Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Man how difficult is it to run two M.2 slots on the backs of these mITX MoBos? One day I guess...
I don't understand. According to my knowledge, the only differences between a B350 and an X370 are multi GPU capability and some ports. Why do manufacturers sell X370 boards when it is more expensive but, in the case of mini itx, it is basically the same as B350 boards?Fatal1ty X370 Gaming-ITX/ac
and the
Fatal1ty AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac
announced by ASRock
View attachment 26063
I thought it ran at 82C no matter what doesn't get cooler or hotterYou should be aware that the Katana might perform awful in the Sentry. In the "Hardware Unboxed" review it hits the thermal limit of 82C in an ATX tower with absolutely perfect airflow, so it will hit 82C in the Sentry even faster and either ramp up the fan speed like crazy, or thermal throttle a lot.
I thought it ran at 82C no matter what doesn't get cooler or hotter
They have already made multiple statements regarding 1080ti cards...use at your own risk pretty muchHi there,
Does anyone know if the Sentry is compatable with the EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3?
I realise it might be a tight squeeze, though the numbers say it's possible!
Sorry, the GPU compatability chart isn't updated with the GTX1080Ti's!
Hi there,
Does anyone know if the Sentry is compatable with the EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3?
I realise it might be a tight squeeze, though the numbers say it's possible!
Sorry, the GPU compatability chart isn't updated with the GTX1080Ti's!
Just wondering.. I saw the new EVGA 1080TI FTW3 and it looks sexy AF... will that card fit our SENTRYs? if not, how abt the new SC2?
Ftw3 no, sc2 yes.
The TDP is too high on these cards anyway and it's recommended that you get the founders edition instead. Though do whatever you wish!
I was told the same at their booth at computex.For those looking forward to the ASRock Mini ITX AM4 motherboard to launch soon, it won't launch until July.
"Thank you for your interest of ASRock MB. AM4 ITX will be available in the market around July. Thanks
Best Regards
JC Chung"
I'm assuming that a fanless sfx-l psi would cook in the sentry, though I wonder about the feasibility of doing something like SaberPL's watercooling setup with a short Gpu and a 120mm fan instead.
I don't get what fanless psu has to do with ITX GPU + AIO WC setup - care to elaborate?
Not the actual WC setup- just whether mounting an actual 120mm fan where you had the radiator in that build would add enough airflow to the case that a fanless psu would survive (wouldn't overheat).
Thinking more about it, though- I think the standard 450w psu is already passive to somewhere upwards of 200w. Upping the size to sfx-l and adding the fins might be enough to let the fanless one be ok.
Got it; don't think I have it fully through my head how separate the two sides are.
Reading more about it, the passive PSU has Silverstone's 800w innards, so maybe it could survive on its own?
You might want to check this thread:To the people running Ryzen on the Sentry any issues so far?
Any thoughts on the 1700 vs. 1800x? The 20 degree tCTL offset on the "x" Ryzen chips seems a bit worrying for fan control and throttling.After seeing the new Asrock motherboard and the new i9 CPU I think I am going to get the 1800x with the asrock motherboard for my sentry. Hopefully by that time Dan's cooler is already kick-started. I will probably received my case by July so everything will be out at the same time. I'm order #653 or something around there. Anyone else getting the 1800x?
To the people running Ryzen on the Sentry any issues so far?
I am going for the 1800x because for the 1700 to reach the same performance as the 1800x at stock you have to overclock it and I have seen plenty of 1700 results that show that temperatures and wattage of the 1700 when overclocked to perform similarly to the 1800x it can easily reach 140w at load while the 1800x will only reach around 104w at load which is about the same wattage you would get from the i7700k stock at load. Based on most test out there the 1800x performs either about the same as the i7700k or better, showing lower temperatures.Any thoughts on the 1700 vs. 1800x? The 20 degree tCTL offset on the "x" Ryzen chips seems a bit worrying for fan control and throttling.
Good point, I just hope the fake temperature offset doesn't cause the XFR feature to prematurely downclock.I am going for the 1800x because for the 1700 to reach the same performance as the 1800x at stock you have to overclock it and I have seen plenty of 1700 results that show that temperatures and wattage of the 1700 when overclocked to perform similarly to the 1800x it can easily reach 140w at load while the 1800x will only reach around 104w at load which is about the same wattage you would get from the i7700k stock at load. Based on most test out there the 1800x performs either about the same as the i7700k or better, showing lower temperatures.
I read that was in some specific motherboards, not all of them. And it got fixed with the latest BIOS update. I highly doubt that by the time ASROCK release their motherboard this would still be a problem.Good point, I just hope the fake temperature offset doesn't cause the XFR feature to prematurely downclock.
Im running it on an NH L9x65 SE-AM4 that I cut down with a hacksaw and put 4x40mm noctua coolers on the sides in push/pull.
what are the temps on that CPU at load?Im running a 1600x and so far it seems good stays at 3,7 and even seems to go up to 4ghz shortly at times just running auto no overclock. Im running it on an NH L9x65 SE-AM4 that I cut down with a hacksaw and put 4x40mm noctua coolers on the sides in push/pull. I got an extra 92mm noctua and mounted those two on an old 7870 card and now the noise is pretty much acceptable and it runs quite well so far.
