Why doesn't he compare overclock for overclock? A 8350 at near 5ghz scores almost 30% faster than his 1090t in multithreaded cinebench. http://www.techhum.com/amd-showcase-fx-8350-at-5ghz-near-idf/That would be the most fair comparison. But when you have an agenda you skew the results to...
What benchmarks? These from some random Chinese guy nobody knows? Also please provide some proof on power consumption for Vishera since you seem to know it's power consumption when overclocking.
He never mentioned measuring performance. I think he's saying benchmarks aren't everything. For example SSD's. There are multiple different ones, you can't run tons of benchmarks to see which one is the absolute fastest, but you probably couldn't tell a difference between most of them. I got...
So if a chip were 10% lower in IPC but could clock 50% higher at the same power usage that wouldn't be "looking good"? Not saying Trinity can, but just because something has a low IPC does not make it look bad. Just like a high IPC high that can't clock high is bad.
"In a move than could very well be interpreted as exchanging one problem for another, Advanced Micro Devices has decided to stop focusing so much on the PC business and get its act closer together on the mobile front. "
This thread needs retitled. It does not say AMD is getting out of CPU's...
Wouldn't say sucks. It's pretty even with there previous processor. Was it what they were promising, no. Can it get there, yes. Do I need to jump off a bridge because OMG FAILDOZER, IT'Z SO HO33IBLE, no.