AMD Threadripper is a 16-Core 32 Thread Monster [Rumor]

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by cageymaru, Mar 29, 2017.

  1. cageymaru

    cageymaru [H]ard|News

    Messages:
    19,266
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Turkish tech website Donanimhaber (translator needed) has leaked some new rumors about the specifications of the upcoming AMD Threadripper 16-core / 32 thread processors. While the upcoming 32-core Naples family is destined for servers, the new 12-core and 16-core AMD Threadripper line is for end users. AMD has developed the 16-core Ryzen processors for end users by combining the MCM (Multi-Chip Module) or the 8-core dual processor core in the same module. Of course the 12-core variant will have one core per CCX disabled. This lineup is meant to rival the Intel Core i7-6950X.

    There is a four-channel memory controller on tap so that these processors can better compete with Intel's best. We already covered the X390 and X399 chipsets here that AMD Threadripper processors will run on. Currently AMD is expecting these processors to have a 140W TDP for the 12-core and a 180W TDP for the 16-core. 64 PCIe lanes will be available and the lineup sports a 32MB Level 3 memory cache. These processors are going to use the B2 revision of the Ryzen core which fixes errata and the current engineering samples are running at 3.2GHz / 3.4GHz with a 3.7GHz turbo. AMD expects to increase this to a 3.6GHz base with a 4.0GHz turbo by launch. The Cinebench score is around 2500 points.

    The author of the article expects to see more information on these at Computex and a release of June or July assuming that everything stays on schedule. This leak sounds like AMD is about to unleash the Kraken on Intel. I can't wait to see some workstations showcased on [H]ardocp with these new Threadripper processors in them. Of course this is all rumor, so don't jump on the hype train just yet. The thought of competition in the CPU space is always wonderful news.

    According to Elime, the launch of Threadripper Ryzen processors with 16 cores and 32 tracks will be done during the Computex Fair and will be sold in late June or July, possibly in the following period. Of course, I would like to remind you that AMD has the right to make changes in the launch date and sales schedule without notice because of the early stage information. The price issue is unclear for now, but I know AMD has different scenarios on which to work, but the most powerful processor with 16 cores will cost a bit more than twice the size of the Ryzen 1800X.
     
    Xinmosni likes this.
  2. spaceman

    spaceman [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,727
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Nice. Good to see amd continuing this trend of useful products. Let's hope it continues on the GPU side too.
     
    griff30 likes this.
  3. Doward

    Doward [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,541
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    X399 + 32Core Naples in ITX, plz.

    I kid, but then again, I'd lay down the money for that.... lol
     
  4. LurkerLito

    LurkerLito 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,106
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    I am sure I would want one especially if it can do 3.6 base 4.0 boost and actually run a full RAM slots at the actual ram speed rating. I'd already have bought a Ryzen chip if not for that ram speed issue when all slots are filled.
     
    N4CR likes this.
  5. ir0nw0lf

    ir0nw0lf [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,258
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Threadripper? :wacky:
     
    B2BigAl, cageymaru and griff30 like this.
  6. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,440
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Another week, another awesome AMD announcement. Nice!
     
    Xinmosni likes this.
  7. ole-m

    ole-m Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    406
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2015
  8. griff30

    griff30 I Lower the Boom!

    Messages:
    5,310
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2000
    Threadripper?

    Am I the only one that thinks this CPU needs penicillin as a thermal paste?

    All kidding aside, I hope this is REAL and faster than what is here now.
     
  9. Burticus

    Burticus 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,790
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Threadripper sounds kind of derpy. How about.... CoreJizzer
     
  10. Ducman69

    Ducman69 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,445
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Better, but doesn't emphasize how its a big group of cores.

    How about "Bukacore"? 16 cores all standing around your app ready to unleash at once.
     
    naib, {NG}Fidel, spikeline and 9 others like this.
  11. griff30

    griff30 I Lower the Boom!

    Messages:
    5,310
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2000
    ..That would be Bukkacore.
    Add the extra "k" for reference understood. ;)
     
  12. ir0nw0lf

    ir0nw0lf [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,258
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Threadripper sounds like what happens to me after some bad food. :whistle:
     
    Chimpee, Xinmosni, tunatime and 2 others like this.
  13. alxlwson

    alxlwson You Know Where I Live

    Messages:
    5,672
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    dscf4964.jpg

    At least it's from Snap-On
     
  14. Burticus

    Burticus 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,790
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    I see what you did there. Yes.... all 16 cores ready to "unload" 32 threads to completion

    (12 year old me giggles)
     
    naib and alxlwson like this.
  15. JosiahBradley

    JosiahBradley [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,712
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    16 cores at 4Ghz would be too much power!!! O_O
     
    {NG}Fidel likes this.
  16. Burticus

    Burticus 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,790
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    NEVER! I need MAX ThreadRipping CoreJizzing Bukacore power to play my old backlog of Steam games. :)
     
    lostinseganet, N4CR and KazeoHin like this.
  17. Ducman69

    Ducman69 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,445
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
  18. gxp500

    gxp500 Gawd

    Messages:
    867
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2015
    If amd is just stuffing a pair of r7 dies onto a substrate how can intel compete with this? They're building huge 8/10 core dies with probably low yields, seems like a win win situation for amd.
     
