AMD Threadripper Socket TR4 Up Close and Personal

FrgMstr

FrgMstr

Just Plain Mean
Staff member
Joined
May 18, 1997
Messages
56,617
So after our adventures with destroying the socket on our Gigabyte Aorus Gaming 7, I thought I would try to get some good pictures of the TR4 socket to show you just how jam-packed the socket is with all of its 4,096 pins. This is a full resolution image, 4000x3000, optimized to 2.1MB.

Picture on the news page.

Also worth mentioning again, as some folks do not seem to get my message. I did not damage the TR4 socket while installing the Threadripper CPU, that process was excellent in my opinion and shows how much thought and design went into its production. I damaged the TR4 pins when reinstalling the cover that protects the pins during shipment and install. This was totally my fault and none of the socket's design or implementation. However, all that does not negate the fact that these TR4 pins are incredibly delicate. So again, my message is to give warning to our readers that will be handling these processors.
 
As an Amazon Associate, HardForum may earn from qualifying purchases.
Kyle, in your opinion is it difficult to reinstall the protective cover? In case someone wanted to re-sell a mobo. Or would it be easier to just reinstall the clear plastic cassette and forgo the cover?
 
It looks like getting any kind of grip on that cover is the problem, if there would of been some pull tab on top to firmly grab it, it would solve the issue.
 
I understand why they did it that way, but it underscores just how badly we need a new mounting method in the industry. Optical interconnects or something. I know you messed up, you admit you did and the motherboard maker has nothing to do with it. It's AMD's standard. But that really is kind of lunacy on pin count and square inches.

We've had good luck since the industry started to put the pins on the motherboards. None of us knew how that would work out in the beginning. It stopped the rampant pin damage on expensive CPUs. And mostly in enthusiast situations the motherboard is a less expensive item to destroy than the CPU.

But that socket is so large only people who trust themselves, have steady hands and know PC builds inside out should be screwing with that socket at all. (You certainly do, and an accident still happened) Even small debris contaminates in the pin area are an issue with that thing. You really wouldn't want to leave that pad exposed for very long. It's like a Murphy's Law Magnet. There's no way he can resist causing everything to go wrong. :p
 
Riccochet said:
Kyle, in your opinion is it difficult to reinstall the protective cover? In case someone wanted to re-sell a mobo. Or would it be easier to just reinstall the clear plastic cassette and forgo the cover?
Click to expand...
No, it is not difficult, I just fat-fingered it, but I hardly "jammed" it down onto the pins either. You just needed to touch and have them snag something. Did this twice. Again, DO NOT TOUCH the pins at all.
 
1tl8nf.jpg
1tl27x.jpg

1tl8nf
 
Last edited:
Contest to give away the damaged board for someone to try in desperation to get the pins straightened?
 
Nathan_P said:
I thought this was [H]ardForum? Put the damn board out of its misery with the 50 cal:D
Click to expand...
Hehe, sadly this boards are hardly thowaways in terms of cost. It is on its way back to Gigabyte.
 
How many hours have I spent using a Mechanical pencil or an exact-o knife fixing CPU pins....

socket7/370 a mechanical pencil is the best method. although an exacto or razer is easiest to get them into rows.

Pusher of Buttons said:
Contest to give away the damaged board for someone to try in desperation to get the pins straightened?
Click to expand...
I would be game....
 
Wolfie said:
How many hours have I spent using a Mechanical pencil or an exact-o knife fixing CPU pins....

socket7/370 a mechanical pencil is the best method. although an exacto or razer is easiest to get them into rows.


I would be game....
Click to expand...

I've never wrecked pins I couldn't repair on a PGA but LGA I've scrapped a few
 
Advil said:
I understand why they did it that way, but it underscores just how badly we need a new mounting method in the industry. Optical interconnects or something
Click to expand...

So many of those pins are for ram. Switching ram from parallel to serial would reduce pin count, but increase latency; regardless of optical or not. Unless you're going to somehow multiplex everything into a small number of optical interconnects, it's going to be extra fiddly too. An alternative, probably terrible way to avoid all these pins, would be a pluggable 'cpu module' with cpu soldered on to a board with the ram slots, and then PCI-E and power to the motherboard.
 
Advil said:
I understand why they did it that way, but it underscores just how badly we need a new mounting method in the industry. Optical interconnects or something. I know you messed up, you admit you did and the motherboard maker has nothing to do with it. It's AMD's standard. But that really is kind of lunacy on pin count and square inches.

We've had good luck since the industry started to put the pins on the motherboards. None of us knew how that would work out in the beginning. It stopped the rampant pin damage on expensive CPUs. And mostly in enthusiast situations the motherboard is a less expensive item to destroy than the CPU.

But that socket is so large only people who trust themselves, have steady hands and know PC builds inside out should be screwing with that socket at all. (You certainly do, and an accident still happened) Even small debris contaminates in the pin area are an issue with that thing. You really wouldn't want to leave that pad exposed for very long. It's like a Murphy's Law Magnet. There's no way he can resist causing everything to go wrong. :p
Click to expand...

Intel LGA "pins" you can push down all you want. They seem pretty good better than pins on a cpu.
 
I have to admit that Kyle is an friggin hero for making these mistakes. Think of the boards saved when we get ours because he was the great sacrifice and let us know just how much caution we need. I plan to install my 1950x once and only once and if I sell it that will be the only time I remove it.
 
