GTX Titan (final specs and bench)?

Status
Not open for further replies.
First clear flat pic of the rear of the card...
gtxtitanapcw01.jpg
 
Someone who would know said:
You know what's great? Watching one of these wipe the floor with an Ares 2

No need to take my word for it though, benchmarks will be out soon

Mmmhmmmm...
 
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/b1417/ASUS_GTX_Titan.html
Code:
GPU Clock:       915 MHz
Boost Clock:    1019.5 MHz 
Memory Clock:   1502 MHz 6008 MHz effective

Hmmmmm....... still going with TPU as being most reliable out of the current info, but we'll see soon enough. It wasn't updated long ago.

EDIT: NDA drop purportedly at 9am EST.

Gives me a full 12 hours to play Crysis 3 before I'm distracted by reviews. Glad I'm taking Monday off.
 
Gives me a full 12 hours to play Crysis 3 before I'm distracted by reviews. Glad I'm taking Monday off.

Ahhh, didn't realize Crysis 3 was already coming out :eek: . Some reviewers are hinting there may be something other than Titan coming too :confused:.

HardwareCanucks Reviewer said:
I can't really be specific but don't listen to rumors.

Once articles are posted, if there are any, I'm sure Facebook, Twitter and enthusiast forums across the net will light up like bonfires with NVIDIA and AMD fans engaging in their usual hissy fits. What basically means: you'll hear about the launch...even if you're fast asleep.

In response to hissy fits:
HardwareCanucks Reviewer said:
Because what I really wanted to say was edited by the forum:

"S&^t flinging contests"
 
Last edited:
Hmmmmm....... still going with TPU as being most reliable out of the current info, but we'll see soon enough. It wasn't updated long ago.

I think TPU listed the 690 clocks that were listed on some Australian seller's site for Titan.
 
<------is praying the card isnt voltage locked like the 600 series :/
 
I think i might wait 4-6 months for these,,, you know the drivers are going to suck for surround setups
and the price will be right by then
 
I think i might wait 4-6 months for these,,, you know the drivers are going to suck for surround setups
and the price will be right by then

There won't be any after the first 2 weeks....
 
I think i might wait 4-6 months for these,,, you know the drivers are going to suck for surround setups
and the price will be right by then

Don't see why the drivers are going to suck since its still a 6xx series part.
 
I need one of these bad for 3d studio max and maya. cuda stuff... this is a cheep geforece tesla. cant buy it anywhere.
 
Sounds like not too much info today, maybe some specs and pictures and that might be it, rumor is they pushed back the paper launch.
 
I need one of these bad for 3d studio max and maya. cuda stuff... this is a cheep geforece tesla. cant buy it anywhere.

You can get the Tesla K20 on Newegg for $3500. I'm not sure if you can use a Tesla card for those applications, though. (If you can, you'd need a separate card to output the video, sort of like the old 3dfx Voodoo cards) Also, if you can use a Tesla in Maya, it will be significantly faster than a Titan, because of the special drivers Nvidia makes for their professional cards.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E1681413200
 
$3000 is to much for me to spend on a tesla.


800 to $1000 on a titan not that big of deal and yes tesla works like a quadtro in sli we have one in the studio.

Was saying i cant buy the titan I have been waiting for it to show up somewhere so I can pre order it.
 
One hour, and fifteen minutes. If I didn't have this terrible cold, I'd be reaching for the coffee around now.
 
What happens at 9am, reviewers have said not much happens today, maybe Nvidia releases confirmed specs and more pictures not much more
 
Just did some quick interpolation with me measuring stick (assuming perfect scaling, which at this resolution it can be near):


TitanComparo.jpg



Look's like in BF3, Skyrim, Borderlands 2, Batman the 60-85% scaling rumors of a single Titan versus a 690 are true. In Crysis 3, Max Payne 3, Far Cry 3, a single Titan beats a 690 handily. What worries me though is the 3960X is only at 3.3 GHz. But then again, with this resolution and 4x AA, the CPU shouldn't be the limiting factor. Not to mention if it was a CPU limit, the 3x Titan setup would get limited just as much as the 2x 690 setup.

A 2x Titan setup beating a 2x 690 setup 3 out of seven times is pretty good!

I just wonder how PCI-E 3.0 will hold up with four Titan's all at 8x slots. :D
 
Look's like Titan does better at higher resolutions than lower.
 
6Gb VRam. Ya think?

The quantity of VRAM has nothing to do with the chips performance. Only when a VRAM limit is reach would it affect anything. The Titan would run at the exact same speed with 3GB of VRAM as it does with 6 GB.
 
Just did some quick interpolation with me measuring stick (assuming perfect scaling, which at this resolution it can be near):


TitanComparo.jpg



Look's like in BF3, Skyrim, Borderlands 2, Batman the 60-85% scaling rumors of a single Titan versus a 690 are true. In Crysis 3, Max Payne 3, Far Cry 3, a single Titan beats a 690 handily. What worries me though is the 3960X is only at 3.3 GHz. But then again, with this resolution and 4x AA, the CPU shouldn't be the limiting factor. Not to mention if it was a CPU limit, the 3x Titan setup would get limited just as much as the 2x 690 setup.

A 2x Titan setup beating a 2x 690 setup 3 out of seven times is pretty good!

I just wonder how PCI-E 3.0 will hold up with four Titan's all at 8x slots. :D

A CPU bottleneck doesn't have to be complete, it can be relative as well. Meaning card A could be 40% faster than card B, but due to the CPU it is only 20%.
 
Do you really need to have the relationship between VRam and performance at higher resolutions explained to you?

Oh yes, I, need VRAM performance at high resolutions explained by You. You know the day starts off good when you have a great laugh!
 
what do either of you have to gain by continuing this ridiculous argument? back on topic please :)
 
Stating that a card will be a great high resolution performer simply by stating that it has 6GB of VRAM is demonstrably false.

Those generalized statements are all yours. It's obviously not the only factor at play, but large amounts of VRam obviously do have an impact on performance at high resolutions. If you weren't so busy tripping over your own ego you would at least acknowledge that.
 
So, two 670's in SLI like I've planned? Or buy into this Titan fuckery and wait a bit.
 
It's amazing how worked up you can get simply because I made the connection between Titan's 6Gb VRam and it's performance at high resolutions. Do you seriously believe that these things aren't related? :confused:

no lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top