Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SmackDizzle said:LOL.. you are hilarious.. Are you drunk? An articulate fool, how rare. Where did I say they had no drivers? The drivers they released do not work and they are from the first build way back when, read more and show your ass less. Grow up!
p.s. you had to google that? Did it not occur to you to simply look at creative? LOL
Snooble said:For the OP :
Try getting OS support for a Lexmark product. For any OS.
Edit : I have to tell why I said that. I called up checking on beta drivers for a printer at one point. They took all my info and gave me a ticket number. Then they sent me another printer...problem still isn't solved.
I actually had to 'hack my own' WinXP x64 drivers for my Samsung ML2010. This was AFTER it was released. Luckily there were drivers for teh ML 1740 and I was able to just 'rename' them to make them work. I believe they are on windowsupdate now...Snooble said:For the OP :
Try getting OS support for a Lexmark product. For any OS.
Edit : I have to tell why I said that. I called up checking on beta drivers for a printer at one point. They took all my info and gave me a ticket number. Then they sent me another printer...problem still isn't solved.
ClutchS said:Thank YOU SmackDizzle!!!
I do not expect miracles from any manufacturer but to everyone complaining about concerns raised of Creatives lack of ability to keep up with everyone else thay have not released a new driver since July 12!
http://us.creative.com/support/down...&driverlang=1033&OS=26&drivertype=0&x=31&y=21
And from this dl link you will see thay are fully aware of the lack of support,
why then don't they fix known issues?
is 2 months not enough time??
what will happen once Vista is out in full? I can only hope that they have it together by then. But this has not always been the case.
If people posting here about sensible concerns regarding lack of support for a given product (Creative) for any OS is a problem for you and you say give Creative more time or that we the consumer don't understand what's involved in development of drivers it's simple business sense, not magic.
Creative continues to drag their feet and alot of peole don't appreciate this fact. The members here who claim to have explicit understanding of how HARD it is to get drivers ready and how hardware companies have no responsibilities to anyone until final release of an OS you might be correct(might) OR maybe Creative should look into hiring from ATI and Nvidia development teams! LOL if this doesn' make sense to you the so called experts on how hardware companies run than I am at a loss to explain any further...
Point 1: Creative have no reason not to take advantage of tons of useful data that we the consumers can be providing them before final release of Vista simply by having adequate drivers ready to provide full functionality of the hardware, or at least an attempt at obtaining this objective.
Point 2: It is not wrong to ask questions like why are video card manufacturers able to support their hardware EVERY step of the way during OS development but not the sound card manufacturers (Creative).
And it is certainly not a false expectation of me or many of the members here who you the Creative defenders have such contempt for to expect better software from Creative.
Point 3: LAST ONE (I know Phew!) If you feel that raising these concerns is wrong why join a forum????
Someone new to computer assembly, operation reading about disappointments toward a certain manufacturer that time and time again are so slow with updated drivers may appreciate being able to make a more informed decision as to what to expect from said manufacturer before shelling out hundreds of dollars, this can not be a waste of time!
HighwayAssassins said:x-fi only doesnt work with x64. x86 works just like XP.
but creative does need to pull thier head out of their asses
your x-fi card will not work with Vista x64 (due to driver signing), but will work in Vista x86 just as well as XP x86.Dan_D said:Are you talking about Vista x64 or Windows XP Professional x64 Edition. The X-FI doesn't work with the former, and does work with the latter.
HighwayAssassins said:your x-fi card will not work with Vista x64 (due to driver signing), but will work in Vista x86 just as well as XP x86.
![]()
Dan_D said:Are you talking about Vista x64 or Windows XP Professional x64 Edition. The X-FI doesn't work with the former, and does work with the latter.
Elios said:well iirc Creative didnt have Live! drivers for XP till well after it was out so the there is resion to worry
i would HOPE Creative wouldnt pull a stunt like that again but you never know
there ARE working beta drives that will give you sound but like the NV drives thay dont do much other then just make the hardware work
drizzt81 said:Aside from that, it is a beta. There is zero reason to expect drivers for a beta, regardless of the amount of money that your product costs. Given that a sound card is a non-critical peripheral, who cares anyway? After all, you aren't doing production work on a beta OS anyway, are you?
drizzt81 said:Aside from that, it is a beta. There is zero reason to expect drivers for a beta, regardless of the amount of money that your product costs. Given that a sound card is a non-critical peripheral, who cares anyway? After all, you aren't doing production work on a beta OS anyway, are you?
And nobody disagreed that it ought to be that Creative does that. However, most people just complain about a product's lack of features on an internet board instead of changing their consumption habits. If you do not like the way your car (Creative) dealer is treating you, why do you keep going back to the same place?! Oh they have a monopoly? Well, then you will have to either complain to the DOJ (anti-trust suit) or suck it up.SmackDizzle said:[-snip-]So this was really the gist of my thread, it was only my opinion and I do think that based on the premium that Creative charges for its sound cards, my expectations are reasonable. Not because they promised they would, No legalities, No contractual obligations, just simple business philosophy. Thats it. I wont chime in again until I'm something more than a "NOOBIE"PEACE!
