Intel Chipset Design Error!!!

Discussion in 'Motherboards' started by bezant, Jan 31, 2011.

  1. celeron300

    celeron300 Gawd

    Messages:
    514
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Pioneers always take the arrows.... Very sloppy for Intel though.
     
  2. Katalysis

    Katalysis [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,813
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Any word on whether the esata ports are f'd as well? I would assume they are.
     
  3. 123Lanoix

    123Lanoix 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,778
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    does the bug affect all ports or just the SATA 2 ports?

    because i have not had any issues with my 2 SSDs on the SATA3 ports
     
  4. AQ_OC

    AQ_OC 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,131
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Well, I'm not 100% sure which mobos have what...but the one on anandtech site in the article about this topic doesn't appear to:

    [​IMG]
     
  5. nflavour

    nflavour n00b

    Messages:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    according to FiXT from HWC, only the SATA 3Gb/s are affected and not the SATA 6Gb/s. Thank god!
    http://www.hardware canucks.com/forum/press-releases-tech-news/40373-design-flaw-intel-6-series-chipset-halts-manufacturing-recalls-imminent-2.html#post480342
     
  6. Dev1ant

    Dev1ant Gawd

    Messages:
    646
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    P8P67 = Asus boards. That's a stock Intel board. Only the GB UD7 has an extra 2 SATA ports. All Asus ATX boards seem to have the 2 ports using the Marvel as well. MSI GD65 has it but I'm not sure if any other MSI boards do.
     
  7. Rational Egoist

    Rational Egoist [H]Lite

    Messages:
    65
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    My MSI P67A-GD65 has 4 SATA III ports. I don't plan on using the SATA II ports so I probably won't go through the RMA process.
     
  8. chrnochime

    chrnochime Gawd

    Messages:
    558
    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    It's odd that over at anandtech they call this a "statistical error" instead of a design error, even though it's quite obvious that the change of metal layer(design change) does completely solve the problem. If it was a statistical problem that IIRC cannot be completely solved, changing the design would not have made a difference.
     
  9. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,316
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    OMG what a bunch of weenies whining about a statistcal fault lol.....thought y'all were hardcore......lol
     
  10. Hostile

    Hostile Gawd

    Messages:
    687
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Christ so much dramatic crap in this thread. :rolleyes:

    Believe it or not, it's not the end of the world. Your SB motherboard is not going to kill your dog, rape your mother and then take a shit on your bed...
     
  11. Filter

    Filter [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,347
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2001
    i think they dont want to end up like Microsoft did with the red ring of death. I think alot of corporations learned from that mistake.
     
  12. AQ_OC

    AQ_OC 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,131
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    I can understand not wanting to going through the RMA...but I'd like to have the option of using All of the ports on my mobo...this is basically a mobo swap...a definite pain in the butt, though. But I was planning to over to a new case later anyway.
     
  13. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,316
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    they caught it early in production, they halted shipments, they setup a fund to take care of any potential problems, what else do people want?

    crap happens and intel is dealing with it.........if a board has a problem, just rma it and wait for a new one, i am sure a few days without a computer won't kill anyone.
     
  14. Hapatingjaky

    Hapatingjaky [H]Lite

    Messages:
    71
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    My plans for afterwork today were to go pickup an Asus Sabertooth P67, 2600K and two kits of Corsair Vengance for 16GB Memory. Not happening anymore, will be saving my monies. May its a sign to wait for X68 later this year.
     
  15. sweloop64

    sweloop64 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    202
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2009
    rumors say that the issue was not caught in-house at Intel but at an OEM...
     
  16. g-money

    g-money Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    259
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    I'm not particularly worried, it seems pretty clear that while performance might degrade on the SATA II's, it won't actually harm/corrupt your HDD or data. I've got 4 SATA III ports so i should be ok. I did notice though when I built the system that my OS HDD wasn't recognized by the SATA III controlled right off the bat.

    Will I RMA later if given the option? Probably.
     
  17. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,316
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    newegg just pulled all of their P/H 6 series boards
     
  18. Bladestar

    Bladestar Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    225
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    How do we know it completely solves the problem ? Sure, they *think* that is the cause, but until they get back working silicon, *and* test it, nobody is sure.

    So they knew about this for a few weeks (months?) and then about a week ago they confirmed it.

    The question is, is a ~3 week delay enough time to retest the chip to make sure that the new change don't cause side effects in other parts of the chip.
    That means, that this could be drawn out into June/July or longer depending on how well they test it this time, it would NOT be fun if they have a back-2-back recall.
     
  19. sPaNkThEmOnKeY

    sPaNkThEmOnKeY n00b

    Messages:
    27
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    So is the temporary solution to move my SSD and other hard drives to the SATA 6GB connections?

