That make any downside from AI worth it, I think it could be better than the original acting on the Stiller part (or at least they are more uniform for both performance versus the really over the top choice vs more normal).
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Steves vindictiveness is frightening. I mean he's got the qualifications for a serial killer lol. Once he smells blood he goes for the kill like a shark. All over that one comment from the LTT tour? Sheesh.The everything. Genius on all fronts. If Steve casually wore an Owen Wilson wig in his next video and never made mention of it, people would be blacking out from laughter-induced oxygen deprivation.
But that'd also be undermining Steve's dead serious conviction about the whole thing, thus he'd never do it.
Because the $100,000,000 corporation and undisputed dominant force in the world of tech based video content with multiple channels, outlets, custom built state of the art laboratory testing facility, it's very own international annual expo and that's been proven to lack any kind of moral compass isn't Goliath in this scenario.And when it's pointed out, it's punching down?
Without trying to soapbox this, Ian is wrong about it because the whole "error on page A1, correction on A37 a week later" is a well-known to *bury* the correction so nobody sees it.proof it doesn't work as Ian believes.
But it's not. He said in his video it's been building for a while.All over that one comment from the LTT tour?
Not gonna argue your claim about where he's wedged, but "that Ian guy" is fairly well-known, too. Dr. Ian Cutress was a senior editor at Anandtech for over a decade.That Ian guy is wedged so far up Linus's ass
Ian is legit and his video was mostly on point.Not gonna argue your claim about where he's wedged, but "that Ian guy" is fairly well-known, too. Dr. Ian Cutress was a senior editor at Anandtech for over a decade.
TBH, ltt has to be called out on their bad testing, but until recently they were in their own lane of "tech reviews you don't take too seriously". When they decided earlier this year to be taken seriously and then took pot shots of reviewers who have been working years on accurate data, they painted a target on their own back.
A 100m dollar company announced publicly that they where coming for him and planning to replace him... cause he can't afford to run brand new tests every review.Steves vindictiveness is frightening. I mean he's got the qualifications for a serial killer lol. Once he smells blood he goes for the kill like a shark. All over that one comment from the LTT tour? Sheesh.
If you come at the King, you best not miss.Steves vindictiveness is frightening. I mean he's got the qualifications for a serial killer lol. Once he smells blood he goes for the kill like a shark. All over that one comment from the LTT tour? Sheesh.
I prefer reviews from fellow true geeks who perhaps even nerd out a bit more then myself. People willing to work long hours themselves testing because they love it... and perhaps hiring a small team that feels likewise. (cause hey one man show is a bit crazy). LMG got to big for its britches. And ya he is a terrible terrible manager... the guy made his own wife the head of HR. LMAO If as he claims an outsourced consultation firm said that was cool... he either hired someone very unqualified or he ignored them on that. Imagine... "I have an issue with the company... hey bosses wife can you help me here" Geezus
Conflict of interest so over the place. If the sexual harassment casse ends up in court hell be eaten alive.I prefer reviews from fellow true geeks who perhaps even nerd out a bit more then myself. People willing to work long hours themselves testing because they love it... and perhaps hiring a small team that feels likewise. (cause hey one man show is a bit crazy). LMG got to big for its britches. And ya he is a terrible terrible manager... the guy made his own wife the head of HR. LMAO If as he claims an outsourced consultation firm said that was cool... he either hired someone very unqualified or he ignored them on that. Imagine... "I have an issue with the company... hey bosses wife can you help me here" Geezus
He will be. I know most people on the [H] are American. As a Canadian let me say Linus is going to get some serious finger slapping. I assume it will go to the BC human rights commission... and they will be forced to hire a proper HR person, probably develop proper policies and hire real consulting companies to do it, and very likely get hit with a ton of fines/payouts. If any other employees come forward, it will get very expensive.Conflict of interest so over the place. If the sexual harassment casse ends up in court hell be eaten alive.