SmackDizzle said:Well, as the Motherboard Editor guy pointed out, nobody wants to hear from a "NOOBIE".![]()
But I did see one more post that caught my eye. In reference to Lexmark printers, see this really illustrates something I pointed out very early in this thread, I have bought some lexmark printers in my life and I suffered when it came to overall quality and drivers etc.. but this didnt really upset me, I felt that I had bought a very inexpensive (CHEAP) printer and I only held the bar so high where my expectations were concerned. And this is where I hold Creative and companies like them (high end items) to a bit of a different standard. When I pay a premium for something, and I can assure you AMD and ATI to name a couple Love Me Long Time, I expect a different level of support I expect them to go the extra mile. I once bought a brand new car for $4900 several years ago, I didnt complain it had no air conditioning, that the seats were uncomfortable, that the ride was terrible, and there was not even a radio, I understood there was a reason I paid so little, No Frills, No Extras of any sort and this seemed fair enough to me. However when I purchased a $40,000 vehichle some years later, I expected everything to be just right, I also found the dealer to be much more willing to take care of the minor issues that came up, and in fact was given many free services and I was treated wonderfully.
So this was really the gist of my thread, it was only my opinion and I do think that based on the premium that Creative charges for its sound cards, my expectations are reasonable. Not because they promised they would, No legalities, No contractual obligations, just simple business philosophy. Thats it. I wont chime in again until I'm something more than a "NOOBIE"PEACE!
SmackDizzle said:Holy Crap! I just became a "lite" Woot! I am now going to turn my attention to world peace and starving children.!! See I was right coming here to voice my opinion! Thank each and everyone of you for what you have done for me!! PEACE!
Dan_D said:No I was right. When I posted that, you were a noobie!![]()
well there is always darkorange and lightblue to help you express sarcasmSmackDizzle said:You say that like it's shameful. LOL.. Your right.. peeps shouldnt get to personal, but then again somethings are said with more sarcasm and light heartedness than can properly be reflected in Black/White text which is too bad, because we would probably spend more time laughing versus being offended in the real world.
cburwell said:I would disagree with what you are saying about Creative's support of their hardware on Vista. The way I look at it is that Vista is not even an offical release yet, so I don't think that they, or any other, company have an obligation to provide support for their hardware on an unsupported platform at this time.
I have a different view on their issues with current hardware and Windows XP. In that case I do think that they have an obligation to fix any problems that people are reporting in a timley manner.
Good luck with everything!
drizzt81 said:And nobody disagreed that it ought to be that Creative does that. However, most people just complain about a product's lack of features on an internet board instead of changing their consumption habits. If you do not like the way your car (Creative) dealer is treating you, why do you keep going back to the same place?! Oh they have a monopoly? Well, then you will have to either complain to the DOJ (anti-trust suit) or suck it up.
dR.Jester said:Solution to all the bickering in this thread.
Use ON-BOARD audio.
Once Vista is released, you have absolutely every right to complain, and I sincerely hope people do, if drivers aren't available by then. However, until Vista is a supported OS, there's nothing to complain about. That's the point we were all trying to make. The one doing all the complaining, I'm willing to bet, never bothered giving feedback to Creative.Josh_B said:We have every right to complain.
djnes said:Once Vista is released, you have absolutely every right to complain, and I sincerely hope people do, if drivers aren't available by then. However, until Vista is a supported OS, there's nothing to complain about. That's the point we were all trying to make. The one doing all the complaining, I'm willing to bet, never bothered giving feedback to Creative.
No, I agree....these companies *should* be releasing something for people to try out. I have a problem with people complaining on an internet forum that something doesn't work, and they spent $$$ blah blah blah on the product, and dammit where are my drivers, etc. That's the part myself and others took issue with. I have absolutely no problem with someone downloading Vista drivers, trying them out, and reporting any issues to the company. That's an invaluable tool for the hardware makers, and is what makes this whole beta process go. The problem was that ClutchS felt like Creative owed him something for Vista, and that's just not the case. Whether Creative releases beta drivers is up to them. If they feel they are doing enough testing in-house, so be it....that's their decision. They just don't owe anything to anyone until Vista is released. Then all the arguments about spending the money for their cards and expecting support are 100% valid. If ClutchS was bitching about his X-Fi for XP64, he'd have a valid complaint, and my only comments to him would have been to make sure he's providing feedback to Creative....then the onus is on them to rectify the situation.Josh_B said:Look, I see your point, but how can we test and report issues without any beta drivers?
My wife has that on a T-shirt.Josh_B said:Besides, if I don't complain about something, I'd have nothing to say.![]()
Depends, I have a digital SPDIF connection to my receiver, which is likely to have decent output characterisitcs (though it is getting old). But yes, the analog out on my laptop is junk.Josh_B said:Too bad onboard sound sucks...
djnes said:No, I agree....these companies *should* be releasing something for people to try out. I have a problem with people complaining on an internet forum that something doesn't work, and they spent $$$ blah blah blah on the product, and dammit where are my drivers, etc. That's the part myself and others took issue with. I have absolutely no problem with someone downloading Vista drivers, trying them out, and reporting any issues to the company. That's an invaluable tool for the hardware makers, and is what makes this whole beta process go. The problem was that ClutchS felt like Creative owed him something for Vista, and that's just not the case. Whether Creative releases beta drivers is up to them. If they feel they are doing enough testing in-house, so be it....that's their decision. They just don't owe anything to anyone until Vista is released. Then all the arguments about spending the money for their cards and expecting support are 100% valid. If ClutchS was bitching about his X-Fi for XP64, he'd have a valid complaint, and my only comments to him would have been to make sure he's providing feedback to Creative....then the onus is on them to rectify the situation.
My wife has that on a T-shirt.