  19. grtitan

    grtitan Telemetry is Spying on ME!

    Messages:
    1,266
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Even if they did, I would still buy a Ryzen.

    Honestly, I'm just waiting of a CPU revision which will allow an OC higher than 4 GHZ.
     
    naib likes this.
  20. tweaked

    tweaked n00b

    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    This is the first time AMD had gotten my attention in 15 years. I'm always telling people I'm not an Intel fan boy, yet i always bought Intel.

    Thanks AMD for giving me a real choice.
     
    naib, Burticus and N4CR like this.
  21. KazeoHin

    KazeoHin [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,766
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Oh god my sides...









    Maybe call it "GangRip"?
     
    {NG}Fidel, TheHobbyist and Ducman69 like this.
  22. Dr. Righteous

    Dr. Righteous 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,095
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Yeah, I keep reading Thread Dripper for some reason.
    Goofy is right.
    Man, I can come up with a cool name.............
    Multiple threads............ Tapestry
     
    griff30 likes this.
  23. Teenyman45

    Teenyman45 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,258
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    I've said it before in this forum and I'll say it again; The odds of an unlocked multiplier are... ?
     
  24. jkw

    jkw Gawd

    Messages:
    607
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2004
    [H]ardcore
    Coregasm
    Threadbanger
     
    Burticus and whateverer like this.
  25. tesfaye

    tesfaye 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,419
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2003
    Yeah yeah yeah, 16 cores, 32 threads, buuuut, what's up with that hair in the video?
     
  26. cageymaru

    cageymaru [H]ard|News

    Messages:
    19,266
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    It's a Turkish thing. You wouldn't understand.

    Ha ha ha ha!
     
  27. D4rkn3ss

    D4rkn3ss 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,594
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
  28. oldmanbal

    oldmanbal [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,037
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    when these make it to the 150-250$ price range in 3-5 years we will have a winner.
     
  29. Gigus Fire

    Gigus Fire 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,275
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    hmm, i haven't been paying close attention to this. Has there been any release dates?
    Any price rumors yet?
     
  30. britjh22

    britjh22 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    381
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    So how many payments is it to the Snap-On truck guy to get that beauty.
     
  31. Stimpy88

    Stimpy88 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,273
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Shit Intel are in trouble...

    I'm waiting for the B2 rev Ryzens to come out first, then I'm going AMD, first time in nearly 14 years.
     
  32. Snowdog

    Snowdog Pasty Nerd with Poor Cardio

    Messages:
    8,291
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    I wonder how Multi-Chip modules work with no separate North Bridge and Memory Controller. Since the Mem Controller is independent in each chip in the module, do you have to populate memory for each chip in the module.

    So you end up with something more like 2 indepenedent CPUs with 16GB each, instead of one monster core with 32GB?

    Does anyone understand how this works?
     
  33. thingi

    thingi [H]Lite

    Messages:
    97
    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    This is a CPU that's begging me to buy it to replace my current unRaid Server rig (3770S/24Gb ram) with Virtual Machines with GPU Passthrough (nVidia 1070 for Windows and 750ti for OSX).

    Wallet open, just need it to be released to market.... and proper IOMMU compatibility to be fixed in Linux (or maybe via an UEFI update) - Ryzen can't do it at the mo' :(
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2017
  34. drescherjm

    drescherjm [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,219
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    I assume it is the same as dual processor systems (and above) today. Google NUMA.

    All modules should see the same memory pool but have different latency to RAM depending on if the RAM is directly connected to the module or not.
     
    thingi likes this.
  35. thingi

    thingi [H]Lite

    Messages:
    97
    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Good question, I'd like to know too, but with KVM I can separate the pools with zero performance impact due to using VM's with GPU passthru.
     
  36. Ducman69

    Ducman69 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,445
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Too far! The line is way over there... :p
     
    lostinseganet likes this.
  37. drescherjm

    drescherjm [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,219
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    I doubt that will happen. It assumes that IPC and / or frequency will increase significantly in 3 to 5 years. I expect to see AMD hitting the same wall Intel has been up against for years after Ryzen+ is released.
     
  38. Snowdog

    Snowdog Pasty Nerd with Poor Cardio

    Messages:
    8,291
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    I get the theory, I just wonder about the mechanism for sharing data when it is in memory attached to a different memory die. I assume for AMD it is hypertransport? What is the performance hit on that?

    In many ways it reminds me of SLI/CF, you can end up with effectively half the usable memory, because it is really separate pools attached to different chip, and you end up with a lot of duplication.

    While you do have access to it through some mechanism, it seems like it would not only be slow, but it would slow down the processor hosting that memory when you use it's memory controller to give access to another chip.
     
  39. TheHobbyist

    TheHobbyist Hugs Hard Johnnies [H]ard

    Messages:
    456
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    I took it as he was referring to used prices in 3-5 years. I could be wrong, but look at used Xeon prices.
     
  40. TheHobbyist

    TheHobbyist Hugs Hard Johnnies [H]ard

    Messages:
    456
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Also, BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Ty Thread.