I installed an AMD CPU a few months ago and somehow bent a pin. I got out my Exacto knife and mechanical pencil to straighten the pins. Couldn't believe I did it - I thought I was being careful. The CPU powered up and has been running solid since my repair work. (I also had to get my reading glasses out to see the damn pins - I wouldn't want to try to do this with smaller pins. My eyes aren't that good (and shakey hands don't help)
 
toast0 said:
So many of those pins are for ram. Switching ram from parallel to serial would reduce pin count, but increase latency; regardless of optical or not. Unless you're going to somehow multiplex everything into a small number of optical interconnects, it's going to be extra fiddly too. An alternative, probably terrible way to avoid all these pins, would be a pluggable 'cpu module' with cpu soldered on to a board with the ram slots, and then PCI-E and power to the motherboard.
Click to expand...

How come Skylake X only has 2066 pins? It also has quad-channel memory support and up to 18 cores. It has slightly fewer PCI-E lanes but could that account for a difference of nearly 2000 pins?
 
[H]ardocp could make some good posters with hires pictures like this.
 
Last edited:
Whatever you do keep q-tips away from sockets, they will get snagged and bend pins like a motherfucker...or so I heard from a friend.
 
JimmiG said:
How come Skylake X only has 2066 pins? It also has quad-channel memory support and up to 18 cores. It has slightly fewer PCI-E lanes but could that account for a difference of nearly 2000 pins?
Click to expand...
64 pcie lanes is a shit ton and there is alot of electrical connectivity to make them interface the CPU.

Also consider that the sp3 socket is a server socket where there are two more functional dies that give the Epyc 32 cores. There is many many pins that support the two other dies. Amd didnt want to make another socket for these as Threadripper is essentially either a failed Epyc or a Twin Ryzen in an Epyc frame. Im sure well know for sure in future.

Im.seriously hoping they are failed epycs that we can unlock more cores on. Id love a 20 or 24 core CPU hah
 
Last edited:
Those cpu's are frigging huge. Did they just find a new purpose for some old Pentium pros? :D

I see the return of the secc a thing.
 
Can we please get a pic of the damaged part?
Would be good to see exactly how the pins are bent because it hard to tell exactly what the geography of the pins are from the pic of the good socket.
 
tangoseal said:
64 pcie lanes is a shit ton and there is alot of electrical connectivity to make them interface the CPU.

Also consider that the sp3 socket is a server socket where there are two more functional dies that give the Epyc 32 cores. There is many many pins that support the two other dies. Amd didnt want to make another socket for these as Threadripper is essentially either a failed Epyc or a Twin Ryzen in an Epyc frame. Im sure well know for sure in future.

Im.seriously hoping they are failed epycs that we can unlock more cores on. Id love a 20 or 24 core CPU hah
Click to expand...
Would there be FAILED Epyc chips though? Wouldn't they already know if a die (8core) is fail before putting on the interposer?
 
JustReason said:
Would there be FAILED Epyc chips though? Wouldn't they already know if a die (8core) is fail before putting on the interposer?
Click to expand...
Besides what Dr8Baeur unconvered I am not sure we know much at all about these chips (yet).

Yes they should and would. To my understanding there are 4 dies under there. Now AMD is "claiming" they are none but spacers under there but I smell something else. I smell two failed or one failed die of the 4 total. They didn't make the cut as 32 core Epycs. I have no idea though and I do not know a large amount about processor fabrication.

There is something about them that AMD wanted hidden as they requested Dr8, or however you spell his gaming name, take them down immediately off his site.

As far as the interposer, well that depends if they ran all the "wires" so to say. If they didnt run wires to the other two dies then there is no physical way to enable cores like past chips. But if wires are run then that is where my knowledge doesn't continue. If these are not failed epycs then why use the same exact socket etc.... for these Threadripper chips? Seems to me AMD had quite a few that didn't make the cut so they are like hrmmmm Threadripper. Just a hunch, again, probably wrong as I am with everything in life.
 
Last edited:
Meh.10 MG of Diazepam, very good lighting, and quality magnification can have her back in fighting shape in a couple hours. I just worked this trick on a 1150 board I wrecked some pins on when I first built my signature rig. Diazepam reduces the natural twitching and shaking you get doing things requiring very fine motor control such as messing with tiny ass #$@^&*% pins. My father mentioned using it for the very same purposes when he was a sniper, though only for range use or competitions. The tiniest movement when firing a rifle can turn into a much larger deviation at 1,000+ yards :D , much like a tiny twitch can send your tool of choice wrecking into pins you never meant to touch as well.
 
Dont feel bad Kyle. Been doing this awhile too and after 20 years dropped a x5680 directly, corner down, on the 1366 socket. Mashed 6 pins to shit. Even though I was drinking at the time I still didnt have steady enough hands and fat fingered it as well.

Took 1 hour and she booted up though, unlike this. That socket seems insane.. Board looks amazing though!

Looking forward to the reviews and thanks for the PSA.
 
erexx said:
Can we please get a pic of the damaged part?
Would be good to see exactly how the pins are bent because it hard to tell exactly what the geography of the pins are from the pic of the good socket.
Click to expand...
Sorry, board is gone, back to GBT.
 
I don't think I'm the only one that has ripped a ryzen cpu out of the socket when removing the hsf. I really like the idea of a more secure mechanism to hold down the cpu. Fact is, Intel has done this for generations. Glad amd is following, but hope it makes it down to the desktop level not just hedt.
 
mnewxcv said:
I don't think I'm the only one that has ripped a ryzen cpu out of the socket when removing the hsf. I really like the idea of a more secure mechanism to hold down the cpu. Fact is, Intel has done this for generations. Glad amd is following, but hope it makes it down to the desktop level not just hedt.
Click to expand...
You would be correct sir.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top