thats your opinion
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
-
Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
BFBC2 Multiplayer better on PC or PS3?
- Thread starter Liquid_Cooled
- Start date
- Status
thats your opinion
.
-Did you really just call console gamers the retards of gaming?
-Competitive players on consoles outweigh PC
-What has better controls is your opinion
-I don't give a shit about dedicated servers, and i don't need them to find people to play with, that's what my friends list is for
-"Potential Graphical Settings", don't make a game fun and great, look at how bad CRYSIS was, and they don't make you suck any less.
evanisthecoastie
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 4,708
Oh my.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2005
- Messages
- 4,658
You just keep saying "that's your opinion" but you're totally side-stepping any point I make, most of which are logical.
There is a physical limitation with a controller when playing FPS games. If I'm playing something like splinter cell, dead space or a racing game I'm going to naturally choose a controller usually my 360 controller, because it is more natural and better suited to those type's of games. FPS are best experienced with a mouse and keyboard, they play alright with a controller but it's a different style of play.
I'm not sure if you've ever used a proper mouse and keyboard setup but a good mouse and a nice huge mousepad can do wonders.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2005
- Messages
- 4,658
I don't think you've even played Crysis. That PC in your sig wouldn't even come close and you're probably just rattling off what you've read else-where. There's been a ton of shit game's released in the past few years, and Crysis certainly wasn't one of them. People were just pissed they couldn't run it, think of it as the Windows Vista of the gaming world.
piscian18
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 11,020
So do 12 year olds who get banned for putting their penises online.
http://gamer.blorge.com/2010/04/25/banned-from-xbox-live-until-9999/
console = eeh
PC = less eeh
I'm not much the console vs PC war though. I just happen to enjoy pc gaming more. + eyefinity.
CrazyCuz2k
Gawd
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 684
Defending a a controller over a mouse/kb combination for an FPS is just plain retarded. 90% of the gamers on this forum have a console and a gaming comp and 99.9% of them would prefer a kb/mouse combination over a controller. I've played all series of Halo/Gears of War competitively and I'm sorry in terms of speed and accuracy, there's just no comparison. The "great" moves and headshots on the console are normal on the PC.
That and you have to factor in distance. Majority of PC gamers play 1-2 feet from their screen at high resolutions 1680X1050 or above.... whereas the average console plays on a 42-50 inch screen playing at 1280X720 at 5-7 ft. (1080P games are still far and few). You can't even compare resolutions, precision and accuracy as well as framerates. Than you put in input lag from a wireless controller vs a high speed USB. Most Consoles are capped at 60 fps if not 30 FPS whereas most high end PC's get FPS well over 100.
All technical things aside... just from experience playing on both platforms extensively back to teh days of the atari 2600 and 386 days.... really trying to compare precision and speed on a PC (kb/mouse) and console (controller) is plain assnine and ignorant. You may be more comfortable with it but let me play against a console gamer and me on my PC and I'll be licking me chops.
That and you have to factor in distance. Majority of PC gamers play 1-2 feet from their screen at high resolutions 1680X1050 or above.... whereas the average console plays on a 42-50 inch screen playing at 1280X720 at 5-7 ft. (1080P games are still far and few). You can't even compare resolutions, precision and accuracy as well as framerates. Than you put in input lag from a wireless controller vs a high speed USB. Most Consoles are capped at 60 fps if not 30 FPS whereas most high end PC's get FPS well over 100.
All technical things aside... just from experience playing on both platforms extensively back to teh days of the atari 2600 and 386 days.... really trying to compare precision and speed on a PC (kb/mouse) and console (controller) is plain assnine and ignorant. You may be more comfortable with it but let me play against a console gamer and me on my PC and I'll be licking me chops.
and again, it is not a fact and is your opinion...
i guess you don't know what a friend is...
My Ass...
- you can pretty much cheat out anyone when your playing pc with high viewing angles and extrawide screens, which doesn't make you good.
- i don't play 5-7 feet away from my 52" screen its more like 1-2.
- you won't be able to see 100 fps anyway.
yea those twelve year olds will beat your ass in any game
You dare us? I'd love to see how much e-balls you have if you weren't challenging PC gamers in a game where the entire control system was set up to gimp them so that the 360 players wouldn't get trounced.
Breath_of_the_Dying
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,454
A wise man one said...
