- Joined
- Oct 19, 2004
- Messages
- 11,934
Problem is that peoples experience varies, even the blind experiment performed at [H] was not 100% in AMD court. Also the sample size is to small to honestly say one is really better than the other, or one experience is vastly improved over the other.
I honestly don't know how free sync or g-sync perform, never owned one of those types of monitors. I made a jump to a 27" before the tech was available , then made a jump to an ultra wide 34" before the tech caught up, and now I am on a 55" 4k, hoping to swap to a LG OLED later this year (If any of them every come to our side of the world).
Would have bought one of Acer/Asus 27" 144hz 4k monitors next month, now they are pushed back to Q1 or Q2 2018.
One point let's keep the comprisons clear. Adored tv wasn't stating gsync was inferior to freesync. He was saying any freesync experience is better than any vsync experience in his personal experience.
Hardforum's comparison was gsync. Vs freesync
So they are different comparisons
I haven't had much experience with gsync. But I've had a year or so with freesync. Everything I read that seems unbiased seems to point to the notion that freesync and gsync are fairly equitable technologies with minor and mostly inconsequential bottom line performance and experience deltas.
So it is reasonable to assume the adored tv host might also stage any gsync experience will best any vsync experience.
That would be a neat blind test. A RX 580 with a freesync monitor against a 1080ti with the exact same monitor and vsync.