Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah it's strangely well kept and quiet.
They should sell a dual-GPU Titan X at $750 to terminate AMD. They need to cut prices in order to deliver a lethal blow. Then, after AMD is taken care of, they would be able to set prices higher.
I doubt it would be much worse than it is today. Competition from AMD is basically non-existant as far as Nvidia is concerned.I don't know if you're joking or not, but for Nvidia to "terminate" AMD with a move like that will have lasting and severe repercussions for everyone in this subforum.
It's not even a joke - competition is required or we're all fucked and a lot of you don't seem to realize this.
I don't know if you're joking or not, but for Nvidia to "terminate" AMD with a move like that will have lasting and severe repercussions for everyone in this subforum.
It's not even a joke - competition is required or we're all fucked and a lot of you don't seem to realize this.
I doubt it would be much worse than it is today. Competition from AMD is basically non-existant as far as Nvidia is concerned.
It's not even a joke - competition is required or we're all fucked and a lot of you don't seem to realize this.
I doubt it would be much worse than it is today. Competition from AMD is basically non-existant as far as Nvidia is concerned.
Since 2012, AMD has under-cut Nvidia once (290/290X vs 770/780).LoL... There's your answer Avalon. No competition needed apparently.
Since 2012, AMD has under-cut Nvidia once (290/290X vs 770/780).
Nvidia did it at least 3 times this generation; the 680 (vs 7970), 970 (vs 290X), and 980 Ti (vs Fury X)
If anything you should be thanking Nvidia for keeping AMD in check. And it makes perfect sense, doesn't it? Nvidia has way more financial wiggle room.
It's hard to say exactly how AMD's demise would play out in the market, but I think their lack of competitiveness is definitely a factor in the way that higher-tier cards do not drop in price over time as significantly as they once did.
Zarathustra[H];1041925665 said:So, if the NDA expired yesterday, anyone know what it was?
Only at the high end. The 390 is arguably a better purchase than the 970 and the 390X is comparable to the 980. The Fury lineup was underwhelming but it's at least competitive, compared to how AMD lines up against Intel with CPUs.I doubt it would be much worse than it is today. Competition from AMD is basically non-existant as far as Nvidia is concerned.
Dual Fury has been announced and already shown a few times. The only unknown is the release date.Dual Maxwell will be announced when Dual Maxwell is announced and not a moment before. That, or Jen-Hsun is just waiting on confirmation that AMD is about to announce a dual Fury. That's when he'll beat em to the punch with GTX990.
Competition only matters if it impacts sales.Only at the high end. The 390 is arguably a better purchase than the 970 and the 390X is comparable to the 980. The Fury lineup was underwhelming but it's at least competitive, compared to how AMD lines up against Intel with CPUs.
Competition only matters if it impacts sales.
How are 390's selling compared to 970's? On Amazon, I see 6 separate models of 970s outselling the #1 390 (MSI). There are 3 models of 980 Tis above it, too.
The 390 performs about the same as a 970 while using 100W+ more and having less features.
I can't imagine anyone picking a 390 over 970.
There's a lot of misinformation from both sides, a lot more than usual from AMD these days... But that was a good post, aside from the Nvidia slang word he kept using. Just be glad the AMD community is fighting back instead of rolling over.I do enjoy how many AMD fans talk like that. I'm starting to wonder if they are just Xbox fans trolling PC forums.
What features is it missing exactly? I have a 980 Ti and a 290 in different machines. For all practical purposes they do the same things.The 390 performs about the same as a 970 while using 100W+ more and having less features.
I can't imagine anyone picking a 390 over 970.
We've been having this discussion since 2007 or 2008.One thing that bothers me about this forum is that everyone looks at the 980 Ti beating the Fury X soundly and extrapolates that down the entire AMD product stack, which is not true. The 380, 390 and 390X are great products and perform very well, typically on par or better than the NVIDIA equivalent for less money, at the trade off of higher power consumption and heat.
I have a 285 in my HTPC that runs great at 1080P, I am playing Project CARS on my 65" TV with most settings at Ultra and MSAA on, perfectly smooth. My 290 in my girlfriend's PC runs games pretty well at 2560x1440, perfectly playable for her. Is my 980 Ti faster? Yes, obviously, but it was $650. For the money AMD makes good products.
I think the Fiji boards are overpriced and I was disappointed with how they launched the 300 series, both the marketing and the repurposing of Hawaii instead of a new GPU, but at the end of day most GPU sales are <$300 products and AMD does pretty well there.
I do enjoy how many AMD fans talk like that. I'm starting to wonder if they are just Xbox fans trolling PC forums.
CrossFire doesn't work in windowed mode?
The 390 performs about the same as a 970 while using 100W+ more and having less features.
I can't imagine anyone picking a 390 over 970.
Me, Although I am satisfied with my G1 GTX 970
Assuming the price is true, it must be dual GPU gm200. Nothing else could be that expensive.Mysterious Graphics Chip from Nvidia, the JM601 GPU, Spotted in Shipping Manifest on Zauba
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-graphics-chip-jm-601-gpu-spotted/
Vaguest thing I've ever seen, but better than nothing to speculate on.
Mysterious Graphics Chip from Nvidia, the JM601 GPU, Spotted in Shipping Manifest on Zauba
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-graphics-chip-jm-601-gpu-spotted/
Vaguest thing I've ever seen, but better than nothing to speculate on.