I don't understand why people are so unwilling to go back and try graphically dated games they missed out on. Gameplay > Graphics any day for me, while it doesn't mean I'll go and be playing Warcraft: Orcs and Humans, or Wasteland anytime soon, SS2's graphics are not so bad that they are unbearable and they have texture packs and other mods that have enhanced them. Given a choice, I'd play SS2 again over Bioshock any day of the week. Hell, I spent hours trying to figure out how to get it to run on XP machines (affinity needs to be set to only one CPU) and if it weren't for network desyncs, we'd still be playing network coop at LAN parties to this day.
I keep an old Voodoo2 SLI machine going just for playing the old games ( i'm playing SS2 again right now),
its funny.. if you compare games as what they are today and the games that were made around SS2's time (1998-2002).. the comparison is pretty stark in that games today are hugely simplified over those old PC games.
everyone talks about how "indepth" todays PC games are and they are nothing compared to what games used to be.. PC games today really are pretty much equal to console games in their simplicity.
you look at games like Deus Ex, SS2, Falcon 4.0 (the ultimate combat flight sim), Battlezone (loved those 2), all the janes games, freespace 2, the Xwing series.. the complexity and depth in those games was pretty astounding..
now you look at todays game, and the most complex game i played lately are all RTSs (Sins of Solar, Theatre of War etc..). and those just tend to be complex (without the depth)
because of that i think i've played more old games this year than newer games..(last 3 years) .
there is such a huge library of good games out from the past 10 years, i'm not even sure how many new games in the future i'll buy.. Just not worth it gameplay wise.. (although Fallout 3 i'll probably pick up).