![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
LOL so much stupid in this post.
Notice throughout the graph there are ups and downs. Ocean level is always changing. Sea Level Rise is the change over time -- d(t). Place a red line from the beginning of that graph following the mean of the measurements and it is increasing.
Just to help you out:
If the future trend follows the trend of the last three years then the red line will have to bend and start to go down. If you plot it back far enough in time and use only a straight line the red line will either be increasing, flat, or decreasing, depending on the time range. Also the big question, what are the units of the Y axis? 0-80 what, degrees C, degrees F, degrees K, fat people, skinny people, dumb posters per thread... graph is meaningless without proper units. Any real scientist( physicist, chemist, ect) can tell you the numbers put out to confirm global warming really don't tell anything for certain. I have even seen assumptions put forth by some climatologists the defy the laws of physics lol. One of the graphs that most climatologists use to show how CO2 causes rising temperatures actually shows that temperatures began to rise decades before CO2 levels did, but they still point to the graph and say that if both are rising then CO2 must have caused the warming, but how does rising CO2 levels cause temperature to increase decades before it began to rise? Physics tells you that if sea water temperature rises, which is caused by rising global temperatures, then it can not contain as much CO2 dissolved in it, therefore it will release it into the atmosphere, which is why rising temperatures cause rising CO2 levels, not the other way around.
The Earth will die a fiery death when the sun expands, but the universe will die a dark frozen death once all the matter has been pulled into massive black holes that will slowly dissipate over eons.
