Armenius
Extremely [H]
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2014
- Messages
- 42,160
Will release sometime this fall. No word on whether this will still be an Epic exclusive yet, or if multiplayer will be supported.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The first game is supposed to run pretty well after all the patches. Hopefully they take what they learned with that release and apply it to the other two games without needing to wait.I hope they optimise the performance in the second and third game because the 1st game is very poorly optimised, just like the original and so far I wasn't impressed by it.
Even the original release of Crysis 2 ran better than the first game.
I liked the actual games of 2 and 3 more than the first one, even if they dropped a lot of the graphical zaniness of the first game. Not sure I'm in a hurry to replay them, though. The zany graphics and semi-open world added a little bit of replay to the first game. At least the first half of it. The 2nd and 3rd games were linear shooters. That's is a one-and-done for me, even if it's a good game.
I disagree. I had the most fun I've ever had in the first game when I did another playthrough a few months ago. I enjoyed Warhead, but I honestly don't think the pacing was as good.I was never able to complete Crysis 3. When it came out, or even if I installed it now on my 100% different system build. I always get a crash when you first enter the forested area within the dome, it crashes right at the checkpoint right before, I assume, you encounter the new alien enemy hunters. I really liked what I saw of Crysis 3 otherwise..
Crysis 1 is pretty awful to play now, honestly. It hasn't held up. I don't even remember Crysis 2 that much, I remember not liking it. I did think Warhead was pretty decent, and holds up better.
Wasn't there a report a couple years back that said their studio was in the red and couldn't pay staff? I think their fate was sealed a decade ago when they tried to make a move into the console market, rather than remain focused on the high end PC platform which their reputation and the reputation of their engine was built upon. Sure the high end PC market was niche but the licenses/royalties from other devs using their engine would have probably been more than enough to keep them afloat.Crytek is fully committed to cashgrabs now
I think they were damn fools not to make a true remake of the original game from the ground up on their newest engine instead of this remastered garbage that still has most of the same limitations the original game has. It was so funny for years and years and years that people kept thinking they needed to throw more hardware at it and here we are 14 years later and that piece of shit game still can't even maintain 60 FPS even with a modern $5,000 computer. Trying to remaster that old game was nothing but a waste of time and you still have to turn down settings just to keep 60 FPS from the CPU standpoint which is laughably ridiculous considering modern CPUs are orders of magnitude faster than what was available when the game originally came out.
Fully agree and this is why I haven't bought Crysis Remastered still. The biggest issue by far with the original game was that it was mostly single-threaded and this should have been priority 1 to fix on the remaster. I don't care if they would have had to port it to a new engine; it simply wasn't worth doing until they could fix the CPU/performance bottleneck first and foremost, IMO.I think they were damn fools not to make a true remake of the original game from the ground up on their newest engine instead of this remastered garbage that still has most of the same limitations the original game has. It was so funny for years and years and years that people kept thinking they needed to throw more hardware at it and here we are 14 years later and that piece of shit game still can't even maintain 60 FPS even with a modern $5,000 computer. Trying to remaster that old game was nothing but a waste of time and you still have to turn down settings just to keep 60 FPS from the CPU standpoint which is laughably ridiculous considering modern CPUs are orders of magnitude faster than what was available when the game originally came out.
Same here. It is painful to see when remasters get screwed up. The only thing I want is a graphical update and perhaps some QoL changes if necessary.Fully agree and this is why I haven't bought Crysis Remastered still. The biggest issue by far with the original game was that it was mostly single-threaded and this should have been priority 1 to fix on the remaster. I don't care if they would have had to port it to a new engine; it simply wasn't worth doing until they could fix the CPU/performance bottleneck first and foremost, IMO.
Though I can somewhat empathize with them if they're that desperate for money right now and can tell that the ROI for porting the game to a new engine likely wouldn't have been nearly as much as remastering the game in its current engine. Maybe if they make enough from this remaster trilogy and other games in the next few years, they can do a Crysis "remake" and do it right at some point, lol.
Consoles get a bundle. EGS also probably gets a bundle. I'm not seeing a bundle or the other two games on Steam, which is why I brought it up.Are they going to bundle all 3 games into a single install or is this going to be 3 separate games?
Consoles get a bundle. EGS also probably gets a bundle. I'm not seeing a bundle or the other two games on Steam, which is why I brought it up.
I'm curious what kind of enhancements Crysis 3 will have on the PC. If you crank up the details/res in the shipping version it looks great as-is. That one might mainly be for the consoles.
Even when it came out I was not the least bit impressed with it. I think it looks very dull in areas and way too many low res textures.crysis 2 looks good without remastering
If you had done a little research you would know that the game is insanely CPU limited a great deal of the time so a 3080 is not going to magically fix anything. There's a couple of settings you have to turn down that impact the CPU if you want to even get 60 FPS. Bottom line is the game is just as big as an unoptimized piece of shit in the remastered version as it was in the original version. There are games that look way better while running at twice the freaking frame rate.Crysis remastered is the only game I have returned. I bought it on an impulse to test out my 3080 back in fall but it ran like garbage so I returned it and got control instead.
I bought it in the first weeks it was out, so not many complaints yet and already said it was an impulse purchase. Thanks for the tip though.If you had done a little research you would know that the game is insanely CPU limited a great deal of the time so a 3080 is not going to magically fix anything. There's a couple of settings you have to turn down that impact the CPU if you want to even get 60 FPS. Bottom line is the game is just as big as an unoptimized piece of shit in the remastered version as it was in the original version. There are games that look way better while running at twice the freaking frame rate.
its good with dlss on 3080So how is the performance in Crysis 2 and Crysis 3 Remastered? I want to get it, but since being burnt by the poor quality of the first game I'm a bit hesistant.