- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Messages
- 4,660
Not sure why anyone would want a 1440 monitor in 2017... Or spend a fortune for one
So what should we buy then? A huge 4k TV instead? Then I can say to you, I'm not sure why anyone would want a 60hz monitor in 2017.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure why anyone would want a 1440 monitor in 2017... Or spend a fortune for one
Then I can say to you, I'm not sure why anyone would want a 60hz monitor in 2017.![]()
Because OLED. Main issues with 2017 OLEDs are price and size.
Blusbusters said that gsync actually adds 2-3ms of lag, but is more than compensated by better image flow. One can not assume gsync will have more or less lag than Freesync or nosync beforehand:
Already have an OLED tv. Its honestly not a substitute for one of these ultra wides. It offers a completely different gaming experience. My two displays right now are the Dell S2417DG and LG 65B6P. I'm looking at these ultrawide 34x14 100hz gsync to somewhat bridge the gap between those 2. Its not as fast and smooth as the Dell and doesnt offer image quality as good as the LG, but I consider it a solid middle ground.
Vega. What displays have you tried?
Vega. What displays have you tried?
Over the last few years:
HP Omen 35, LG OLED55C6P, LG 55EG9600 OLED, Acer XB270HU, Acer Predator XB271HU, Acer Predator X34, Acer Z35, ASUS VG248QE, ASUS PG279Q, Asus PG348Q, BenQ XL2720G, Dell S2716DG, ACER XB321HK, Dell UP2715K 5K, BenQ (XL2730), BenQ (XL2735), EIZO FORIS FS2735, ASUS PQ321Q, Dell S2417DG. I think that is most.
he forgot to mention triple FW900s and triple Catleaps- the last one remarkable as one of the few times where Vega gave up on a display setup because there was not enough graphics power in the word to drive it.![]()
Yep, I was just updating my post after reading a bit. The last gsync display I used wasn't this bad though.Also posted this on OC.net:
All G-Sync displays will flicker in some loading/menu screens that drop to low FPS (by design). This is a side affect of the G-Sync chip and transitioning in and out of G-Sync mode at low FPS.
There should be no flicker in normal gaming above 30 FPS or on the desktop.
Also posted this on OC.net:
All G-Sync displays will flicker in some loading/menu screens that drop to low FPS (by design). This is a side affect of the G-Sync chip and transitioning in and out of G-Sync mode at low FPS.
There should be no flicker in normal gaming above 30 FPS or on the desktop.
I just grabbed the Predator X34...noticed the Omen 35. Any thoughts between the two?
Omen is down to like 987 today.. small increase over AOC! Amazon has changed the price a good deal. I think it was 1080->1299->987.
https://www.amazon.com/OMEN-HP-35-i...7-b4d4-466b-8c26-2639359664eb&pf_rd_i=desktop
Seems a good price relative to other ultrawides with gsync --- but ultrawide in general still seems way overpriced compared to other LCDs form factors.
Wouldn't surprise me if Agon got the panels that HP refused for their Omen 35. HP's a big player. Agon, in comparison, is relatively no name.Still a good $80 above the competing Agon 35
with exactly the same specs. And i believe the Agon stand has better looks and functionality
Wouldn't surprise me if Agon got the panels that HP refused for their Omen 35. HP's a big player. Agon, in comparison, is relatively no name.
No wayif by agon you meant AOC, i would be surprised if HP ever sold more gaming monitors than AOC. if anyone can called a small player in the gaming dispakly market, it would be HP.
To me it looks like the Omen does better in the Ufo Test
X35
https://www.limscave.de/media/hpomenx35/ufo.jpg
Agon
https://pcmonitors.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AG352UCG-blur.png
I've been in touch w/ HP about a replacement without flickering problems (mine really is quite bad). They've told me they have no units available to send, so the recall must be real.
Offered me a refund instead, I'll probably take it.