• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

AMD Fury Overclocking vs nVidia

Amazing? for a liquid cooled card?

Now this is amazing

The MSI GTX 980 Ti LIGHTNING’s boost clock was 1404MHz after overclocking, which increased to 1518MHz. It’s memory was slightly higher at 8.1GHz
Click to expand...

at least is so much better than the 100mhz it did before.
 
Fury is the air cooled card. ~15-20% OC on the Fury is pretty good. You have to remember the 980ti boosts to around 1200 out of the box, so it should be looked at in % vs %.
 
Here's one of my Titan X's at 1487 MHz: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/9331050 Some of the guys with the 980 Ti's like the Amp Extreme! w/custom vbios probably hit 1600 MHz and should get even higher scores than me.

Edit: Compare score for those interested: http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/6104547/fs/6521300 Keep in mind the system w/the Fury got a boost w/that 5960x, his overall + physics would be lower if he had the same processor as me.
 
Last edited:
A 200Mhz overclock is still pretty damn good. The 900-series is exceptional, but that hasn't always been the case.
 
Does OP know that those 1200+ furies are hard-modded for more voltage and likely under sub-zero cooling?
 
plexx said:
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6104547

Using Sapphire TriXX people are getting amazing overclock results on AMD fury cards.

Can someone post their VALID 980ti max OC single GPU results? im interested in comparing.
Click to expand...

Useless without knowing how it was overclocked. Can I buy a Fury off the shelf and achieve similar results on air or CLC, or does it require a huge investment in subzero cooling?
 
LigTasm said:
Does OP know that those 1200+ furies are hard-modded for more voltage and likely under sub-zero cooling?
Click to expand...

No... Those got up to around 1450 IIRC.

Looks like the sapphire tool and maybe afterburner is allowing voltage and HBM ocing finally. These are OCs on a normal card. Now there's a reason for Brent to do a OC vs OC review. Well not really because we know how it'd turn out, but at least the AMD cards have a decent OC now. :)
 
Remon said:
Sorry, didn't read ligtasms whole post, I thought you were talking about newer results on air.
Click to expand...

:) Just a forum! Hah.

I am glad to see AMD unlocking the cards. Still not quite as good as Maxwell but at least they should be in the ball park OC vs OC.
 
Dayaks said:
:) Just a forum! Hah.

I am glad to see AMD unlocking the cards. Still not quite as good as Maxwell but at least they should be in the ball park OC vs OC.
Click to expand...

The Fury X is really quite competitive at 4k. The shite AMD driver team is the problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top