monoprice displayport-HDMI adapter would work?
It can do 4k @30Hz but don't expect the bandwidth of 1440P @ 135Hz as reported possible over DVI since HDMI is actually DVI single link (with some un-needed extras)What about a DVI-D to HDMI?
I noticed a review on Amazon stating that it worked, but don't know if I can trust that.
I wonder why the adapters won't work as both DVI D and Display support 4k AFAIK
Yes but it is more in terms of input lag than visuals.
I tried 60 vs 120 it was smoother but not a night and day difference nice but not as good as a better screen that is for sure.
What about a DVI-D to HDMI?
I noticed a review on Amazon stating that it worked, but don't know if I can trust that.
I wonder why the adapters won't work as both DVI D and Display support 4k AFAIK
You could house them internally since the monitor has quite a lot of space internally since it is huge and those boards aren't that big I'm excellent in stacking pcbs together.
It Sadly was the whole screen with half the horizontal lines so line nothing line which gives a blured image but enough to see what was on the screen I concur that this would be hard to have the driver understand as you would need a 4x duplicate that somehow fills only those lines.
I suggest any connection be it DP HDMI or DVI all suffice for this HDMI however is a licensed standard not that that matters for board that are already made.
Ideally, we'd want a board that can do either 4K60 and 4K120, unless you had to stick to one. I'd be wanting to go all the way to 4K120 as my $1000 pledge is conditional on 4K120.
If overclocked, perhaps. You'd want to make it strong and robust enough to be a 4K60 to a reliably overclockable to 4K120Hz (Since 4K60Hz over one DVI cable is beyond DVI spec, but technically reachable via an overclock, as 2560x1440 120Hz is fairly close to 3840x2160 60Hz). But for non-overclocked, you need 2xDP for 4K120Hz.
Dual link DVI doesn't have a max pixel clock specification.
1097MHz with cvt reduced blanking but even if you had no blanking in the stream (no monitor is that tolerant) you would need 995MHz for 3840x2160 @ 120Hz.
What about 4:2:2 instead of 4:4:4?
A single DP connector would need a spliter to get the links devided in the various boards which is not something available or easily made.
Any chance you can remove the EMI shield and take some pictures underneath it?
You pay for the IGZO panel's R&D + a huge early adopters fee + the extra driver board.
Hey MikeI may as well join this conversation. Hey maarten12100
Actually the panel datasheet tells us most of what we need to know. For instance we know the panel takes 4-channel LVDS which can interpret either VESA or JEIDA packing, we know that it is made to run at up to 120Hz (awesome), and interestingly it is 3D-capable. We also know (unfortunately) that it is apparently interlaced pixel arrangement, which makes driving interesting.
Starting to think this might be best handled by an FPGA... four inputs of x format, four independent LVDS outputs, and a FPGA to take these and twiddle the bit packing around to produce the proper drive format for the panel.
The photos show that they're not ribbon cables, they're discrete wire twisted pairs. I only see two connectors, and it is very common for two LVDS channels to share a connector (where they are referred to as "odd" and "even" channels, presumably for which of the interlaced set they carry). The panel datasheet notes not "odd" and "even" but "first pixel", "second pixel" etc, which is why I think it's so likely that it's 4-channel interlaced.
I've read the pdf just not couldn't because we had a massive power issue down here and nearly all electronics are currently fried. (380V instead of 220/240)
This isn't correct. You only need 64 megabytes of memory for framebuffering two 30-bit frames of 4K. If you need four framebuffers for any reason (e.g. overdrive history framebuffers, OSD overlay framebuffers) then just go for 128 megabytes.
Monitors only need to framebuffer a frame or two (not a full second's worth), so you only need 64 megabytes of RAM to framebuffer two 30-bit frames of 3840x2160. This is pretty cheap.
That much memory isn't needed...
Confirming the refresh pattern of the SEIKI can be determined by pointing a high-speed camera at the TestUFO: Flicker Test [WARNING: Do not click if epileptic] running in Chrome browser. High speed cameras such as Casio EX-FC200S and EX-ZR200 can be had for just $200 off eBay, and have a 480fps and 1000fps mode. I used such a high-speed camera with a pre-launch version of TestUFO to create High Speed Video of a 120Hz Monitor.