Still same difference since performance is what actually matters at the end of the day. Or you would rather have a Nerburst?
I'm one to buy the product, not the story. Marketing says X but I don't really care about the label. I care about the performance and value. What actual performance will I get in the applications I will use, and how much do I have to pay for that performance.
It's a moot point for me anyway, as the soonest I'll be able to afford anything new is next year's tax returns, if even then.
I agree with you. The question is, why doesn't AMD?At the end of the day are they really missing out on performance? Do the people crying even own these $500 chips? My guess is no on both parts. This is off topic but I hate the culture of people complaining about shit on behalf of others.