The "drive to build an authoritative review behemoth" is pretty absurd.
Bottom line is we don't need a 100m+ Media company giving us "authoritative" reviews or product shootouts ect ect.
I think his problem is that he still wants to be the face of the channel still. Certain personality types can only take a company so far. Think Bill Gates or Steve Balmer. When your personality becomes bigger than the company itself that's a problem. Most companies usually move the figurehead away from making public statements if the overall public perception is negative. I'm surprised they didn't do that here. But this speaks to how much control he still has, and I'm afraid it's too much.It’s not a bad video, but if Linus really wants to build labs up like that he’s going to need to expect even more scrutiny coming at them over time. They have lofty goals, but it’s going to need a careful hand. I don’t think Linus himself is up to the task so hopefully he can keep his nose out of things and let the new CEO and the rest of the management team handle things.
I’m willing to sit back and see how things go, but I won’t be surprised if we end up getting another exposé on them down the road.
This is funny, considering I've heard Linus say essentially the same thing several times on the WAN show; he doesn't want to be the "authoritative" reviewer and encourages others to develop their own review styles and emphasizes there's plenty of room in his segment for other reviewers and tech channels. So I don't know where you're getting that quote from otherwise.Bottom line is we don't need a 100m+ Media company giving us "authoritative" reviews or product shootouts ect ect. IN fact I actively reject. (its not different then the commercial PC mag reviews back in the day... Garbage) Knowing they want to be "The authoritative" review company makes me want them to fail.
Nah, most (if not all) of the issues brought up recently were why he was still CEO. And he's still the face of LMG regardless (now as the "Chief Vision Officer"), hence his name on the name of the channel and company. He's the most appropriate person to address the issues publicly. But people are gonna shit on him and his company regardless of what he does or doesn't do as well.I think his problem is that he still wants to be the face of the channel still. Certain personality types can only take a company so far. Think Bill Gates or Steve Balmer. When your personality becomes bigger than the company itself that's a problem. Most companies usually move the figurehead away from making public statements if the overall public perception is negative. I'm surprised they didn't do that here. But this speaks to how much control he still has, and I'm afraid it's too much.
You're bringing these senior management heavy hitters and they aren't the ones who are primarily in your restructuring video? You're paying them high six figures easily. WTF.
This vid was pulled from GN's channel with it seems a lot of backlash attached to it if I am reading Twitter right.
https://twitter.com/GamersNexus/status/1695703091452969059
View attachment 594112
While I do have some pretty strong feelings about his LTT videos, not really sure about this one.
View: https://streamable.com/sw5jn6
But also includes major screw ups, then trashing said product, because they used the wrong one and their own team didnt know what GPU they even had...I listened to the WAN show this week and Linus seemed to address it pretty well; he essentially reprimanded the tech that blasted GN and Hardware Unboxed in that tech tour and apologized for it on the WAN show. But I guess GN took that as an invite to destroy him with a 45 min critique of his business and every misstep he could find in the last year or so.
The thing is if you are going to offer consumer advice you need to be authorative to the best of your abilities. "If you don't like how I do it, then do it better" is an argument for adolescents. Either do it right or don't do it at all. I don't have to do a better / more comprehensive review first to gain the right to call out bad practices. But even if that was the requirement GN surely qualifies.This is funny, considering I've heard Linus say essentially the same thing several times on the WAN show; he doesn't want to be the "authoritative" reviewer and encourages others to develop their own review styles and emphasizes there's plenty of room in his segment for other reviewers and tech channels. So I don't know where you're getting that quote from otherwise.
Disregarding the fact that the first shots were fired by LTT, I consider the GN video important consumer advice, not a pointless attack. I had no idea about their shoddy record and until now I'd have taken their results at face value, now I know better thanks to GN calling it out.Think of all the extra traffic the [H] could have had if you had spent more time attacking colleagues though. If you'd just been a smaller man you could have had so many petty vendettas.