cannondale06
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 16,180
really? I thought I read a review saying that trees could not be shot down.I shot a tree down yesterday when playing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
really? I thought I read a review saying that trees could not be shot down.I shot a tree down yesterday when playing.
We really don't have to even go that far. For anyone to just flat out say that the graphics suck, well then pretty much every game's graphics must suck then. Most games on the PC simply don't look this good.
really? I thought I read a review saying that trees could not be shot down.
might have been some scripted event then. there have been numerous comments about trees not being able to be shot down like in the original game. in fact nearly all of the non scripted event destruction has been removed from I have read.Dunno. I was in the middle of a fire fight with some CELL people and as I run away and turned around and fired some more a tree came down.
might have been some scripted event then. there have been numerous comments about trees not being able to be shot down like in the original game. in fact nearly all of the non scripted event destruction has been removed from I have read.
well fire the game up with FRAPS recording on and shoot down a tree then.It would have to be some pretty darn specific scripting since I just randomly lead the AI into that area because I was running away to heal.
well fire the game up with FRAPS recording on and shoot down a tree then.![]()
I saw some vids on youtube of people trying but no dice, not even a limb. and I know I have read in threads on other forums where it could not be done. maybe its only certain areas.I'll need to get to a spot with a tree again. Or remember to do it. I actually thought about testing it after seeing that, but totally forgot.
I saw some vids on youtube of people trying but no dice, not even a limb. and I know I have read in threads on other forums where it could not be done.
Those screens do look decent to me.
But am I correct in understanding that you can no longer shoot or smash the trees down?
I really hope something good comes from the mod community after the mod tools are released. The lighting engine alone should provide a huge improvement over CryEngine 2. It's a shame Crytek overdoes the bloom so much, because the global illumination is pretty amazing at times.
Stealing these shots from another forum (credit goes to DenisK4):
![]()
![]()
nice try but the actual game looked no where near that good in most places.Crysis 1 [2007]
http://www6.incrysis.com/screenshots/c32maz.jpg
http://www6.incrysis.com/screenshots/0009208v7.jpg
http://www6.incrysis.com/screenshots/1ytom.jpg
http://www6.incrysis.com/screenshots/0003335mxn.jpg
There's just no room for debate between which game looks better at this moment.
nice try but the actual game looked no where near that good in most places.
no you can find a few places like that but 95% of the game looks worse. inside environments were horrendous looking and not much improvement over even Far Cry.It didn't look anywhere near that good anywhere. Even the best custom configs didn't get it to that level. Well the water got to that point.
anybody can post images from Crysis 1 and Warhead that look no where near as good as those and you know it. nice cherry picking though as some of those are not even from the actual game anyway.I'm not "try"ing anything. Crysis 1 looks better than Crysis 2.
no you can find a few places like that but 95% of the game looks worse. inside environments were horrendous looking and not much improvement over even Far Cry.
anybody can post images from Crysis 1 and Warhead that look no where near as good as those and you know it. nice cherry picking though as some of those are not even from the actual game anyway.
and so am I. I fired up Crysis and Warhead and MOST of the game is not impressive looking today as it was in 2007. Crysis 2 has some bland textures, foliage no better looking than Crysis 1 and some over saturated colors. other than that its pretty decent looking and easily equals Crysis 1 in most areas.If by cherry picking you mean spending roughly 10 seconds copying and pasting images I've found at that site's Crysis 1 repository of nice looking pictures -- then I'm guilty.
More than 95% of Crysis 2 doesn't look as good as the 5% of Crysis 1. Do you think I take joy or have an agenda by proclaiming this? Just trying to put some perspective in the discussion.
and so am I. I fired up Crysis and Warhead and MOST of the game is not impressive looking today as it was in 2007. Crysis 2 has some bland textures, foliage no better looking than Crysis 1 and some over saturated colors. other than that is pretty decent looking.
nice try but the actual game looked no where near that good in most places.
I'd argue that is wasn't even impressive looking in 2007, but thats just me.
well the vistas were pretty good for the time. with mods it could be quite stunning but yeah the standard version was lacking in many areas. it was odd that very high made some things look worse than high or even medium in some cases.I'd argue that is wasn't even impressive looking in 2007, but thats just me.
Then you'd be arguing with an overwhelming majority of people who still regard it as the pinnacle of pc graphics. I think you're just trying to be outlandish; and that's ok -- just letting you know what you'd be getting into.
I'm not remotely impressed by graphics. Crysis 1 looked good, in fact it looked great. But so what? You want me to be impressed with a game I want more than a pretty picture. If I want to stare are pretty pictures I'll go to a bloody art gallery. I haven't been impressed by graphics since the 90s.
nice try but the actual game looked no where near that good in most places.
anybody can post images from Crysis 1 and Warhead that look no where near as good as those and you know it. nice cherry picking though as some of those are not even from the actual game anyway.
no you can find a few places like that but 95% of the game looks worse. inside environments were horrendous looking and not much improvement over even Far Cry.
Well since the past half dozen posts or so have been made solely about the comparison of graphics between the 2 games you'll have to excuse me when I just assumed you were also posting in regards to it.
Stealing these shots from another forum (credit goes to DenisK4):
![]()
![]()
Crysis 1 [2007]
modded pictures to try and win an argument
There's just no room for debate between which game looks better at this moment.
I realize that the discussion here is mostly about the technical merits of Crysis 2, but just look at the amazing art direction of that top screenshot.
In-game, you just run through that area - you don't even engage in battle there. That area was provided for atmosphere alone. See those photograpgphs over to the left - remind you of anything. Yup, that's right out of 9/11. And look at the garbage bags, and the ambulances, and all the e-vac signage - that communicates to me that there was some kind of biological cleanup taking place. The burned out tank suggests that something went horrible wrong there, but it happened a while ago, and now everyone is just gone.
When you run through that area there's all sorts of debris floating in the air, and the shadows from the trees dance slowly on the asphalt - it's not as static as it appears in the screenshot. You move through that area in about twenty seconds, and can't help but wonder what the hell is up ahead. That's purely about creating atmosphere.
Man, if that doesn't excite you then you must have ice water flowing through your veins!
ok and here's what it looked like without custom content / mods
http://static.pici.se/pictures/uQNvefbtT.jpg
http://www.gamersglobal.com/media/special/crysis/crysis_tanks_veryhigh.jpg
http://spidy.yoyo.free.fr/crysis1_veryhigh-tweak_noAA.jpg
fuckin sweet