I have a corsair h60 AIO that I tried to fit in but damn that really is hard to do, the kinks in the tubes and ram clearance and so on is a nightmare. I looked at the masterliquid series as their tubes seem more flexible, but the pump head seems to be too tall. I think you could run a 240mm radiator out of the motherboard backplate and create like an alternative foot for the cabinet to hold it, but it would require some fabrication work.
I'll stay hopeful but your shipping company has quoted the transport time. It will be held up in Australian customs for 2-4 weeks and 90% chance of being unwrapped and inspected and shoved back in it's box before delivery. I would actually of paid more for air freight and the carrier handling the import of the case, less chance of Australian customs pulling it apart and it would be in my hands 5 days after you shipped it. Honestly USD$28 is air freight pricing for shipping.According to Polish post it's 6-8 weeks, so less than two months is a worst case scenario.
I'd say if we manage to send 6 shipments by the end of June, then it's more likely August for your order (depending on your case colour), not October.
what are the temps on that CPU at load?
I am going for the 1800x because for the 1700 to reach the same performance as the 1800x at stock you have to overclock it and I have seen plenty of 1700 results that show that temperatures and wattage of the 1700 when overclocked to perform similarly to the 1800x it can easily reach 140w at load while the 1800x will only reach around 104w at load which is about the same wattage you would get from the i7700k stock at load. Based on most test out there the 1800x performs either about the same as the i7700k or better, showing lower temperatures.
Even in those test the 1800x is overclocked to 4.1Ghz. If you leave the 1800x at base speeds it will consume a lot less.You mind linking some sauce? I only have one as some others listed system power and not just CPU and I'm to lazy to search more for now.
CPU Power Draw of
Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 1800X
Edit: Overall I will agree that the 1800X uses less Watts when overclocked; however, with both the 1700 and 1700X at 4.0 GHz with a 10W difference I think it's a little silly for the price difference. Again, my opinion, all Ryzen CPUs should be overclocked. In that case, the clear winner in price will always be the non "X" variant.
Links:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1700_review,23.html
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1700x_review,24.html
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1800x_processor_review,23.html
The inconsistencies are really only from results that display the non OC 1800X compared to a OC 1700. They're not going to be comparable. You have one that will be a constant power at 4.0 GHz and the other that can "turbo" to 4.0/4.1 GHz.Even in those test the 1800x is overclocked to 4.1Ghz. If you leave the 1800x at base speeds it will consume a lot less.
I got my conclusion from this chart:
Source.
Here is another example (2nd Graph)
Another example with different wattage for the 1800x
Here they compared the 1700 overclocked with 1800x
The results are generally inconsistent but they all show a clear advantage to getting the 1800x rather than getting the 1700 overclocked to 4.0GHz or less. This makes the 1800x the best performing Ryzen 7 CPU for a limited TDP build.
Yeah I was essentially ignoring price and just going by best performance.The inconsistencies are really only from results that display the non OC 1800X compared to a OC 1700. They're not going to be comparable. You have one that will be a constant power at 4.0 GHz and the other that can "turbo" to 4.0/4.1 GHz.
It's only when you see comparisons between the OC 1800X vs OC 1700 that it's within 10'ish Watts. Your last three links showed that in their respective tests.
Edit: Yes the 1800X is a better performer, zero doubt, but it's also 180 USD more MSRP for a couple % performance increase. It also will allow you to have a CPU that will "turbo" to w/e it needs to for a given workload. Whereas a OC 1700 will always run at a given speed(depending on OC settings).
I'll stay hopeful but your shipping company has quoted the transport time. It will be held up in Australian customs for 2-4 weeks and 90% chance of being unwrapped and inspected and shoved back in it's box before delivery. I would actually of paid more for air freight and the carrier handling the import of the case, less chance of Australian customs pulling it apart and it would be in my hands 5 days after you shipped it. Honestly USD$28 is air freight pricing for shipping.
End June for shipping, July/August sea freight, September AU customs. October delivery. Happy to be wrong....
Contribution Date - January 11, 2017
Estimated Delivery Date - April 2017
My guess - October 2017
I am trying to stay positive about Sentry and understand the huge task you have in front of you, the updates do help but my original build plans are out the door now and I'm going to wait for Coffee Lake CPU and 300 series mainboards. Thank god all I bought was a GTX1080.
First of all please remember you are receiving a really big package. Really. 60x40x15cm isn't small.
4.9 kg according to 'official' weighting by Polish post. Thick cardboard adds its weight to the sole chassis weight...How much is the package weight ?
Thanks
4.9 kg according to 'official' weighting by Polish post. Thick cardboard adds its weight to the sole chassis weight...
9.1 kg / 20 lbs for those who are getting two cases.
I don't think you guys really need to explain how you organized your project. I feel like backers should have been well prepared to wait for what is nearly a hand made product.
Thanks again guys!