    I hope RMA = a new replacement board and not a 'fixed' board that someone else has returned.
     
  20. seamusmc

    seamusmc [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    I think most manufacturers use another chipset for estata.
     
  21. Old Hippie

    Old Hippie [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,013
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    QFT!

    On top of the new MB/chipset introduction which always creates confusion, now you have another cause for the builder to RMA a MB.

    If I were a "Gary Key" type, I'd be self medicating with heavy doses of narcotics and alcohol.

    I've always found it works well....problems or not. :D
     
  22. WorldExclusive

    WorldExclusive [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,866
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Yeah, they already offered me a full refund.
     
  23. Mize

    Mize Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    134
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    I *use* five SATA devices on my Sabertooth P67 Asus so the 4x SATA3 won't cut it. As a result I just picked up a Highpoint 620 PCI-E x1 SATA3 card with two more connectors. The hassle of a recall would be too much unless they do cross-ship replacements.
     
  24. Chimel

    Chimel Gawd

    Messages:
    981
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Actually according to Anandtech who got it from Intel, the performance degradation is caused by a high number of errors. It is these errors that cause the controllers to try resending the same data again and again, resulting in the performance degradation.
    So there is a high risk of data corruption.
     
  25. seamusmc

    seamusmc [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    They duplicated the bug a week ago, they did not understand the cause. Duplicating the issue is the first step in troubleshooting, not the conclusion. It took them a couple days to figure out the cause and then some more time to come up with possible solutions.

    Unfortunately for everyone they determined that only a replacement would suffice. I think its obvious they don't want to lose a billion dollars over this. Considering the ramifications, I think they got through the problem relatively quickly. I think the OEMs wish Intel had notified them first and given them at least 24 hours to come up with a support/rma story.
     
  26. ir0nw0lf

    ir0nw0lf [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,286
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Does that honestly matter? Intel already said the chipsets passed their standard testing procedures in-house and were deemed the chipsets worthy. The complete randomness of the issue was brought to their attention and they finally were able to reproduce the issue.

    Sounds like an issue that could have easily happened to any manufacturer. I'm sure someone will B&M over Intel's testing/validation procedures and say they didn't do enough.
     
  27. night_2004

    night_2004 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,209
    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    The question was posted a few pages back, but it was noted in Anandtech's article that a metal layer change was necessary in the silicon. That means that more likely than not this affects 100% of all SB chipsets and not just a batch's worth.
     
  28. 4LC4PON3

    4LC4PON3 DERP!

    Messages:
    4,225
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    If this is just a Motherboard Issue why did Newegg Deactivate all the Sandy Bridge CPU's?
     
  29. dnottis

    dnottis [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,768
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2001
    They arent... and the P67s are still for sale at newegg.
     
  30. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,316
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    ^because there are no mainboards to go with them?
     
  31. Mize

    Mize Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    134
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    the Egg on 2600k:
    Mize: [gulp]
     
  32. 4LC4PON3

    4LC4PON3 DERP!

    Messages:
    4,225
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    I can understand that but I would of still ordered my cpu but I do see your point now
     
  33. lgestle

    lgestle [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,664
    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Looks like Amazon is starting to pull all the sandy motherboards for sale.
     
  34. YeuEmMaiMai

    YeuEmMaiMai [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,316
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    try adding one to your cart
     
  35. Stereodude

    Stereodude 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,285
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2000
    I think some of the people in this thread are delusional. :rolleyes:
     
  36. 4LC4PON3

    4LC4PON3 DERP!

    Messages:
    4,225
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Newegg pulled all the motherboards i had a biostar 1155 in my cart & its now gone completely off the site.
     
  37. seamusmc

    seamusmc [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Try adding a mobo to your cart: You may see a message like: "...has been removed from shopping cart due to quantity limitation/insufficient stock. Some combo items might be affected by this."

    Navigating the product pages for these mobos is also screwed up.
     
  38. Katalysis

    Katalysis [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,813
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    When did they do that? They won't respond to my email, and I'd like to just stop the shipment on my 2500k and mobo.
     
  39. Genghis Kahn

    Genghis Kahn n00b

    Messages:
    3
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Not the smoothest of statements, but it sums it up none the less.

    I see more systems shipping with the Marvell controller being used as it is. And, most folks who think themselves serious computer users are using a 3rd party card anyways. The story isn't as sensational as the EMO kind would like. Just let them over react and get it out of their system.
     
  40. notarat

    notarat [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,697
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    With all SATA ports currently used on my board, the potential loss of half of them is not acceptable.

    I'll be initiating an RMA from Tiger tonight. Then I'll go back to using the C2Quad until April/May.