Flogger23m
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2009
- Messages
- 14,378
I know everyone likes to say Fallout or Elder Scrolls in space...but that's exactly what this looks like...not that it's a bad thing...all of the recent Fallout and Elder Scrolls games were enjoyable (I haven't played Fallout 76)...same with Ubisoft...all the Far Cry and Assassin's Creed games are basically reskins in a new setting with some new features but they're basically the same game...as long as you don't play every new version they are fun...they are never going to be GOTY material but they are fun in a gamey way
I don't think Bethesda games are like Ubisoft. Most locations in Fallout games at least have some generally good quest lines. The stories are more involved as well. Both make large, open worlds, but Bethesda has some actual exploration. Most locations have a lot going on and actually have a purpose. Quest design is quite varied. They are one of the few studios to do open world right. Ubisoft is the polar opposite. You typically get a lot of quests that are meaningless, lots of grinding, lots of repeating and similar quests, locations that you go to once for a quick minute and then never return to.
Most games would be better off without an open world, but Bethesda games absolutely require it.