Never argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level then beat you with experience
Barring PC vs Console fanboy BS aside, the best advice would be to go where your friends are at. All my friends have BC2 on PC, so I got it on PC. All my friends got RDR on the 360, so I'm probably going to get it on 360. My friends all have borderlands on PC, guess which system I got it on.
Never argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level then beat you with experience
Barring PC vs Console fanboy BS aside, the best advice would be to go where your friends are at. All my friends have BC2 on PC, so I got it on PC. All my friends got RDR on the 360, so I'm probably going to get it on 360. My friends all have borderlands on PC, guess which system I got it on.
this.
From wikipedia:
Because of the lack of 'pixel-accuracy' with the Xbox 360 analog thumbstick, the designers have included an aim-assisting technology, which basically interpolates the player's movement and causes the reticle to stay over an enemy player like a weak magnet. In addition, FASA has implemented a feature which causes the cross-hair to expand during quick movements, thus lowering the player's accuracy, making it impossible to quickly turn and maintain accuracy, reducing the potential advantage of playing with a mouse.[7][8] PC players, who have a more sensitive control scheme, are able to turn significantly faster than their controller-using counterparts and would have gained an unfair advantage.
I fixed that for you. Can't miss the small print, imo.
I'm not sure why th OP never mentioned where his friends play.
Who the hell dares people in video games challenges over a message board? I feel like I took the vernacular time machine back to the 1990's.
It IS a fact that you keep using the "opinion" argument
LeninGHOLA
Vladimir Hayt
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2009
- Messages
- 18,416
x10000000000
wikipedia is full of lies anyway...
definitely is
yea, it was crap on both sides
If I owned a pre-made crap PC and couldn't afford anything better I'd be arguing for consoles also- it'd probably cathartic. <EDIT: this is my opinion.
Does that mean we got served?
Does that mean we got served?
mmmm, better make sure Eurogamer and IGN aren't lying too.
Does that mean we got served?
Maybe going back to the 90's isn't so bad after all.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2005
- Messages
- 4,658
100FPS isn't neccesarily about what you see, and I'm not even gonna get into that argument with you. It's about the feel. Any competitive pc player will be able to tell you the difference that a high/stable FPS makes. Everything feel's smoother, every looks smoother (animations) and in some instances like Q3/CoD/CoD2 there's added benefits of having 125fps.
Cool, so you sat down on your friends machine, walked around a little bit maybe killed a couple of guys and than passed judgement on the game as a whole. Sweet~
How old are you?
The guy's who play Halo are skilled, I'll admit that, but the person who said that those amazing shot's you see in Halo are a common place amongst PC gamer's is spot on. Halo is probably the closest thing that the console's have to a competitive game and the reason it works so well is because it was built from the ground up to be played on 360. MLG makes Bungie a ton of money, so there's all kind's of things competitive friendly built into the game, and there's also a reason why every MLG Pro uses a wired controller, aside from interferance reasons.
Jesus Christ, go back to the gamespot forums it's where you belong.
Last edited:
anonmoniker
Gawd
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 718
I can't speak for what he was saying, but I'll step up to the plate myself:
Console gamers are the retards of gaming.
Nothing wrong with the consoles themselves, particularly if you're poor and can't afford a nice PC. Although I think even among poor people, gaming on a console is a sign of laziness and/or stupidity. A high end PC will cost less than a console over time if you play a lot. The typical new release PC game is $20-$30 on ebay whereas the typical new release console game goes for $40-$55. Then you also get raped on accessories with a console, Xbox live fees, and probably have to buy more than one Xbox because they're so unreliable. Keeping a high end dual gpu PC + games costs less than a Xbox 360 + games, so there's little reason to choose the vastly more expensive and inferior experience. The people who are prone to making this mistake are also prone to doing other stupid things like spending $3 on a Street Fighter character skin. So yes, console gamers tend to be the retards of gaming, mostly through self selection.
CrazyCuz2k
Gawd
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 684
Yes, that begs the question. My bet is 15-16.
That would be me
I second that motion.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2005
- Messages
- 4,658
Give me a 15" 4:5 monitor, a ball mouse and some speakers and I'd still bet $100 I'd whip the shit out of you. In fact I could probably gauruntee it.
When I'm running my xbox out of a little standard def TV and whipping the shit out of the kid with some sweet turtle beach headset playing off a 42" TV what's the excuse gonna be?
THERES NO BALANCE IN CONSOLE GAMING, wAH!!!!!
