GoldenTiger
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2004
- Messages
- 29,670
First clear flat pic of the rear of the card...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone who would know said:You know what's great? Watching one of these wipe the floor with an Ares 2
No need to take my word for it though, benchmarks will be out soon
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/b1417/ASUS_GTX_Titan.html
Code:GPU Clock: 915 MHz Boost Clock: 1019.5 MHz Memory Clock: 1502 MHz 6008 MHz effective
Hmmmmm....... still going with TPU as being most reliable out of the current info, but we'll see soon enough. It wasn't updated long ago.
EDIT: NDA drop purportedly at 9am EST.
Gives me a full 12 hours to play Crysis 3 before I'm distracted by reviews. Glad I'm taking Monday off.
HardwareCanucks Reviewer said:I can't really be specific but don't listen to rumors.
Once articles are posted, if there are any, I'm sure Facebook, Twitter and enthusiast forums across the net will light up like bonfires with NVIDIA and AMD fans engaging in their usual hissy fits. What basically means: you'll hear about the launch...even if you're fast asleep.
HardwareCanucks Reviewer said:Because what I really wanted to say was edited by the forum:
"S&^t flinging contests"
Hmmmmm....... still going with TPU as being most reliable out of the current info, but we'll see soon enough. It wasn't updated long ago.
are we there yet?
<------is praying the card isnt voltage locked like the 600 series :/
you know it will be, lol
I think i might wait 4-6 months for these,,, you know the drivers are going to suck for surround setups
and the price will be right by then
I think i might wait 4-6 months for these,,, you know the drivers are going to suck for surround setups
and the price will be right by then
I need one of these bad for 3d studio max and maya. cuda stuff... this is a cheep geforece tesla. cant buy it anywhere.
Here is a link to a PREDICTION on performance. http://www.ocaholic.ch/xoops/html/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=955&page=0
Look's like Titan does better at higher resolutions than lower.
6Gb VRam. Ya think?
*chart snip
Just did some quick interpolation with me measuring stick (assuming perfect scaling, which at this resolution it can be near):
Look's like in BF3, Skyrim, Borderlands 2, Batman the 60-85% scaling rumors of a single Titan versus a 690 are true. In Crysis 3, Max Payne 3, Far Cry 3, a single Titan beats a 690 handily. What worries me though is the 3960X is only at 3.3 GHz. But then again, with this resolution and 4x AA, the CPU shouldn't be the limiting factor. Not to mention if it was a CPU limit, the 3x Titan setup would get limited just as much as the 2x 690 setup.
A 2x Titan setup beating a 2x 690 setup 3 out of seven times is pretty good!
I just wonder how PCI-E 3.0 will hold up with four Titan's all at 8x slots.
The quantity of VRAM has nothing to do with the chips performance.
Do you really need to have the relationship between VRam and performance at higher resolutions explained to you?
Stating that a card will be a great high resolution performer simply by stating that it has 6GB of VRAM is demonstrably false.
It's amazing how worked up you can get simply because I made the connection between Titan's 6Gb VRam and it's performance at high resolutions. Do you seriously believe that these things aren't related?
So, two 670's in SLI like I've planned? Or buy into this Titan fuckery and wait a bit.