Another fun fact, I don't play benchmarksJust say "I don't understand CPU benchmarks".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another fun fact, I don't play benchmarksJust say "I don't understand CPU benchmarks".
Another fun fact, I don't play benchmarks
Every non-replay makes your claim look false.
You could provide data like:
I play game Z at resolution X x Y @ X FPS
Or:
I run software X at Z performance.
But instead you paddle around unable to back up your claim...
Fun fact, neither him nor I game at 720p. Perhaps you do but, him and I do not.
Oh well, standard fare, to be expected to those who do not like AMD.
We know, we know- evaluating AMDs products fairly versus their competitors equates to 'not liking AMD' for The Faithful.
I'm still going to give them a fair shake and recommend them when they earn it. Or not, when they don't.
FX systems are fantastic, even to this day.
Do not like or accept that, no skin off my back
AMD is not dead
despite how many thought that would occur.
Now there are rumors of Big Navi coming and that is a positive thing
especially since custom board partners will be ready for that by that point.
Perhaps you should read the thread instead of suggesting I'm not responding to you. I'd suggest you stop trying to bring irrelevant data into this as arguments and perhaps I'd respond to your satisfaction.Every non-replay makes your claim look false.
You could provide data like:
I play game Z at resolution X x Y @ X FPS
Or:
I run software X at Z performance.
But instead you paddle around unable to back up your claim...
I'll buy fury is faster than the 580, vega 56? big fat nope.
Perhaps you should read the thread instead of suggesting I'm not responding to you. I'd suggest you stop trying to bring irrelevant data into this as arguments and perhaps I'd respond to your satisfaction.
The only time I turn on fps monitors is when something isn't butter smooth or otherwise broken.Only thing I get from your posts is that the performance is so "meh" you do not like to share it....confirming known benchmarks.
The only time I turn on fps monitors is when something isn't butter smooth or otherwise broken.
I'm not here for you. What are you even trying to prove here? I'm an idiot because I use a piledriver system and it runs games just as well as my ryzen system? Both work really well btw.
Ryzen 1600 and 580 on the left, fx8320 and 580 on the right. Performance difference in every application I use is imperceptible.Citation needed...
It's not great, but it is much better than before. I think above 90C is when you start getting worried, 80C is relatively safe.Is that good?
What is the claim here that I need to provide quantitative evidence to support?What I thought...it is very simple:
You make the claim...you have to back up the claim.
Unless we have to enter the realm of eg. "flat-earthers"....and go all in on fallcies.
Oh, sorry,I meant I really don't game much. Minecraft with the kids is about it... 1080p. I mostly do programming/development, doesn't need much GPU power. I didn't mean it like the fury was great, just meant I wasn't demanding. Although, it does pretty good on a few of the newer games I've played around with. I mean, it's still faster than an rx570 and close to 570, depending on title it can keep up with a 590. So it's considerably low end, but hey, it was great for mining and could game well too.Some might have higher demands...it's a bit of a fluffy non-description you gave.
What do you do?
720p gaming?
The devil is in the details.
No, I have a 1080 monitor and it outruns my son's 570 in most titles.. more 580 speed but depends on the game. I honestly don't game a lot though, so I'm not too concerned. I could put my gtx 470 back in and be fine, but talk about loud and hot.Depending on the title it is in fact. Regardless... if you have a fury right now, I don't see the point of upgrading unless you just bought a shiny new 4k or high refresh 1440. Anyone on 1080p high refresh or not... or older 1440 is probably just fine sitting on the fury till there are a few more options in the market.
Oh, sorry,I meant I really don't game much. Minecraft with the kids is about it... 1080p. I mostly do programming/development, doesn't need much GPU power. I didn't mean it like the fury was great, just meant I wasn't demanding. Although, it does pretty good on a few of the newer games I've played around with. I mean, it's still faster than an rx570 and close to 570, depending on title it can keep up with a 590. So it's considerably low end, but hey, it was great for mining and could game well too.
Currently, Navi10 is tearing up Nvidia and selling like hotcakes. With a rumored price reduction for blowers coming, once AIB 5700's hit. AMD doesn't want to keep making them, but instead let THEIR PARTNERS, in on all the Navi goodness.
Navi10 is only 251mm^2 and beats the much bigger Vega20 (also 7nm) chip in many games. "Big-Navi" is essentially 64 CU Navi... and would be roughly the same size as Vega20. That means Big-Navi would be 30%+ increase over Radeon XT 5700XT in games. And can manufacture these 335mm^2'ish chips much cheaper than the Mi50 chip in the Radeon 7.
Meaning, AMD can sell a Big-Navi chip with about equal the performance of the RTX2080ti, for about $599. <----
You again?
I'm eager to see the sales report that I'm sure you have that demostrates your claim. We already know the rest of your post is just plain false (ok let's call it wishful thinking ) so I won't use it against you
Steam survey will give numbers next month...those pesky facts
Steam survey will give numbers next month...those pesky facts
It will be interesting to see where it charts on steams survey over the next few months. I notice they keep going in and out of stock at the local computer shops where I am. Granted they probably aren't receiving 100s of them... but their online stock lists seem to go 10+ (the most they report at that shop) to zero and back again since they launched. I think you and NV may be be pretty shocked to see how many people put PCIE 4 5700s in their shiney new 570 boards. (which the same shop also continues to report 10+ zero 10+ zero on, at least the ones that don't cost a grand lol)
I would not trust the steam survey's, unless they automatically and without asking upload the data to their servers. I have 3 computer and have yet to see any survey questions, RX 5700, RX Vega 56 and RX 580.
Sample size is big enough...even if no one you know participate FYI.I haven't heard of to many people who have been asked about the survey. Do they ask on startup if they can collect data and use your hardware config as part of that data? It's been a while since I've had to reinstall steam.
Sample size is big enough...even if no one you know participate FYI.
Sample size on a service like this needs to be near 100% or it means nothing. Fact is, I have never been surveyed, that I can recall, and I have had Steam since it's release.
You again?
I'm eager to see the sales report that I'm sure you have that demostrates your claim. We already know the rest of your post is just plain false (ok let's call it wishful thinking ) so I won't use it against you
Lol, had AMD and Nvidia - only the Nvidia computer Steam query for survey - wonder if Nvidia gives them a dime for every GPU they show?I would not trust the steam survey's, unless they automatically and without asking upload the data to their servers. I have 3 computer and have yet to see any survey questions, RX 5700, RX Vega 56 and RX 580.
Lol, had AMD and Nvidia - only the Nvidia computer Steam query for survey - wonder if Nvidia gives them a dime for every GPU they show?
This.Steam Survey is always incorrect.
No one ever asked me anything! All surveys are meaningless!
This.
But it seems to get pulled out whenever it fits a narrative
What I thought...it is very simple:
You make the claim...you have to back up the claim.
Unless we have to enter the realm of eg. "flat-earthers"....and go all in on fallcies.
And dismissed as insubstantial when it doesn't.