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2004
- Messages
- 9,100
turtle beach is shit, your better off getting a monster surround system, a 40"+ HDTV doesn't cost much these days.
why would i spend a ton of money on something i can get for just $300, and i don't buy any DLC since it is a waste of money like you are hinting, hey if xbox live didn't have fees it would end up like the PlaystationNetwork.
evanisthecoastie
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 4,708
MeRcInAtOr16
what about it
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 7,268
Remember, don't feed the trolls people.
Clay is obviously an XBox 360 fanboy with his arguments that console gaming is better than PC gaming holding about as much water as a rusted through bucket.
Seeing your ignorance on my screen makes my blood boil, but you're just trying to start shit, so I'm not going to waste my time debating the merits of a modern PC over a console with 5+ year old tech since clearly you aren't going to listen to the facts. So instead of wasting everyone's time why don't you go outside, get some fresh air, and go play at the local playground with the other kiddies, eh?
We all know here at [H] that capable gaming PCs are the obvious choice and the premier platform, so you aren't fooling anyone with your rhetoric fanboy drivel.
In the end, I digress, it's all about the games.
Clay is obviously an XBox 360 fanboy with his arguments that console gaming is better than PC gaming holding about as much water as a rusted through bucket.
Seeing your ignorance on my screen makes my blood boil, but you're just trying to start shit, so I'm not going to waste my time debating the merits of a modern PC over a console with 5+ year old tech since clearly you aren't going to listen to the facts. So instead of wasting everyone's time why don't you go outside, get some fresh air, and go play at the local playground with the other kiddies, eh?
We all know here at [H] that capable gaming PCs are the obvious choice and the premier platform, so you aren't fooling anyone with your rhetoric fanboy drivel.
In the end, I digress, it's all about the games.
Last edited:
I'm no fanboy, I have everything from top of the line gaming PC to the Wii, but I happen to also HATE playing a video game sitting at desk after I get home from work were I sit at a desk all day. Also think the keyboard and mouse is antiquated and like having a game were all of my controls are simplified in a few easy to reach buttons.
Of course you are going to have more accuracy with a mouse and keyboard; but have you ever thought that it takes more skill to be good with the thumbsticks, which is why most of you "can't stand it". I went through the pain of the transition and now I enjoy playing any game more on my couch in from of my 55' television? Your on a level playing field for the most part so you can't get an advantage from the equipment you spend hundreds on.
Ummm...you would love halo if you like unrealistic shit.
NEWS FLASH...when most people play a video game they are being lazy, the last thing they want to do is sit at a desk leaned over a keyboard and mouse...they also aren't going to look at the screen so they can see how detailed Gordan Freeman's nut sack is. You also underestimate the sheer technical knowledge that is needed to be a PC gamer and work through the problems associated with it, and don't start the "Its easy crap". Its easy for you and 99% of the posters on this board, that is why we are here. It may cost less but it is way more of a pain in the ass than buying a console and playing.
Of course you are going to have more accuracy with a mouse and keyboard; but have you ever thought that it takes more skill to be good with the thumbsticks, which is why most of you "can't stand it". I went through the pain of the transition and now I enjoy playing any game more on my couch in from of my 55' television? Your on a level playing field for the most part so you can't get an advantage from the equipment you spend hundreds on.
Ummm...you would love halo if you like unrealistic shit.
NEWS FLASH...when most people play a video game they are being lazy, the last thing they want to do is sit at a desk leaned over a keyboard and mouse...they also aren't going to look at the screen so they can see how detailed Gordan Freeman's nut sack is. You also underestimate the sheer technical knowledge that is needed to be a PC gamer and work through the problems associated with it, and don't start the "Its easy crap". Its easy for you and 99% of the posters on this board, that is why we are here. It may cost less but it is way more of a pain in the ass than buying a console and playing.
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2004
- Messages
- 9,100
Sweet! Abusive trolls are bannable trolls.
LeninGHOLA
Vladimir Hayt
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2009
- Messages
- 18,416
Hi 2 U. Buy an HDMI cable
Damnit, was about to feed the troll.... but IT WAS FEELING REALLY GOOD! doh!
Tell that to THE ENTIRE country of South Korea. You would start a nuclear war if you took PCs and StarCraft away from them.
PCs for life, PCs forever! Dont tread on me.
Tell that to THE ENTIRE country of South Korea. You would start a nuclear war if you took PCs and StarCraft away from them.
PCs for life, PCs forever! Dont tread on me.
Sweet! Abusive trolls are bannable trolls.
fongul!
- Status