[...] Nvidia is doing it purely to please investors, as he said.
Well, that is their job, after all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[...] Nvidia is doing it purely to please investors, as he said.
If the GTX 580 performs 20% and uses 20% less TDP then the 480 it would put its perf/mm and heat/mm about on par with Cypress. Unless you think AMD has gone BACKWARDS on these figures (hint - they havent) it will not "dare I say, consume less power, cause less noise, and generate less heat" while outperforming it. No need for an open mind, just a sane one.
Current rumors put the cards at a draw in performance, all that is left is optimizing the drivers for performance, something nvidia is known for more than AMD, yet everyone is assuming that the 6970 will outperform 580. What happens if it doesn't? Granted it may be a paper launch, but everything is just rumors at this point.
The 6970 rumors have come crashing down as well. Both of the cards look less stellar at this point. I know 6970 beating a GTX 580 is the popular rumor, but I'm keeping an open mind. After all I plan to buy the better one, however fanboys should be losing sleep, GTX 580 might actually outperform 6970 and dare I say, consume less power, cause less noise, and generate less heat
BTW not saying your a fanboy
If the GTX 580 performs 20% and uses 20% less TDP then the 480 it would put its perf/mm and heat/mm about on par with Cypress. Unless you think AMD has gone BACKWARDS on these figures (hint - they havent) it will not "dare I say, consume less power, cause less noise, and generate less heat" while outperforming it. No need for an open mind, just a sane one.
It's not that simple. Cayman seems to be a huge chip but it is still appreciably smaller than GF100. We don't know very much about GF110 yet but a even if a draw in performance may give nvidia some pause it will be a pyrrhus win if GF110 is of similar size as Gf100.
BTW. I know that Cayman is expected by many to beat GTX 480. I have not seen many be convinced that GTX580 will be easily beat though. I don't know where you've seen that. There are no real comparisons leaked between the two cards.
Regardless of whether he hates Nvidia or not hes not wrong. 20% faster 480 is not likely to beat the 6970, and if they dont launch in large numbers Nvidia is doing it purely to please investors, as he said.
More solid rumors tonight, this time from: VRzone, sources: pconline.com.cn, enet.com.cn
I think you posted wrong link.
Here's the one you refer to in your post:
http://vr-zone.com/articles/report-...includes-128-tmu-benchmarks-leaked/10202.html
Alarming Thought: Is Nvidia pushing forward the GTX 580 launch because they know that the 6970 will beat it in performance? So rather than releasing a slower part later, they want to beat AMD to the punch before it is fully revealed how much faster the 6970 is? Hmmmmm.
It will come out after the 6970 after all.
It makes no sense to buy the 580 on launch, unless you're loyal to the Nvidia brand.
Well it could make sense for someone who wanted to secure a card for them selves before it potentially sells out and becomes available again. Availability could be an issue with this card at first...
Alarming Thought: Is Nvidia pushing forward the GTX 580 launch because they know that the 6970 will beat it in performance? So rather than releasing a slower part later, they want to beat AMD to the punch before it is fully revealed how much faster the 6970 is? Hmmmmm.
why is that alarming? a price war will only serve us. but (and I hate to say this) I think Charlie is right about the early launch. its not so much to do with the competition as the stockholders. if Nvidia is really soft launching this then they are not going to see any sales from doing this really. so I think it probably is something along those lines.
The problem is whether this card will be available on "launch" date.
Either way, what's the rush?
is google broken? you could have your answer in 10 seconds you know. anyway, the gf100 has a possible 512 cores and 64 tmus but the gtx480 has 480 cores and 60 tmus.Wait...if 580 has 128 TMUs (rumor) then how many does GTX 480 have ?
is google broken? you could have your answer in 10 seconds you know. anyway, the gf100 has a possible 512 cores and 64 tmus but the gtx480 has 480 cores and 60 tmus.
well a good site for future reference is www.gpureview.com.Google sometimes fails me because it auto picks the latest related links which turned out to be a spam of GTX 580 rumor links about 128 TMUs.
lots of sites saying 499
chinese sites say 599
eh
tru that
but yeah nvidia apparently going to have mass quantity on 11/8 and suppose to shipping them out for reviews soon.......
tru that
but yeah nvidia apparently going to have mass quantity on 11/8 and suppose to shipping them out for reviews soon.......
i also have a feeling that Nvidia's AIB partners are feeling a bit of push and tug from Nvidia. Look at MSI they just got their Lightning 480GTX done (H's review was just recently put up) only to have all that time and effort and $$ swept under the rug by the 580. That tells me Nvidia just kindof sprung the 580 on them in the last little bit, i bet some AIBs aren't happy with Nvidia not being more transparent in with their plans.
I'm glad to see both ATI and Nvidia trying to one up each other again. It can only mean good things for us.
This exactly
I think we are looking at the prequels to a long and furious war towards and beyond 28nm!
6990 is going to be a serious threat to 580..
... Or, perhaps, i could say it IS what i expected and more .. a lot more